Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2018/Votes/Green Giant

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by ZLEA (talk | contribs) at 15:29, 11 February 2018 (Voted yes). It may differ significantly from the current version.
ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: en-N, fr-2, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    User:Green Giant (Meta) and c:User:Green Giant (Commons). I have been active on several Wikimedia wikis on and off for twelve years. There are several gaps in activity, mainly due to work commitments but I am now able to devote more time to volunteering. Currently I have been given the privilege of three trusted permissions. I have been an OTRS volunteer since September 2014 (I have signed the confidentiality agreements), a Commons Administrator since October 2014, and an English Wikiversity Curator since April 2017. The links to check these are on my main userpage. Usually, I try to split my time between Commons, English Wikipedia and English Wikiversity plus some OTRS activities. Some of the crosswiki work I have done in the past or currently do can be viewed on my user subpage at User:Green Giant/Work, including transferring PD or licensed files to Commons from other wikis and trying to fix the summaries of those that cannot go to Commons. Some of my work on Commons itself includes deletion requests, changing permissions for users and some blocking of disruptive users. In particular I try to give such users an opportunity to change their actions by encouraging them to use their talk pages constructively, which I think is often the key to ameliorating vandalism. For anybody who is interested I am and have been a content creator on several wikis including articles on English Wikipedia and images on Commons, but one of my current projects is to improve the coverage of English Law on Wikiversity and Wikibooks.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Green_Giant


Yes

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  good crosswiki experience (admin on two medium-large wikis) and seems to have the right mindset with most questions (except for that of MF-Warburg). Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Definitely! Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --cyrfaw (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jdx (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   jdx Re: 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   I think he is a reliable user to perform this task. The answer to the question from MF-Warburg was not very accurate, but in the rest of the aspects, I do not see anything that could interfere with his possible performance as steward. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SA 13 Bro (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Érico (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm familiar with Green Giant primarily through their work on Commons, where they have the +sysop permission, and where they have shown themselves to be a competent, friendly and helpful administrator. Their crosswiki work is excellent and the answers to the questions are sensible and pragmatic. Nick (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Through my own work in CVU and SWV I think that "give such users an opportunity to change their actions by encouraging them to use their talk pages constructively" never works out for good, but I can deal with non-believers :) enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 18:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Christian Ferrer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   *Youngjin (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Working with this user on en.wikiversity an en.wikibooks has always been a pleasure. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   hiàn 22:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I cannot speak to this person's multilingual ability, which I feel is a priority for stewards, and I always hesitate to support stewards with English emphasis. Still I confirm that this user knows Commons and file media very well and would be a trusted choice. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. JMGM (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   JMGM (talk) 02:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 03:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Thanks for your efforts on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Experienced user. --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 11:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   DCB (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Herby talk thyme 14:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Trusted and competent Ankry (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   I know him as a friendly, trusted and hardworking Commons admin. So he will probably a fine steward as well. Trijnsteltalk 22:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  36. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Good temperament and cross-wiki experience, and a willingness to learn in the areas where he lacks experience. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Trusted admin, See him around at Commons and as far as I know never has any issues, No red flags here. –Davey2010Talk 15:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Kghbln (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   [[kgh]] (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  42. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Majora (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Majora (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Lanwi1(talk) 22:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Good luck! Wolverène (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  48. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SQLQuery me! 03:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Athaenara (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Green Giant seems to have earned considerable trust and not abused it, I hope that continues. Athaenara (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Ruthven (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  52. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Soul Train (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  55. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   The Banner (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  56. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  57. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bff (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  59. ZLEA (Verification pending)   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TonyBallioni (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   --Krd 08:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Not convinced.[reply]
  4. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --Stïnger (会話) 14:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  2. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vogone (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Eurodyne (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   On the edge here, may revisit. — xaosflux Talk 16:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nihlus 21:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   The described cross-wiki experience is nice, but does not pertain specifically to tools such as CheckUser and Oversight, both of which are nontrivial to use. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   The user has a cross-wiki interest and recently got involved in Meta-Wiki, but I've not yet checked the level of experience. Sitting here for now. Nemo 11:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]