Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2018/Votes/Coffee

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards | Elections 2018
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Axpde (talk | contribs) at 06:05, 17 February 2018 (Voted no). It may differ significantly from the current version.

Coffee

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en, id-1, jv-1, es-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I have been an administrator at en.wiki for over 10 years now. I've also been trusted as an OTRS member for several years as well, assisting in some of our more controversial cases to try to work towards a solution. I do not intend to use my entrusted user right to my advantage at any point, as I have never done so on en.wik (regardless of the half-dozen editors I've had to sanction or warn who would attempt to argue otherwise). Outside of Wikimedia, I am currently retired from the en:USAF, where I was entrusted with the highest-level clearance there is (a fact the foundation is aware of) to analyze intelligence, for cyber and nuclear missions. I also was trusted as the battle staff Assistant Director during every nuclear exercise and inspection we had (a position typically filled by a LtCol) during 2009-2010. For my actions I received the the Air Force Achievement Medal, Nuclear Deterrence Operations Medal, Outstanding Unit Award (x2), Good Conduct Medal, Honor Graduate Ribbon, among other awards such as Airman of the Year, Airman of the Quarter, Airman of the Month (x2), Non-Commissioned Officer of the Quarter, and the Chief's Choice award.

    Outside of the military I was elected President of a 501(c)3 (a non-governmental organization) with over 2,200 members included. We raised over $40,000 for the local Salvation Army and assisted in schools across the local area to help underprivileged children. The Base commander stated at the end of my annual tenure that I "saved the organization from being shut down". (Words that I didn't even expect to hear... not to brag on myself too much, but I'm supposed to be selling myself here.)

    Beyond that, in my civilian life while I was still active duty, I volunteered and became appointed by a Judge to be an "Officer of the Court" in my role as a en:Court Appointed Special Advocate, which I worked at for 3 years, receiving the CASA of the month award at one point. I spent hundreds of hours doing that, and it paid off to see children end up in safe homes, or back with their families when it was healthy to do so.

    I could continue to list my qualifications, but I think you all can get the point: many organizations (including the WMF) have entrusted my ability to keep confidential information confidential, and that I won't/haven't abused the authorities given to me. I fully hope this community also extends me this same trust. As I'm running for this position purely because I see a real need for stewards... Too often on IRC or other means of communication, there simply isn't one around to handle sensitive matters. I will take my role very seriously. And I will ensure to act very slowly until I have a handle on the new position fully.

    Edit: I'm glad for those willing to support my candidacy at all, although I can see this is definitely not going to pass. Some of you were deliberately harsh in your comments here, sadly I find that uncalled for considering I doubt none of us here have not made mistakes in our past, we are all humans regardless of our roles in life. However, I still - as always - take every concern mentioned seriously and attempt to calibrate myself based upon them. This is not a statement of withdrawal however, as I see no reason to when there can always be something new to learn from someone's comment. Everyone knows something you don't after all. Thank you all and good luck to the rest of the candidates! — Coffee // have a cup // 01:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Coffee


Yes

  1. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 15:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MPS1992 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  MPS1992 (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  A little doubt, be not enough to vote neutral or no. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Kind of moral support. Wolverène (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manjappabg (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Manjappabg (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. SparklingPessimist (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  SparklingPessimist (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Siddiqsazzad001 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Good faith edits always Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Dragnadh (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Dragnadh (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cepice (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  10 of experiences Cepice (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Alzinous (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  B20180 (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fitindia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •   FITINDIA  14:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ascánder (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 22:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Dane (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  I have nothing but full confidence in Coffee. Every interaction we have had has been outstanding. Dane (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  en-wiki activity doesn't concern this vote. — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 09:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Jbhunley (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  For volunteer positions, even those of great responsibility or authority, I look for two simple criteria. Has the candidate done anything that would make me think they would abuse the position or indicate they have a motive for seeking the position which could be seen as 'improper'. The second is, do they have sufficient abilities/experience to learn the position and not do harm as they are learning it. Of all the candidates Coffee is the only one who I have observed enough to make an assessment. I have not seen any red flags that make me think he would abuse the position or fail to take it seriously. Nor have I seen any indication he would fail to diligently apply himself to learning his duties or carelessly cause harm while he does so.

