×
After appeals, Apple's original $1.05 billion jury verdict was reduced to $548 million. Of that, $399 million in damages stem from infringement of the three design patents that are part of the Supreme Court case. The dispute arises because of the unique nature of design patents.
Dec 6, 2016 · All told, Apple was awarded $399 million in damages for Samsung's design patent infringement, the entire profit Samsung made from its sales of ...
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics
Ultimately, the Supreme Court overturned the awards and awarded nominal damages of six cents in each of the suits. The Supreme Court revisited the issue a year ...
Sep 17, 2019 · By deeming a single component significant enough to award total profits, the court aligned damages with the economic reality that an infringed ...
Although the case offers hope for Samsung and others adjudged of infringing design patents, it offers no clarity as to the rule of law. The decision centers on ...
People also ask
Mar 1, 2017 · When design patents have been infringed, courts may order defendants to pay the patentee a reasonable royalty for use of the patented design in ...
Citing jury error, District Court Judge Lucy Koh struck $450.5 million off the original judgment. Samsung ultimately paid Apple $548 million in damages in ...
In a unanimous but short opinion, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's Samsung v. Apple decision on damages and held that a design ...
Dec 12, 2016 · Supreme Court: Design Patent Damages May Be Limited to Infringing Component of End Product, Rejecting Apple's $399M Award Against Samsung · the ...