×
Showing results for Simplifying proofs of linearizability using layers of abstraction.
Jul 26, 2013 · Existing proofs of linearisability require one to identify so-called linearisation points within the operations under consideration, which are ...
Missing: linearizability | Show results with:linearizability
This paper presents a practical automatic verification proce- dure for proving linearizability (i.e., atomicity and functional correctness) of concurrent data ...
Abstract: Linearisability has become the standard correctness criterion for con- current data structures, ensuring that every history of invocations and ...
By increasing atomicity, a reduction phase enables a following refinement phase to implicitly establish a simple and clean abstraction map towards the ...
Missing: layers | Show results with:layers
The typical proof of linearizability establishes an abstraction map from the concurrent program to a sequential specification, and iden- tifies the commit ...
Missing: layers | Show results with:layers
These papers prove linearizability using different techniques than the one used here. ... We have demonstrated that RGSep and shape-value abstraction enable ...
Proving a data structure to be linearizable typically involves showing a refinement relation between an abstract specification of a data structure and its ...
Missing: layers | Show results with:layers
Abstract. Linearizability of concurrent data structures is usually proved by monolithic simulation arguments relying on identifying the so-called.
Apr 12, 2024 · We use this new, and compositional, understanding of linearizability to revisit much of the theory of linearizability, providing novel, simple, ...
This is achieved by augmenting the original data types with history information and using a particular type of finalization, and showing that the abstract and ...