User talk:Revi C./Archives/2020

Possible xwiki vandalism IP at KOWIKI

Hello, please review the contribs of this IP as I am monitoring him for his vandalism in geographical pages. --Hamish 16:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

False block

I have been blocked by RicherMan66 as a sock puppet of Timwikisidemen even though I'm not. The reason was that I added unsourced, promotional content and Possible COI to the W2S. None of that is true, I haven't even made a single edit to W2S, I only took part in the article's entry for deletion.

Bring that to English Wikipedia administrator. Stewards are not the overseer of local admins, and given that English Wikipedia is a self-functioning wiki, we usually don't do anything on enwiki. — regards, Revi 12:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

block

hello dear sir

you blacked me and I had no any Destructive activity.

thanks for your response.

Hi, I need to know what is the block messages, so I can assist you. Please check this page, and reply with the value you see there. — regards, Revi 20:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Computer magic

You seem fairly computer savvy. Is there any way you are aware of to get something like this Pet Scan result to work with Cat-a-lot? Having to manually add a category to 365 pages seems a touch excessive. GMG^talk 17:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

@GreenMeansGo: I moved this from enwikiquote; I want all messages from the wikis I don't actively participate centralized to Meta for archival reasons.

While I don't use PetScan for their inferiority over their predecessor, I tried to find things around it. I am not sure how to make it work with the Cat-A-Lot, but I think I can do the automated edits you need with my scripts. If you can tell me what to do (and where), I will do it from my account. — regards, Revi 19:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Dangit. I must've been on mobile at the time. I intended to leave that message for User:~riley, who has helped out with some categorization on en.quote.

At any rate, that pet scan result is English Wikipedia pages in the corresponding category, which themselves also have English Wikiquote pages. That search is useful when there's only a dozen or so results, but when it's hundreds of results, adding the Wikiquote pages to the category manually is a bit overwhelming. GMG^talk 13:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Heh, alright! Provided that the petscan result is about English Wikiquote article name, I can put all of them into provided categories in short time (compared to humans doing it manually). Or I can let ~riley handle it. — regards, Revi 13:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Also happy to help out as I know Cat-a-lot is not the idea tool for this. Feel free to shoot me a message on my enwikiquote talk page and specify which cats you want added. :) ~riley (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Importing templates

Hello. You recently imported some templates to Swedish Wikipedia ([1]). Many of those templates already existed at Swedish Wikipedia and your import replaced them with other versions. For most of the templates I dont think this made any big changes. But the imported Template:Documentation has big differences from the existing Swedish template sv:Template:Dokumentation with a redirect from sv:Template:Documentation. Please be more careful when importing templates and try to not overwrite local versions. /Ö (talk) 19:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Acknowledged. I'm sorry for the trouble you had to clean up. Thanks for doing that. — regards, Revi 19:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Un grazie e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te

Wikimedia Italia

Gentile -revi,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti del tempo che hai dedicato ai progetti Wikimedia.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Pochi giorni fa il mondo ha festeggiato la giornata dell'amore per il software libero, ma ogni giorno è buono per ricordare le garanzie delle licenze libere e le centinaia di migliaia di persone che si sono unite per costruire questo bene comune della conoscenza. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 15:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

@Nemo bis: Please explain the purpose of this message. — regards, Revi 15:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikimedia Italia thanks you for your edits to the Italian language projects. If your interest in the Italian language is very strong, you can also get a book to practice. ;-) Nemo 21:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Blocked page

Hi! I am enable to edit my userpage. Pleace i beg you to unblock it . Thanks—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stephen Charles Ezibon (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2020‎ (UTC)

Hi, can you send an email to stewardswikimedia.org? Please include what this webpage says. — regards, Revi 15:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Introducing Mark Graham

Hello Revi, I'd like to introduce you to User:Markjgraham hmb, Mark Graham at the Internet Archive. He is interested in scaling up IABot across more wikis, including smaller wikis. Can you help him with the steward bot approval process? harej (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello Harej and Markjgraham hmb, what help do you need? :) — regards, Revi 09:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Admins @skwikt

Hi, thanks for taking the time to look at my skwikt admin removal request. Your comment "There has been no actual policy provided with regards to the inactivity rules." however suggests you didn't read the request from the beginning. The inactivity rules are just a minor side story. The request is about recent vote on admin election/confirmation rules and subsequent failure of the admins to request the required annual confirmation. If you did this by mistake, please revert your action. If I misunderstood the reason you stated, please elaborate on your reasoning. — Robert Važan (talk) 01:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikibreak

I'm on a holiday for annual Wikibreak season. I still respond to Oversight request and other emergency requests, but you might have to wait for additional time for response on this talk page.

