Jump to content

Meta:Requests for CheckUser information: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Mogoeilor: add ping
→‎Pratap Pandit: blocked one sock + s/r
Line 29: Line 29:
:{{ping|Ajraddatz}} Are you available? [[User:Aman.kumar.goel|Aman.kumar.goel]] ([[User talk:Aman.kumar.goel|talk]]) 15:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Ajraddatz}} Are you available? [[User:Aman.kumar.goel|Aman.kumar.goel]] ([[User talk:Aman.kumar.goel|talk]]) 15:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
:{{done}}, technical results are {{inconclusive}}. Please note that there is limited CU evidence available for the second account, which could result in a false negative here. Please evaluate based on behavioural evidence. – [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] ([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|talk]]) 15:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
:{{done}}, technical results are {{inconclusive}}. Please note that there is limited CU evidence available for the second account, which could result in a false negative here. Please evaluate based on behavioural evidence. – [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] ([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|talk]]) 15:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
::Behavioural analysis is quite clear they are the same person. The oldest account isn't Pratap Pandit but BabbarJatt (via enwp CU). Given both BabbarJatt and Pratap Pandit had edited here in project pages and they didn't disclose their relationship, I will block the later account with the provision that I will be willing to unblock if they stick to one account. As of the rest of the accounts, none edited meta, hence, I will not be blocking. [[User:Camouflaged Mirage|Camouflaged Mirage]] ([[User talk:Camouflaged Mirage|talk]]) 17:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
{{section resolved|1=[[User:Camouflaged Mirage|Camouflaged Mirage]] ([[User talk:Camouflaged Mirage|talk]]) 17:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)}}


===Mogoeilor===
===Mogoeilor===

Revision as of 17:53, 1 October 2020

Shortcut:
RfCU
This page allows you to request CheckUser information on Meta.
Procedure
  • Please read the CheckUser policy before asking for a check.
  • When adding new requests, please use the {{checkuser}} template to list the user names in question and {{checkip}} for IP adresses, which simplifies investigation.
  • List your request at the bottom of the "Requests for Meta-Wiki only" heading.
  • When asking for a check we need to know:
    • why do you believe that the accounts are related (please present evidence for that with the help of diffs, etc.),
    • why, if the accounts are related, they are being used abusively, in violation of policy; and
    • why a block or other measures can't be justified without the need of technical evidence.
Important
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale

{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.

Requests for Meta-Wiki only

‎Pratap Pandit

Pratap Pandit was active on Meta.Wikimedia until 21 June,[1] and he was blocked as a sockpuppet of BabbarJatt on Wikipedia as seen here. This new account Guy Foxx was registered on 7 August and makes same edits as the concerning blocked socks:[2][3]  Aman.kumar.goel (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajraddatz: Are you available? Aman.kumar.goel (talk) 15:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done, technical results are Inconclusive Inconclusive. Please note that there is limited CU evidence available for the second account, which could result in a false negative here. Please evaluate based on behavioural evidence. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Behavioural analysis is quite clear they are the same person. The oldest account isn't Pratap Pandit but BabbarJatt (via enwp CU). Given both BabbarJatt and Pratap Pandit had edited here in project pages and they didn't disclose their relationship, I will block the later account with the provision that I will be willing to unblock if they stick to one account. As of the rest of the accounts, none edited meta, hence, I will not be blocking. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark The above request for CheckUser information is closed and will be archived shortly. Please do not modify it. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mogoeilor

The 2nd and 3rd account (created today) appeared totally unsuspiciously on Talk:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Northern Luri Wikipedia to defend the project, whose main contributor is Mogoeilor, editing the main page of the proposal. --MF-W 22:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @MF-Warburg: accounts are technically Unrelated Unrelated, though from the behaviour likely meatpuppets. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_CheckUser_information&oldid=20500484"