Kelompok 1 - Naskah Akademik 2
Kelompok 1 - Naskah Akademik 2
Kelompok 1 - Naskah Akademik 2
A D E M I K
AK
D o s e n P e n g a m p u : D r. D e s s y A r t i n a , S . H . ,
M.H.
• Latar Belakang
• Identifikasi Masalah
• Tujuan dan Kegunaan
• Metode Penelitian
Penyusunan Bab II:
K a j i a n Te o r i t i s d a n
Praktik Empiris
• Kajian Teoretis
• Kajian Terhadap Asas/Prinsip
• Kajian Terhadap Praktik Penyelenggaraan,
Kondisi yang Ada, serta Permasalahan yang
Dihadapi
• Kajian Terhadap Implikasi Pengaturan
• Kajian Teoretis
Kajian teoritis memuat berbagai teori dan kerangka
konsepsional terkait dengan substansi atau materi muatan yang
akan diatur dalam suatu UU. Kerangka teori dan konsepsional
tersebut akan menjadi benchmark atau acuan bagi system baru
yang akan dituangkan dalam UU. Teori (pendapat ahli) dan
kerangka konsepsional ditempatkan sebagai sumber hukum baru
yang akan dituangkan dalam UU.
• Landasan Filosofis
• Landasan Sosiologis
• Landasan Yuridis
P e n y u s u n a n B a b V:
Jangkauan, Arah
Pengaturan, dan Ruang
Lingkup
Penyusunan Bab VI:
Penutup dan Daftar
Pustaka serta
Penyelarasan Format dan
Naskah Akademik
• Simpulan
• Saran
• Daftar Pustaka
• Lampiran
Daftar
Simpulan Saran Lampiran
Pustaka
Simpulan memuat 1. Perlunya pemilihan substansi Rancangan
rangkuman pokok naskah akademik dalam suatu Daftar Pustaka Peraturan
pikiran yang berkaitan PUU atau PUU di bawahnya. memuat buku, Perundang-
dengan praktik 2. Rekomendasi tentang skala perundang- Undangan.
penyelenggaraan, prioritas penyusunan undangan, dan
pokok elaborasi teori, RUU/Raperda dalam program jurnal yang
dan asas yang telah legislasi nasional/program menjadi sumber
diuraikan. legislasi daerah. bahan
3. Kegiatan lain yang diperlukan penyusunan
untuk mendukung naskah
penyempurnaan naskah akademik akademik.
lebih lanjut.
3. DEVELOP YOUR REASONS
THANK YOU!
INTRODUCTION
Arguments are a part of every day life and they can be used for many purposes - to change someone's point of view, to promote
social action, or to ask an audience to accept the writer’s stance on a concept, issue or problem.
Argumentative texts, also referred to as persuasive texts, are intended to express an argument in order to support or refute an
idea. The writer or speaker's purpose is to convince or persuade their audience to agree with their opinion, position or belief
and they do this in a reasoned, logical way that proves their validity.
3. 4.
1. 2.
Reasons to Evidence to
Claims Counter Claims
support claims support reasons
A R G U M E N TAT I V E E S S AY
Argumentative essays look at an idea or issue, consider each side and make a case for one side
in particular. There are four main types of argumentative essays and each takes a different
approach to their structure and content. These are:
For the purpose of understanding how to structure an argument, we're going to focus on the persuasive essay form, but note that
this structure can easily be adapted to the conventions of other text types.
Persuasive essays present an argument and try to persuade the audience that one side of the argument is better than the others.
They clearly state the writer's viewpoint and use reasoning and evidence to support it. As different sides of the argument are
discussed, the writer should refute these views in order to persuade the reader that their argument is the right one.
Planning an
EN T A T I
A R G U M
V ETe x t
• Step 1 - Choose your Topic • Step 4 - Consider Counterclaims
• Step 2 - Make a Claim • Step 5 - Look for Evidence
• Step 3 - Develop your Reasons • Step 6 - Conclude
1. CHOOSE YOUR TOPIC
You also might have free range to select your own topic or issue
of interest.
Either way, you should ensure you can generate a question worthy
of discussion between opposing sides. To be able to prove your
argument effectively, you will need to consider both sides of the
debate.
2. MAKE A CLAIM
A claim is a position or stance that the writer takes on a topic, concept or issue. In persuasive essay structure, this is
known as the thesis statement and it will be found in your introduction. If your topic is a statement, consider whether you
agree or disagree. You will then need to state your viewpoint as a clear, specific and defensible statement that can be used
to guide your argument in your essay.
Ask yourself:
• Is the claim stated clearly and specifically? I.e. is it easy to understand (and not too vague or broad)?
• Is it debatable? And would someone be interested in debating it?
• Can you support it?
Example:
Standardized testing is an ineffective and unfair way of evaluating student achievement.
3. DEVELOP YOUR REASONS
Often a writer will break down their overall claim, or thesis, into smaller claims. These are usually
stated as reasons or justifications for the writer's argument - in other words, they are the 'why' behind
the claim.
Using your critical thinking skills, identify as many reasons you can think of in support of your claim.
Then, pick your best ones and rank them in order of strength or relevance.
Example:
• It is unfair to certain types of learners e.g. low-income, ESL and students with special needs.
• It can be disruptive to student learning and restrict teachers' abilities to teach effectively and creatively.
• It places unnecessary amounts of stress on students, resulting in successful students losing confidence if they don't
perform well under test conditions.
4. CONSIDER COUNTERCLAIMS
Part of writing an effective argument is anticipating opposing viewpoints so that you can disprove or
discredit them in order to strengthen your own argument. A counterclaim is an argument that works to
disagree with and disprove the writer's claim. The main purpose of including a counterclaim is to
address the opposite side of the argument and provide a rebuttal. A rebuttal is when a writer disproves
an argument.
This means you'll not only work on proving your claim, but on disproving the counterclaim or the
opposition's argument.
Example:
• Standardized testing is fair and objective, creating a universal standard of education.
• It provides an inclusive opportunity, giving students from diverse backgrounds a chance to prove they have mastered
academic material despite their circumstances.
5. LOOK FOR EVIDENCE
Once you've found your evidence, you'll want to rank it in order of strength and relevance. Make sure you can
effectively link each piece of evidence to your claim through reasoning.
6. CONCLUDE
However, this does not mean there's no room for creativity with
language features. In fact, mixing up the writing style in an essay
can be more engaging for your reader and can often make an
argument more convincing.
RHETORICAL
DEVICES
In argumentative essay, it's best to stick to rhetorical devices
that appeal to ethos and logos. While you can still include some
techniques that appeal to pathos, these should be limited so that
you still sound measured and reasonable.
It's a good idea to build up a word bank of transition words so you don't end up relying on the same ones. Varying your
language can make your writing more engaging.
ELEMENTS