If you need...

• Oversight on Meta: email meta-oversightlists.wikimedia.org
• Oversight on Wikidata: email oversightwikidata.org
• Oversight on Korean Wikipedia: email oversight-ko-wpwikimedia.org
• Oversight on a wiki site where there is no Oversight available: email stewardswikimedia.org
• Global block appeals: stewardswikimedia.org. Include the result of this webpage.

Thanks! — regards, Revi 16:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

GlobalBlock

Hi Sir what happened in my account?Why I am blocked.Can you open my block please?There is no mistake made by me.But I want to know why I cannot edit?

You might want to read Global blocks/FAQ. — regards, Revi 18:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Spam and Blacklist Article

Have you blocked the article about Manaka Taguchi in Indonesian Wikipedia? come on it's not spam, I just want to make my article tidy, please open the spam, I still want to tidy it up again, and what spam is until 2021? are you serriously MottOkumotto (talk) 13:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello MottOkumotto, It looks like you've hit the Spam Blacklist because you didn't put the real URL, but a Google AMP URL. You have to find the real URL - check this Quora answer to see how. — regards, Revi 18:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

번역 알림: Template:Mass message userpage

-revi님 안녕하세요,

Meta에 한국어 번역자로 등록했기 때문에 이 알림을 보내 드립니다. Template:Mass message userpage 문서가 번역 대상으로 올라와 있습니다. 여기서 이를 번역할 수 있습니다:

• 한국어 번역

이 문서의 우선 순위는 낮음입니다.

여러분의 도움을 높이 평가하고 있습니다. 여러분과 같은 번역자들이 Meta 프로젝트가 진정한 다언어 공동체로 기능할 수 있도록 돕는 것입니다.

사용자 알림 설정을 바꿀 수 있습니다.

감사합니다!

Meta 번역 담당자‎, 10:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Explanation

Regarding Your action [2]; That person [3] is hounding me, and he tries to make the dysfunctionality on our project, to paralyze the normal development, to freeze the human resources. Wherever we go, whatever we do, he hounds us, annoys and spams with his load of negative energy. Kubura (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

SR areas are generally moderated by Stewards. Please leave moderation to Stewards. Thanks. — regards, Revi 12:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

점검 면제자

제가 갑자기 점검 면제자가 되었다가, 다시 회수된 이유를 알고 싶습니다. 영어로는 "이 사용자의 편집은 반드시 점검이 필요하다" 정도로 해석할 수는 있을 것 같긴 합니다만 그래도 궁금합니다. — Gomdoli4696 (토론) 06:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

귀하의 편집을 신뢰할 수 없기 때문에 권한을 부여한 관리자의 승낙 하에 권한을 회수한 사실이 있습니다. — regards, Revi 12:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

관리자님이 제 편집을 신뢰할 수 없다면, 저는 어떻게 해서 신뢰할 수 있도록 만들 수 있나요? — Gomdoli4696 (토론) 04:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

자신이 신뢰할 수 있는 행위를 한다면 시간의 흐름에 따라 누적되겠죠? 하지만 원하시는 바를 빠르게 획득하는 놀라운 비법은 아는 사람이 아무도 없을 뿐더러 알더라도 알려줄 것 같진 않네요. — regards, Revi 07:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

알겠습니다. 메타에서까지 답변해주셔서 감사합니다. — Gomdoli4696 (토론) 09:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hola.

No puedo editar en WikiPedia por mí BlackBerry. ¿Tú sabes por qué?. Saludos. Marcomedina1988 (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

번역 알림: Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard/Board Update on Branding

-revi님 안녕하세요,

Meta에 한국어 번역자로 등록했기 때문에 이 알림을 보내 드립니다. Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard/Board Update on Branding 문서가 번역 대상으로 올라와 있습니다. 여기서 이를 번역할 수 있습니다:

• 한국어 번역

이 문서의 우선 순위는 높음입니다.

여러분의 도움을 높이 평가하고 있습니다. 여러분과 같은 번역자들이 Meta 프로젝트가 진정한 다언어 공동체로 기능할 수 있도록 돕는 것입니다.