    There is a part of me that has a concern that a person who has/had the level of access Coffee alludes to in his statement would mention it in a public forum - bad OPSEC. That, however, relates to a different threat environment than we have on Wikipedia so, on balance, I do not think it preculdes him from the position of Steward. JbhTalk 18:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Last edited: 19:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  22. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  --Caligatus (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Atsme (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Atsme📞📧 03:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  MaynardClark (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  per assume good faith. Garam (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Liridon (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Ral 33 (Not eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger) •  Ral 33 (talk) 14:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Manusurmars (Not eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger) •  Manusurmars (talk) 14:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ghilt (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Almost no qualifications beyond en.wiki adminship. While I don't think Coffee would leak private data, I do not think that he is temperamentally suited for the role (see the diffs mentioned here), which often involves making difficult decisions in public, and working collaboratively with other stewards and members of the community. I have seen the effects of when even just one fellow steward refuses to work as a team (as alluded to in my essay) and I do not want to take a chance here. The candidate also seems to overstate the "power" that the steward role has, which is not to "enforce regulations cross-wikis". Rschen7754 14:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  From the statement alone, which lists numerous off-wiki achievements (which may be good but just amount to saying: "because of bla and bla in the US air force, I won't reveal your private data! How great of me!") but barely mentions any on-wiki activity, I don't see why to support this candidate. In addition, with nearly 97% of edits on enwiki, he certainly does not have any cross-wiki activity. Taking also the controversial enwiki actions into account which were mentioned in some of the questions, I don't think it would be a good idea to support. Also unfortunately no reply to several questions so far. --MF-W 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --Stïnger （会話） 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  4. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  No cross-wiki activity, but controversial on his home-wiki; His off-wiki achievements could not convince me either – KPFC 💬 14:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Sadly I think the concerns raised above, and those recently raised on en.Wikipedia about Coffee's interactions with users with whom they have had even mild disagreements rule them out for this role. I hope that this will not discourage them from doing good work elsewhere on the projects. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --cyrfaw (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Coffee has made several mistakes in his administrative work on en.wiki recently and in my opinion is not suited to holding advanced positions at this time. Diannaa (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  His statement largely explains his achievements in real life more than his achievements within Wikimedia projects. Sorry, but this is not relevant for a candidacy for steward. There is also no proven global experience to evaluate how would perform on this task. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 14:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  per Rschen7754 and MF-W. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I'm not convinced. Neither is it clear for which tasks exactly these extended user rights are being requested, nor do the recent enwiki controversies outlined in the questions look promising. —Vogone (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. DoRD (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I'm sorry, but Coffee does not possess the temperament or the patience that I feel is necessary for Steward work. In addition, his recent enwiki actions have been controversial and policeman-like, so I don't think that Coffee having crosswiki advanced permissions is a good idea. —DoRD talk 14:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Thank you for your volunteer work, but you don't have enough cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I'd like to see more cross-wiki experience. Eurodyne (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Coffee would ordinarily make an good steward, but I don't believe the role is right for them at this time. I would prefer that they restrict themselves to English Wikipedia, and perhaps another project or two first, before moving into a Steward role. I disagree with the assertion that he has made several mistakes on English Wikipedia recently, he has shown a good deal of competency in managing Arbitration Enforcement, an area few others wish to tread now, such is its toxicity. Nick (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018 •  Herby talk thyme 15:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Not enough xwiki experience. — xaosflux Talk 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. SoWhy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Recent events at en-wiki left me questioning his temperament to be an admin, much less a steward. Regards SoWhy 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Leaky caldron (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Temperamentally wholly unsuitable as demonstrated by recent escalating and petulant conflicts and dubious decision making accompanied by a whiff of attempting to brush off misjudgment as insignificant. Leaky caldron (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Concerns with temperament and lack of relevant experience. