Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser

Edit links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Jyothis (talk | contribs) at 00:39, 21 June 2011 (→KJT48@pt.wikipedia). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale

{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>

<translate> Before making a request:</translate>

  1. <translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
  2. <translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
  3. <translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
  4. <translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>


<translate> How to make a request</translate>

<translate> How to make a request:</translate>

  • <translate> Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also [[<tvar name="Srcu">Template:Srcu/doc#Usage</tvar>|<tvar name="Srcu2">{{srcu}}</tvar> help]]).</translate> 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate><!--T:11--> [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate><!--T:12--> Reasons here</translate>. ~~~~
}}

    <translate> For example:</translate> 

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate><!--T:14--> [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate><!--T:15--> Reasons here.</translate> ~~~~
}}
  • <translate> Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.</translate>
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Yucazai@pt.wiktionary

Status:    Done
List of users
Marina do Carmo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Yucazai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Cabo Henrique (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): See below

This is related to a CU request that I did last month. This vandal keeps coming back with many different user names. In the past few days I have already identified and blocked the following users:

Now these three new users listed above have come and done what may seem inocuous changes, but they have his "style", so I'm almost sure it's him. I need CU confirmation to block them as well.

Also, if you could check other recent new users, it would be great, because this vandal is known to keep dozens of sleeper accounts.

If you identify that any of these users come from open proxies, please give me the ranges, so that I can block them locally.

Thanks once again for your help.

--ValJor 10:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user has many different IPs. Nevertheless I can confirm that
  • Cabo Henrique
  • Yucazai
  • Marina do Carmo
  • Fernando Nonemberg
are the same person.

The other  Confirmed group is

  • Mariano de Matos
  • Cpls não seja bobão
  • Liberdade sim, anarquia não!
  • Kagon
These two groups as well as Menesez, Manuel dos Santos, Ricardo S., Daniel Azevedo, Sem geito mesmo and Jorge es un Coitado are Likely Likely to be related to each other. Ruslik 12:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for that. Now I have a new batch to be checked:
The first one is most certainly him (on his first modification he insulted the admins), the second one is probably him, the other three may be innocent bystanders, but I don't want to take a chance, so I would like to ask you to check them all. Thanks.
--ValJor 10:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed
Others looks Unrelated Unrelated from a technical standpoint.
Regards, -- Dferg ☎ talk 19:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Another one for you to check: Cavaquinho.
I "know" it's him, I just need CU confirmation to block him. Thanks.
--ValJor 12:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not needed anymore, already done via IRC. Thanks.
--ValJor 13:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here is today's list to be checked:
Thanks!
--ValJor 16:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody home?
--ValJor 15:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated Unrelated from the technical point of view. Ruslik 12:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
┌─────────────┘
 I would like you to also check these users:
Striker talk 00:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated Unrelated from a technical point of view; each have different IP ranges. However, Murilocaixeta may be a possible sleeper account (that is just for information; it is not confirmed). PeterSymonds (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please check Cavacum. Thanks.
--ValJor 22:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Technically Unrelated Unrelated to other accounts listed above; no other accounts on the IP. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And now, please check these three:
Thanks.

TerrenceHo@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
TerrenceHo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Peggyng556 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vanessa1999 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
PinkiWu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kelly456 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
KellyMok (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Due to the same reason in previous CheckUser request: the user in the list, TerrenceHo and Peggyang556 both broke 3RR limits in same articles which the rest of the users in the list did before. If necessary, please set a short term IP range block in case of further vandalism Mys_721tx(talk) 16:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed that all above accounts are the same person. See also RaviWong and QF29. Ruslik 12:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot--Kegns 18:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Adam@pt.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
List of users
Danny Adam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Carina Lanchine (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
David Maticheus (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): I believe that the attempted fraud is obvious, since the bill did David Mathicheus issues in the discussion of this editor (a) removing warnings, created after the vote to highlight the item that is of interest to him (a) and turns the two editions. Carina Lanchinetambém would sock puppet editor (a). I do not think an investigation is necessary in this case. As the blockade requires at least consensus that the lock is made, if anyone disagrees with the illicit use of sock, the block should be made according to the rules for improper use of puppets.--Mamonas Assasinas 23:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed fr33kman 23:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops!The user David Mathicheus was created 5 minutes after the original account to take "another" notice in your talk page.Thanks,--Mamonas Assasinas 23:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you ask a ptwiki admin to deal with it. Personally, I find it interesting that your only edits anywhere are to ask for CUs on a project that "you" haven't edited on ;) fr33kman 23:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Πrate@zh.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
List of users
Πrate (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
121.15.167.189 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
113.106.234.226 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
112.216.50.242 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
123.125.156.92 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
121.14.17.54 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
109.61.62.224 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
61.238.157.46 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
211.139.195.87 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
94.112.246.2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): (Chinese)您好，我是中文維基百科的管理員T.A 白河，由於近期持續有跳板IP用戶進行特定類型條目進行破壞，並懷疑是有特定用戶進行挾怨報復攻擊，希望能夠檢查這些跳板IP是否為該用戶，並且請求進行用戶查核，謝謝。--T.A 白河(Shirakawa)(Talk - Mail) 15:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Translation: Hi, I'm T.A Shirakawa, a sysop from Chinese Wikipedia. I request to check these proxy IPs whether they are controlled by Πrate or not. These IPs vandalized specific articles in zhwiki recently, and I suspect it was the user whom attacking Wikipedia for getting revenge on somebody. Please help check him and these IPs, thank you. (translated by PhiLiP)
Unlikely Unlikelyfr33kman 15:16, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sykernouborg-az@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Sykernouborg-az (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
EL900 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
EL901 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
EL904 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Diogomauricio3 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Probable sockpuppetry. Francisco 21:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed:
    • Sykernouborg-az
    • EL983
    • EL9832
    • EL9835
    • EL9836
    • EL900
    • EL902
  • Possible Possible:
    • Margaridabraga
    • Alvaro Azevedo Moura