사용자 알림 설정을 바꿀 수 있습니다.

감사합니다!

Meta 번역 담당자‎, 08:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

번역 알림: VisualEditor/Newsletter/2020/July

-revi님 안녕하세요,

Meta에 한국어 번역자로 등록했기 때문에 이 알림을 보내 드립니다. VisualEditor/Newsletter/2020/July 문서가 번역 대상으로 올라와 있습니다. 여기서 이를 번역할 수 있습니다:

• 한국어 번역

이 문서의 번역에 대한 마감일은 the end of this week입니다.

여러분의 도움을 높이 평가하고 있습니다. 여러분과 같은 번역자들이 Meta 프로젝트가 진정한 다언어 공동체로 기능할 수 있도록 돕는 것입니다.

사용자 알림 설정을 바꿀 수 있습니다.

감사합니다!

Meta 번역 담당자‎, 20:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Gblock reason in log

Hi, the global block of the range it belongs to has an ambiguous link, I think you should add ":m:" into it or no one would be able to access the correct page except they're in Meta. --Hamish 16:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks! — regards, Revi 10:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Page news

How to make a small dog page on Wikipedia Revi medelam (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

번역 알림: Trust and Safety/Case Review Committee/Charter

-revi님 안녕하세요,

Meta에 한국어 번역자로 등록했기 때문에 이 알림을 보내 드립니다. Trust and Safety/Case Review Committee/Charter 문서가 번역 대상으로 올라와 있습니다. 여기서 이를 번역할 수 있습니다:

• 한국어 번역

이 문서의 우선 순위는 중간입니다.

여러분의 도움을 높이 평가하고 있습니다. 여러분과 같은 번역자들이 Meta 프로젝트가 진정한 다언어 공동체로 기능할 수 있도록 돕는 것입니다.

사용자 알림 설정을 바꿀 수 있습니다.

감사합니다!

Meta 번역 담당자‎, 08:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Ticket 2020022110007242, ko help needed

Hello hello -revi,

Sorry for I know no korean and my english is rusty.

I need help from a korean editor to complete handling of the ticket mentioned up there. The client complains that "her" article states wrong info, within which a wrong birth date (she does not states which is right instead). She tells about the prejusdice involved due to her profession (actress). I have handled the ticket and removed the (presumably wrong) info from the articles in french, english and russian version of WP as well as Wikidata, and added a message on each of the according talk page in order for next editor to know the reasons of my edit so that they do not restore it: the source "AlloCiné" is not a secondary one and is not at all reliable. Meanwhile I requested the client to produce strong elements of her real birthdate, to ensure she does not try to fool us, as well as a public source in order that editors may include it to the "her" many articles and on WD.

I would greatly appreciate if you could do the same on wp:ko and its attached talk page.

Thanks in advance for your assistance in this special issue. Cordialement, et Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Something about Korean Wikisource

fyi, this is because of Wikisource:Subdomain coordination on oldwikisource, to which "ko:" shows lack of informations of below:

• If a text is Public Domain in either South or North Korea, but not in the United States, does Korean Wikisource allow it?
• As opposite, if a text is Public Domain in the United States, but not in either South or North Korea, does Korean Wikisource allow it?

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

I think... Sotiale, long-time admin of kows, knows better than me about kowikisource practices. — regards, Revi 07:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: It has never been clearly discussed, but according to general practice, at least works that are not in public domain in Korean laws cannot be posted. South Korea adopts life+70 and North Korea adopts life+50. --Sotiale (talk) 08:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Help me!

I'm affected by banning IP 141.0.8.66. Please, help me! (Ccv2020) 171.255.67.82 12:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

74.133.177.33

Hi Revi--you placed a global block on this IP, but it's been used by an LTA to create sock accounts, who then go on to edit from other ranges. (They're doing the same from 192.181.134.156.) Have you blocked account creation there? And maybe the block should be lengthened as well... Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

번역 알림: Tech/News/2020/32

-revi님 안녕하세요,

Meta에 한국어 번역자로 등록했기 때문에 이 알림을 보내 드립니다. Tech/News/2020/32 문서가 번역 대상으로 올라와 있습니다. 여기서 이를 번역할 수 있습니다:

• 한국어 번역

여러분의 도움을 높이 평가하고 있습니다. 여러분과 같은 번역자들이 Meta 프로젝트가 진정한 다언어 공동체로 기능할 수 있도록 돕는 것입니다.