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Montanabw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  The behavior of this editor in using his existing administrative tools on en.wiki on multiple occasions to attack or just issue harsh warnings to other editors (one of whom was me) with insufficient evidence and then doubling down on his position when a simple defense is offered is a clear example that he may mean well, but lacks the patience and self-control needed for the highly sensitive and tremendously responsible Steward position. Montanabw (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  per above *Youngjin (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. SA 13 Bro (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Sorry, per mentioned by DoRD and Nick at above. Certain temperament issues on English Wikipedia that run against on the spirit for your Steward works, try again next year. SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I don't care about the real life of candidates and their social position. The candidate has clearly failed to provide any information about their work on-wiki above the bare minimum, which isn't sufficent for a steward election. Milad A380 talk 20:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Coffee's been involved in a lot of drama lately on enwiki, so much so that he's taken a break from that site. I really don't think this is the right time for stewardship. Lepricavark (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Temperament concerns. Nihlus 20:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  EN-WIKI based: no cross-wiki works. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Not too much cross-wiki activity, and actions on en.wiki concern me. hiàn 22:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mortee (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Recent conduct on en-wiki has been intemperate. It's not the right time for them to be trusted with more tools, especially ones with privacy implications. Mortee (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Sir Joseph (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  I don't wish to echo all of the above, I will just say that I don't think Coffee is right for the job and is not temperamentally suited for more supervisory roles. Sir Joseph (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Devraj poudel (talk) 02:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Az1568 (talk) 04:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 • --Krd 07:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  35. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Need more training for cross-wiki experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 08:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Begoon (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Legoktm (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Gereon K. (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  39. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  DCB (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Alex Pereira falaê 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Winged Blades of Godric (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Hmm...Temperament concerns, to put it mildly. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  42. L235 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Kevin (aka L235 · t · c · enwiki) 16:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wizard-Lizard (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  Wizard-Lizard (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Holder (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Smeat75 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  After creating various dramas and brouhaha all over the place on English wikipedia, Coffee repeatedly complained that his WP activities were stressing him out and making him tense. He has gone on a self-enforced "wikibreak" and has not answered the questions put to him in this election the last few days. He is not an appropriate candidate for a position as a steward. Smeat75 (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  46. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Fdssdf (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Sagaciousphil (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Sagaciousphil (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Aiken drum (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  I wouldn't normally vote on these, but Coffee is not a good candidate for this position. Aiken drum (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Sam Sailor (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Far to much dramah created on English Wikipedia lately by this user to support stewardship any time soon. Sam Sailor 15:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Nope as per his behaviour at EN wiki - This user has a temperament issue and in all honestly shouldn't be an admin let alone a steward!. –Davey2010Talk 15:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Great floors (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Govindaharihari (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Coffee is not a good / is a bad candidate for any advanced permissions on wikipedia, they have clear emotional concerns that are made worse by working on any authoritative permissions on wikipedia. Govindaharihari (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Rzuwig► 22:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  58. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Too controversial on his home wiki, barely provide any info about his cross-wiki contribs. ~ℳɑrio (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Nearly none of the qualifications pertain specifically to tasks a steward is normally expected to do, namely cross-wiki work (emphasis on cross-wiki). I trust them on the English Wikipedia, but they are not at this time a match for cross-wiki positions. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  60. TheDragonFire (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  It is with great regret that I have to oppose Coffee's application for stewardship at this time. This user is a valued contributor to the English Wikipedia, however various unfortunate incidents over the past year or two have created community concern. Coffee is currently on an indefinite leave from the English Wikipedia, and as this represents 97% of their contributions, this request should be procedurally declined. This !vote in no way prejudices a reapplication at the next steward elections, and Coffee if you're reading, we'd love to see you there. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018 •  Eddie891 (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Virtually zero xwiki experience. Base (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  63. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  The Banner (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  64. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Sorry, but there does not appear to be enough crosswiki activity here; steward is a very crosswiki job so some experience there would be necessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Tryptofish (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Not enough cross-wiki activity, and he has been having a lot of very serious problems as an administrator at en-Wiki. