Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Defender: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Alch Bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
28,785 edits
m Bot: checking votes in Stewards Elections 2017
Voted no
Line 133: Line 133:
# {{Se-vote|2017|KlaasZ4usV|checked=e|cb=Ankry}}  [[User_talk:KlaasZ4usV|Klaas]] `Z4␟` [[User:KlaasZ4usV|V]]:  15:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC) the least what one can expect of a steward is answering questions properly and promptly
# {{Se-vote|2017|KlaasZ4usV|checked=e|cb=Ankry}}  [[User_talk:KlaasZ4usV|Klaas]] `Z4␟` [[User:KlaasZ4usV|V]]:  15:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC) the least what one can expect of a steward is answering questions properly and promptly
# {{Se-vote|2017|Yscplus|checked=e|cb=Ankry}} [[User:Yscplus|Yscplus]] ([[User talk:Yscplus|talk]]) 19:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Yscplus|checked=e|cb=Ankry}} [[User:Yscplus|Yscplus]] ([[User talk:Yscplus|talk]]) 19:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2017|Axpde|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Axpde|<font color="#0000ff">'''a'''<small>&times;</small>'''p'''<small><sub>de</sub></small></font>]][[User Talk:Axpde|<font color="#ff0000"><small><sup>Hello!</sup></small></font>]] 10:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


==== {{sr-heading|neutral}} ====
==== {{sr-heading|neutral}} ====

Revision as of 10:18, 12 February 2017

Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Defender

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: pt-N, en-2, es-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone. I started contributing to the Wikimedia projects in the beginning of 2010, on the Portuguese Wiktionary, where I currently hold administrator (since May 2010) and bureaucrat rights. I am also an administrator here on Meta-Wiki (since July 2013) and a global sysop (since May 2014). I am active in global countervandalism/anti-spam activities and would like to be a steward in order to be able to globally (b)lock cross-wiki vandals, spambots/spammers and LTAs myself. Considering I am very active here on Meta, I would like to also help out in all other steward tasks, such as CheckUser requests, permissions requests (both local and global), SRM, SRUC and so on. I am daily present on many IRC channels, including #cvn-swconnect, #cvn-metaconnect, #wikimedia-gsconnect and #wikimedia-stewardsconnect. My time zone is UTC-3.

    I had some periods of reduced activity in 2014 and 2015 due to real life issues which are fortunately now settled, but I am now fully back. This is my second nomination for stewardship, as you can see here. I've got more experience and my activity level has greatly improved since then.

    Thank you for your time and consideration and don't hesitate to ask any questions. Best regards, Defender (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Defender


