×
By emphasising expert judgement, peer review aims to ensure assessments reflect the originality, significance, and rigour of scholarly work. Seen in this light, peer review is a safeguard against over-reliance on flawed metrics, ensuring fair, transparent, and merit-based evaluations.
Oct 3, 2024
The paper concludes that because of the many criticisms of peer review, it is unwise to base funding decisions on second level peer review of articles that have ...
Oct 22, 2024 · Peer evaluations have been found to be biased by factors such as ratees' gender (Falchikov & Magin, 1997), personal knowledge (Cooper, 1981), ...
The paper concludes that because of the many criticisms of peer review, it is unwise to base funding decisions on second level peer review of articles that have.
It is concluded that because of the many criticisms of peer review, it is unwise to base funding decisions on second level peer review of articles that have ...
People also ask
The use of peer review within both the scholarly communication system and the UK's research assessment exercise is reviewed. The common denominator is that ...
Peer review – where scientists from the same field of authors with competency on a subject evaluate a submission – is the most standardised and widespread ...
May 11, 2024 · Proponents of impact-based assessments argue that the scientometric approach is more valid than peer review. As the assessment scale expands, ...
Oct 22, 2024 · In this work we compare rankings lists of universities captured by the first Italian evaluation exercise, through peer review, with the results ...
The comparison shows the great differences between peer review and bibliometric rankings for excellence and productivity. Suggested Citation. Giovanni Abramo & ...