Alvaro Azevedo Moura looks fairly established on ptwiki. However, technical evidence suggests a rather bizarre overlap of IP ranges. At some points the two users share IPs only digits apart. Edits with a similar IP range to the vandal occur hours apart. I would urge you to reserve judgement here, but at the same time, it may be worth pursuing the evidence with this user directly.

  • Stale:
    • Diogomauricio3

--PeterSymonds (talk) 01:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ictiossauro@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Tao Pai Pai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ictiossauro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Vandalism-only accounts adding offensive content. Previous check result. Thanks. Leandro Martinez msg 14:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why is a checkuser needed if they're already blocked? -- Mentifisto 14:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If many users are related (Tio Chiquinho, Criador de artigos, Leandrinho777, Soli Deo Gloria do Yahoo ... ...) with these destructive editions (wich have to be locally supressed due the sexually explicit content), may be have more users waiting to continue this "saga" adding sexually explicit images in religious articles like this. Thank you. Leandro Martinez msg 15:14, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done, vandalism check to prevent continued abuse.  Confirmed that both users are the same and, also of interest blocked accounts:
are him. Regards,
-- Dferg ☎ talk 16:46, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno Meireles@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Bruno Meireles (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alexandremoraes5 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Clarice C. Carvalho (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
201.8.197.16 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Seems to be the same user using multiple accounts to create an edit war and insert incorrect/inappropriate content in articles such as pt:Nívea Maria and pt:Tarcísio Filho. The pattern of edits and reverts is virtually identical. RafaAzevedo 15:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed:
-- Dferg ☎ talk 16:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HelitonEsteves@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
CriciumaSC (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
CriSC (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Insistent editions in pt:Criciúma, to insert images under copyright. The main account, HelitonEsteves, has recently been blocked for war edition, and the article was protected because of him. They were already checked in Commons, but I was oriented to ask checkuser here also, before blocking any account from pt.Wikipedia. Eamaral 22:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely Unlikely The data shows them to be unrelated except by some edits. fr33kman 22:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
These accounts were earlier checked on Commons. See commons:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/CriciumaSC. Jafeluv 23:07, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that and wondered to even do it as it seemed DUCKish and confirmed, and then I thought, no I'll do it. But the technical data in ptwiki's data (UA's/XFF) etcetera doesn't support that they are related. Feel free to recheck it. :) fr33kman 00:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto239377@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Naruto239377 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Histshin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): See below

There's recently a hot debate regarding our sysop, user:Shizhao's adminship recall (c.f. Requests for comment/Oppression in zh wikipedia). According to our local recall policy, user must at least meet the auto-confirm level in order to start the recall procedure and vote. These accounts are recently making massive extremely meaningless edits like removing a punctuation then self-reverted which I suspect their purpose is to meet the voting threshold. Naruto239377 has started a new recall which is simply by copying the reasons of the failed recall of last week. Judging from the behaviors I also suspect that they're related to user:Luke7956 who was blocked indefinitely for creating massive disruptive sockpuppet. -- Sameboat (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated Unrelated fr33kman 16:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Status:    Done
List of users
User:Wenreform (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): See Sameboat

-- Ilikehongkong 17:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Confirmed:
    • Wenreform
    • Ilikehongkong
    • Ariorgzh
    • Ywmanand
    • Jackwongnsyu
    • Onlygyrotw
    • Tratra22395768
    • Yanling guan
    • 賴昱宇
  • Likely Likely:
    • Tratra22395768
  • IP blocked IP blocked.

--PeterSymonds (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zxj boy@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Zxj boy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ɵ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ø (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): All of the three user copied their userpages from others even the bureaucrat User:Wing. Also, they are making vandalisms across zhwp. Zhxy 519 16:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed. See also: 噴出牛奶, 風鬟雨鬓, Difi416. Ruslik 17:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
thanks a lot--Zhxy 519 17:32, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fabiojosue@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Fabiojosue (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Filosificos2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Probably block evasion.The confession of Filosificos2:[1].He apresent the e-mail of Fabiojosue.--Mamonas Assasinas 23:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary Unnecessary —  It looks like a duck to me. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not duck.--Mamonas Assasinas 23:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That means it seems obvious enough to be a sockpuppet --Bencmq 15:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KJT48@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
KJT48 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Longterm cross-wiki vandal. Started in August 2010, mainly with vandalising pages of the Dutch band Shocking Blue. User is Japanese and both IPs of him (work and private) were blocked in December 2010, also for accounts. So he must use another IP. Please check which one that is. Last year 74 sockpuppets were confirmed after checkusers performed on 11 wiki's. I'm sure this is another sockpuppets of him (same edit pattern etc.). Please also check for more sockpuppets. See for more information: nl:Overleg_gebruiker:Piet_van_der_Wal/blockmsg. Thanks in advance. Trijnstel 00:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Checks back to the known facts for the lta. Account locked. --Jyothis 00:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=2678040"