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  67. UKoch (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  UKoch (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Freddy2001 talk 16:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  69. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  The user unfortunately does not have a good cross-wiki experience (virtually nothing relevant) and has some issues in English Wikipedia which is his home wiki (links show a few edits that would have been problematic in most wikis) — NickK (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  70. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  From what I've been reading in the questions, this doesn't seem like the right time to give more responsibilities to Coffee. --YodinT 20:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Nagualdesign (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  From what I've seen, Coffee exhibits questionable judgement. Nagualdesign (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Too many respected members of Coffee's home Wiki have voted no for me to be comfortable with any other vote. Dolotta (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Rivertorch (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Although the user means well, I am unconvinced that he has the even temperament and cautious nature desirable in a steward. Rivertorch (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Ritchie333 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Absolutely not - Wikipedia is not therapy and this appointment would undoubtedly cause high drama somewhere. Ritchie333 (talk) 11:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  This angry outburst indicates Coffee has too much responsibility already. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  77. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  TJH2018talk 16:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  78. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Too much controversy surrounding past contributions. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Hummerrocket (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Per temperament concerns. Hummerrocket (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Eilidhmax (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  I'm afraid I can't support this user's candidacy, after seeing the controversies surrounding them. Eilidhmax (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Yngvadottir (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Candidate works very hard for Wikipedia and undoubtedly has good intentions, but should not receive any more power. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Sorry Coffee, but no, I can't get behind this. I really think you need to take a break from administrative work in general. Since you've returned to active editing at en.wp, you've made several decisions at Arbitration Enforcement which I felt were lacking in nuance, in particular blocks that I found excessive and unwarranted. I won't say that I'll never support you for stewardship, but this isn't the right time for that. Kurtis (talk) 07:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  83. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  VIGNERON * discut. 07:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Slowking4 (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018 •  Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Huldra (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Huldra (talk) 20:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 • Inept, presumptuous and irrelevant user statement, temperamentally unsuitable. –Ammarpad (talk) 23:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  power~enwiki (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  89. DARIO SEVERI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  I'd like to see more cross-wiki experience. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Stanistani (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Nope. Not a good thing. Stanistani (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  per Rschen7754 Storkk (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  No cross-wiki activity Ibrahim.ID ✪ 14:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Complainer (talk) 16:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Zabia (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  94. De728631 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  De728631 (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Calton (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  For a variety of reasons, including some bad admin judgments on en.wiki, a tendency to assert authority, and reacting badly to feedback. Considering that he's just ducked out of en.wiki in the middle of consideration of his latest controversy, he doesn't seem to have demonstrated the judgement or temperament to be a Steward, whatever irrelevancies he cites from his CV. --Calton (talk) 04:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Deadrat (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  The user history seems little unreliable to me. Maybe after he gains some more experience (with no dramas and mixups) he can try again. Deadrat (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Not at this time. Fish and karate (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Lack of cross-wiki experience. Although enwiki issues != wikimedia issues unlike some of the enwiki users think, situation right now there with the user doesn't seem to be completely resolved. Zerabat (discusión) 12:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Axpde (Verification pending) •  a×pdeHello! 06:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  2. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Wischmat (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Mahveotm (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Openskye (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Quickfingers (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  FeralOink (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Elvesham (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Unsure of his conflict and temperament issues... Stevenmitchell (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  BugWarp (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC) I trust this user, but with all the points made above I don't know what to say.[reply]
  13. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Seems good but has a few mistakes Potatornado (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  User's explanation seems reasonable enough, but event really a little too recent for my comfort. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Anbans 585 (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2018/Votes/Coffee&oldid=17747307"