사용자 알림 설정을 바꿀 수 있습니다.

감사합니다!

Meta 번역 담당자‎, 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

번역 알림: Tech/Server switch 2020

-revi님 안녕하세요,

Meta에 한국어 번역자로 등록했기 때문에 이 알림을 보내 드립니다. Tech/Server switch 2020 문서가 번역 대상으로 올라와 있습니다. 여기서 이를 번역할 수 있습니다:

• 한국어 번역

이 문서의 우선 순위는 중간입니다.

여러분의 도움을 높이 평가하고 있습니다. 여러분과 같은 번역자들이 Meta 프로젝트가 진정한 다언어 공동체로 기능할 수 있도록 돕는 것입니다.

사용자 알림 설정을 바꿀 수 있습니다.

감사합니다!

Meta 번역 담당자‎, 13:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Global Ip Block exemption

Greetings from Bangladesh. I'm an active editor of Bangla Wikipedia. The main issue is Sometimes I need to use open proxy network for some inevitable reasons. I have been given Ip block exempt in Bangla Wikipedia. But when I go to English or other wikipedia then I can't edit with that! Can you help me by giving a global ip block exemption sir!?Wiki Ruhan (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I granted you GIPBE for 1 year. If you still need Global IP Block Exempt permission after the period lapses, ask for GIPBE on SRGP. — regards, Revi 14:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

help me

hello sir ,I i am Mayankkkkk in hindi wikipedia have six Manager but he does not active few days , i have nominate more articles for quick removal ,sir i have created 28 articles on hindi wikipedia ,sir i Request please give few user rights on hindi wikipedia , he help me for more contributes on working on hindi wikipedia.Mayankkkkk (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, local user rights are granted and removed under local policies and guidelines. Please follow them. Thank you. — regards, Revi 11:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Informing Korean Wikipedia

Hello revi!

We were wondering if you warned your community about the change concerning your Ambassador status. You already told me that you were ready to be our point of contact with your wiki, which is great! But maybe the community should be informed about it?

Also, would you have time to translate the last newsletter?

Thank you, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 12:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Forgot to do translation, will do next time. Also notified community. — regards, Revi 11:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

De-syoping

The users were blocked because of their insinuations and threats of reprisals from Stewards from Meta which was pasted on on the public forum board. The removal of the block by Ivi104 was unwarranted, he should have had a discussion with me instead of unilaterally placing a block. Both users have a history and tendency of dispensing personal insults and threats.

Your intervention in another wiki project without the consultation was not warranted, as you do not know the crux of the problem. Vodomar (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Copied from Wikidata. — regards, Revi 01:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Reconsidering

[4] Opposing is one thing, attacking is the other thing. They were sanctioned because of the unbased accusations and insinuations, not because of the opposing. Returning after 6 years and to make such attacks. Please read the summaries. So please, restore the status before Your action. The community decides whether the status will be removed or not. Kubura (razgovor) 01:42, 19. studenoga 2020. (CET)

Copied from hrwiki. — regards, Revi 00:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@Kubura: Whatever case it is (which I don't really care), it is simply wrong to redo any admin action that is contested, and it is a valid reason for a steward to intervene. — regards, Revi 00:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

And yes, community is free to restore his permission, however, if he continues that wheel war (use the admin toolset to fight with other admins) after he gets his permission back, we will do the same thing once again. — regards, Revi 00:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

The users were blocked because of their insinuations and threats of reprisals from Stewards from Meta which was pasted on on the public forum board. The removal of the block by Ivi104 was unwarranted, he should have had a discussion with me instead of unilaterally placing a block. Both users have a history and tendency of dispensing personal insults and threats. If you are fair you should also take Ivi104 rights as well, not just mine. Vodomar (talk) 01:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

If you have a proof that Ivi undid the block after you placed it back, I will do same. Otherwise he doesn't need to be desysopped because he did not engage in the war. First block is fine, first unblock is also fine. The block after the first unblock becomes problem. — regards, Revi 01:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

This is how it went:

My Block Evidencija blokiranja 07:39 Vodomar razgovor doprinosi је blokirao Kanikosen razgovor doprinosi na rok od 1 tjedan (onemogućeno otvaranje suradničkog računa) ‎(Neosnovane optuzbe) Evidencija blokiranja 07:27 Vodomar razgovor doprinosi је blokirao Imbehind razgovor doprinosi na rok od 1 tjedan (onemogućeno otvaranje suradničkog računa) ‎(Neosnovane optuzbe)

