×
Two radial kernels are widely adopted to overtake such issues: the bi-harmonic spline (BHS) and the Wendland C2 (WC2). The BHS minimizes the mesh distortion but it is computational intense as a dense linear system has to be solved, the WC2 leads to a sparse system but can lack in smoothness.
Radial basis functions (RBFs) based mesh morphing allows to adapt the shape of a computational grid onto a new one by updating the position of all its nodes.
Two radial kernels are widely adopted to overtake such issues: the bi-harmonic spline (BHS) and the Wendland C2 (WC2). The BHS minimizes the mesh distortion but ...
In this paper we compare these two radial kernels with a specific focus on mesh distortion. A detailed insight about RBF fields resulting from BHS and WC2 is ...
Radial basis functions (RBFs) based mesh morphing allows to adapt the shape of ... comparison between the bi-harmonic spline and the wendland c2 radial function.
People also ask
2020. Radial basis functions mesh morphing: A comparison between the bi-harmonic spline and the wendland c2 radial function. ME Biancolini, A Chiappa, U Cella ...
Radial basis functions mesh morphing: A comparison between the bi-harmonic spline and the wendland c2 radial function. ME Biancolini, A Chiappa, U Cella, E ...
Radial basis functions mesh morphing: A comparison between the bi-harmonic spline and the wendland c2 radial function, Biancolini, M.E. and Chiappa, A.
Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function. Chapter. Jun 2020. Marco Evangelos ...
Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function. Published on the Computational Science ...