skip to main content
Advertisement

Supreme Court sets aside NCDRC order barring banks from levying more than 30% interest rate on credit card dues

The court was hearing a petition challenging NCDRC decision in Awaz and Others Vs RBI case

3 min read
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • Reddit
credit card dues, supreme court, indian expressThe Court believes it is the responsibility of banks' boards of directors, not the RBI, to regulate interest rates. (File)

The Supreme Court on Friday set aside an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which barred banks from charging more than 30 per cent interest on credit card dues.

A bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma reversed a 2008 decision of NCDRC that held that it was an unfair trade practice from the part of banks to charge credit card users more than 30 per cent interest rate during delayed payments.

The court was hearing a petition challenging NCDRC decision in Awaz and Others Vs RBI case in which the question before the NCDRC was whether banks can charge credit card users interest at rates ranging from 36 per cent to 49 per cent per annum in case of default in payment within the time specified; whether such interest rates would amount to charging usurious rates of interest and whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is required to issue any circular or guidelines prohibiting the Banks/Non-Banking Financial Institutions/money lenders from charging interest above a specific rate.

Advertisement

NCDRC had held that charging interest rate beyond 30 per cent shall be considered usuries rate of interest.

The Reseve Bank of India (RBI) said that though it has directed banks not to charge excessive rates of interest, the policy is not to directly regulate the rates of interest charged by the banks and, therefore, the RBI has left the matter to the Boards of Directors of the banks. Hence, the RBI cannot be directed to issue any further instruction as it is a discretionary power conferred under thr Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The NCDRC, however, had said, “If the RBI is considered to be one of the watchdogs of finance and economy of the nation and the prevailing credit conditions are such as should invite its policy intervention, then, in our view, there is no justifiable ground for not controlling the banks which exploit the borrowers by charging exorbitant rates of interest varying from 36 per cent to 49 per cent per annum, in case of default by the credit card holders to pay amount before the due date.”

Pointing out that RBI has issued various circulars that banks should not charge usurious rate of interest, the Commission added that it has failed to specify what would be termed by it as usurious rate of interest.

Advertisement

The detailed judgment is yet to be uploaded on the court’s official web page.

Why should you buy our Subscription?

You want to be the smartest in the room.

You want access to our award-winning journalism.

You don’t want to be misled and misinformed.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close