Jump to content

Disputatio Usoris:Th1979

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia
Redactio 00:03, 29 Aprilis 2017 a conlatore UVbot (disputatio | conlationes) facta (bot: replace user signature per Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag with user permission)
(diff) ← Redactio superior | Redactio novissima (diff) | Redactio recentior → (diff)

Salve, Th1979!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!--Rafaelgarcia 04:37, 25 Septembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

de fontibus nominum locorum

[fontem recensere]

Lieber Th1979, danke für deine Beiträge zur Seite Thuringia! Da wir hier in der lateinischen Vicipaedia keine Ortsnamen erfinden wollen, sondern nur historisch belegte Ortsnamen verwenden wollen, gib bitte wenn möglich jeweils eine Quelle an, wo du den lateinischen Ortsnamen gefunden hast, siehe Fontes nominum locorum. Danke! --UV 16:28, 1 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Habesne fontem pro Uagadugum, Th1979? Reperio nomen dioecesis Uagaduguensis; id autem suggerit Uagadugu indecl., minime Uagadugum! Sed, si fons exstat, optime! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:05, 18 Maii 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you are right, it might be Uagadugu but the u-declination for city names is very rare used by Romans. So I think it must be o-Declination neutrum, but I don't have reference. The last answer, so I think, is only possible by Vatican experts. --Th1979 13:16, 18 Maii 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very true! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:20, 18 Maii 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But please, Th1979, if you move to a Latin form of a place name, add a footnote citation for the name. If you don't do this, someone else has to do the work for you -- or else, if we can't verify the name, we will revert the move. Therefore if, when moving to a new form of a name, you don't give a citation, your time might be wasted. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:06, 20 Maii 2009 (UTC)[reply]