Yes

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  With continuing involvement in content work, a lot of crosswiki edits, as well as their service as a global sysop I think they will be fine as a steward. I supported last year as well, and with more activity/experience than last year I don't see why not. Rschen7754 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Per above. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  GZWDer (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Miniapolis 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Active and helpful. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 • Although I do not know the candidate very well, I have seen his activity in several wikis and I think he would be a great help to the stewards team. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ανώνυμος Βικιπαιδιστής (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ανώνυμος Βικιπαιδιστής (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Pearli (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  I support per Rschen7754 again — NickK (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Justynian I Cesarz Rzymski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Justynian I Cesarz Rzymski (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Érico (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Shriheeran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Shriheeran (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Has a variety of experience as a sysop, as an administrator, and seems prepared to graduate to the next level as a steward. He, being bilingual, can contribute in that capacity as well. Stevenmitchell (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  QEDK (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Ankry (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Good candidate. I am unconcerned over his answer to a trick question, though I would advise him to look over the concerns raised by MF-W below and take them to heart. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Luke081515 18:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Zeleni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Zeleni (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Taketa (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Adog104 Talk to me 19:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Rax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  like Ajraddatz. Rax (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. EVinente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  EVinente (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Blackhat999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Blackhat999 (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Well experienced. In regards to the concerns raised: I trust him to not act without consultation in situations that are unclear to him, it's always possible to ask other stewards for opinions/ help. Hoo man (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Alan (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Good work till now Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Ayagaures 0 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Ayagaures 0 (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Many, many vandalism reverts on Wikiversity, thank you for all your help! --Marshallsumter (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  rxy (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. RadiX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Even though I comprehend and share some of the concerns raised by MF-W in the section below, it is worth mentioning that Defender is a hardworking vandal fighter with multiple skills, and I am confident that giving him the steward toolkit will surely benefit the Wikimedia projects. This user's abilities surpass any other issues by a large margin in my opinion, and to me this is an easy support, as I did in the previous candidacy. I would be happy to see he passing this time, because he is certainly a highly qualified and trustworthy candidate. RadiX∞ 00:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  helpfull user, boa sorte com as ferramentas. Alex Pereira falaê 01:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Courcelles 01:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. MechQuester (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  MechQuester (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Beats me all the time in cross-wiki vandalism fighting, so i gave up doing it ..lol...Steward tools will help him :) Stemoc 02:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Dennis6492 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Dennis6492 (talk) 03:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mirer (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ryanx7 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ryanx7 (talk) 04:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 07:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Alex Khimich (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. PrakashAdhikari (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  I Support PrakashAdhikari (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  Shizhao (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017 •  — TBloemink talk 11:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rzuwig► 11:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Openskye (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Without objection. Good luck :-)! Leon saudanha (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Kencola (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Kencola (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  The Banner (talk) 14:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Complainer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Complainer (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Malunrenta (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Good candidate. Malunrenta (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Udo T. (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  BDaniel (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Hume42 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Hume42 (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Фред-Продавец звёзд (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Португальский язык родной. Это важно. Англо-амеров долой. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  A clear net positive. KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ghilt (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 19:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Active and competent, a good candidate for me. Syum90 (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Brateevsky (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  My opinion hasn't changed much, I even have more confidence in Defender as steward. Trijnsteltalk 20:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  -Xbony2 (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Barras (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Barras talk 21:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Supported last year, no reason not to this year. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 21:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Chansey (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Chansey (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Theo10011 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Theo10011 (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Endo999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Endo999 (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Aboulouei1 (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Aboulouei1 (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Stang 01:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  77. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  lNeverCry 02:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Earthscent (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Esmost (talk) 04:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  79. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  Seems ready for next level. OneMember (talk) 06:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Ad crumenam (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ad crumenam (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  81. David S. Hwang (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  David S. Hwang (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Rostamxani (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rostamxani (talk) 11:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shotgun pete (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Superyetkin (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Sakhalinio (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Sakhalinio (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Ph2500 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Ph2500 (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  87. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Love the name and all the work they have done... TJH2018talk 23:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Full Rune (talk) 01:32, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Henryk Borawski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Henryk Borawski (talk) 05:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Kajuran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  All the best! Kajuran (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  eurodyne (talk) 08:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Épico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Épico (talk)/(contribs) 09:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  FASTILY 10:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Varina (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Jcornelius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jcornelius (talk) 12:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Nadawa Kaushalya (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Nadawa Kaushalya (talk) 12:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Nadawa Kaushalya (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC) (One user = one vote only !)[reply]
  97. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  No reason to oppose, seems to me a good candidate to be a steward. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Plasm (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Jbergner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jbergner (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  100. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  - εΔω 17:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Matanya (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Anatoliy (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --თოგო (D) 21:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC) ok[reply]
  104. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Maleine258 (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  105. La Mantis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Shriheeran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Shriheeran (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Schnatzel (talk) 23:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Jeff alef (talk) 02:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rollingcontributor (talk) 05:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  --Holder (talk) 06:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Howan Hansi (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Buggia (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Buggia 09:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Unfortunately he didn't answer any of the interesting questions for all candidates, which would shed much light on his knowledge of the steward role and policies (even though there was at least one week for this). Also, I asked him a question with an example situation, which was arguably not that easy. However, it did include some very easy-to-see facts (e.g. on which wikis there would be CU data about which users) where I'm a bit disappointed that he didn't recognize them from the question and described what the proper action would be then, but just listed the whole range of things which could be done in which exact cases. --MF-W 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  His answers are not very satisfactory. For example the first version of his answer to the CU-question by MF-W would mean that he would send CU-data, if he is asked per email and the described case is true, to anyone — without checking if the one is really a CheckUser as he pretends. KPFC 💬 14:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Per MF-W. SPQRobin (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Nuhaa (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  per MF-W DCB (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gryllida 11:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  15:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC) the least what one can expect of a steward is answering questions properly and promptly[reply]
  8. Yscplus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Yscplus (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Axpde (Verification pending) •  a×pdeHello! 10:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Certainly good SWMT experience, but the answers given at /Questions do not really convince me, yet (especially in the early versions). Neutral for now. Vogone (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. AnselmiJuan (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 • El wikimedista tiene sus méritos, pero prefiero permanecer neutral en este caso. -- AnselmiJuan (discusión) 15:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  B20180 (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Unknown Rogi 16:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Not signaficant reasons to vote "no", but unconvienced to vote "yes" —Ah3kal (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Pretty much in agreement with the comment just above by User:Ah3kal. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  It would hurt for me to oppose, but I'm not exactly comfortable to support. Maybe next year... Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Predatorix (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  VictorBrice (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2017/Votes/Defender&oldid=16313202"