×
The results indicate that, while latency has a stronger effect on human performance compared to low amounts of spatial jitter, jitter dramatically increases the error rate, roughly inversely proportional to the target size.
The results indicate that, while latency has a stronger effect on human performance compared to low amounts of spatial jitter, jitter dramatically increases the ...
The results indicate that, while latency has a stronger effect on human performance compared to low amounts of spatial jitter, jitter dramatically increases ...
Jul 15, 2009 · We focus on pointing and investigate the effects of input device latency and spatial jitter on 2D pointing speed and accuracy. First, we ...
Jul 17, 2009 · We focus on pointing and investigate the effects of input device latency and spatial jitter on 2D pointing speed and accuracy. First, we ...
Andriy Pavlovych, Wolfgang Stürzlinger : The tradeoff between spatial jitter and latency in pointing tasks. EICS 2009: 187-196. manage site settings.
People also ask
We investigate the effects of input device latency and spatial jitter on 2D pointing tasks and 3D object movement tasks. First, we characterize jitter and ...
5 CONCLUSIONS Latency had a stronger effect on performance in pointing tasks than low levels of jitter. The second study suggests that erratic jitter has ...
Aug 21, 2020 · In pointing tasks, Pavlovych and Stuerzlinger identified a trade- off between spatial jitter and latency, with spatial jitter having a strong ...
Previous research on spatial jitter in pointing task showed that 0.3 mm average positional jitter does not affect user performance compared to a condition ...