This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regard- ing the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law:.
PDF | On Dec 10, 2014, Francesco Olivieri and others published Two Faces of Strategic Argumentation in the Law | Find, read and cite all the research you ...
This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: ...
This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: ...
People also ask
What are the different types of legal arguments in law?
What are the different types of policy argumentation?
What is argumentation and explanation in the law?
Guido Governatori , Francesco Olivieri , Antonino Rotolo, Simone Scannapieco , Giovanni Sartor : Two Faces of Strategic Argumentation in the Law.
This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: ...
Fingerprint. Dive into the research topics of 'Two Faces of Strategic Argumentation in the Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Two faces of strategic argumentation in the law. G Governatori, F Olivieri, A Rotolo, S Scannapieco, G Sartor. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 81-90, ...
This article investigates the conceptual connection between argumentation and explanation in the law and provides a formal account of it.
Strategic argumentation is a class of competitive dialogue games in which two players take turns in contributing their arguments.