De-blocking

Evidencija blokiranja 07:52 Ivi104 razgovor doprinosi je deblokirao Imbehind razgovor doprinosi ‎(protivno mišljenje nije valjani razlog za blokadu) Evidencija blokiranja 07:52 Ivi104 razgovor doprinosi je deblokirao Kanikosen razgovor doprinosi ‎(protivno mišljenje nije valjani razlog za blokadu)

My Block

Evidencija blokiranja 09:28 Vodomar razgovor doprinosi је blokirao Kanikosen razgovor doprinosi na rok od 1 tjedan (onemogućeno otvaranje suradničkog računa) ‎(Neosnovane optuzbe i insinuacije) Evidencija blokiranja 09:27 Vodomar razgovor doprinosi је blokirao Imbehind razgovor doprinosi na rok od 1 tjedan (onemogućeno otvaranje suradničkog računa) ‎(Neosnovane optuzbe i insinuacije)

Both users have a history of personal abuse and incivility in their discussions and their approach to other users in the community. Also Kanikosen appeared after 6 years of absence, with minor micro-edits and mostly inciting bile, insinuations and threats. His commentary is that I will be prosecuted by Meta for whatever reason the two warring fractions have on the wiki. If you look at my history of approaching users as an admin, I am very tolerable - but slandering and threatening is not and should not be the modus operandi in any wiki. Also, if Ivi104 messaged me and we had a discussion, then the blocks would have been reduced. The users Imbehind and Kanikosen have been piling and tolling on the main forum and Ivi104 was one sided. My approach to a block from an admin it that i would not remove it without discussion and perform unilateral unblocking - if a admin would block again I would respect that decision as the user must have been unreasonable and insulting. Vodomar (talk) 02:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

The reason for the blocks was for hot heads to cool off with their messaging and like I said before, after looking at their history and considering the accusations/slander that they were spreading the only way to dampen this was to short-circuit this. To make it fair if my de-sysop is still there that you de-sysop Ivi as well as a fair, just and even handed measure. Vodomar (talk) 02:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

If you have a proof that Ivi undid the block after you placed it back, I will do same. Otherwise he doesn't need to be desysopped because he did not engage in the war. First block is fine, first unblock is also fine. The block after the first unblock becomes problem. — regards, Revi 01:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Read the underlines. I don't really see any point replying to the same argument without replying. — regards, Revi 02:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

As I said before, I find your intervention and removal of rights without the community decision over reaching and unjust without treating Ivi104 in the same way, because he did not conversate with me in any shape and form about my decision. The two actors in this case have a history of issues in their behavior. So even in a situation that something is justified and one person reverses a block without justification or discussion is something that can be tolerated. Then some admin can troll another admin all the way without any recourse? Vodomar (talk) 05:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

This is emergency desysop, it means I don't need to ask you or anyone from your community before I do something. Let me be clear: I don't care about the block rationale. That is not my concern. I only care that: 1. you blocked someone (fine) 2. Ivi unblocked them (not really ideal, yeah, but still fine) 3. You redo the block (you cross the line here). Your community is 100% fine to desysop Ivi for his unblock, but I am not going to fire at him because I don't see any further unblock activity from him after you reinstated the block. — regards, Revi 05:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes you didn't see that as he was openly rallying other admins to deblock the users in question

 Da napomenem i ovdje, Vodomaru su oduzeta sva suradnička prava zbog vraćanja neopravdanog bloka koji sam uklonio, što konstituira ratovanje oruđima. Molim druge administratore da uklone blok suradnicima Imbehind i Kanikosen. Ivi104 (razgovor) 01:32, 19. studenoga 2020. (CET) 

which is just a form of baiting. The emergency removal of sysop priviledges is a gross way of interfering in a community. There were many abuses of privileges in the past and you are just making an example of me. Which other person was emergency desysoped in the Croatian wikipedia space in the past years ? None. So, why are you making an example of me ? Vodomar (talk) 09:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

For instance Ivi104 had permanently blocked a username "CroatianGuy" as an unacceptable username, which is a heavy handed measure. Ivi104 has been going through and "smashing" users who are trying to register and deeming who is acceptable or not acceptable and he has been on a huge drive block new users registering. Other usernames he has blocked as unacceptable: Negro1345 - Negro is a common surname in Croatia and Italy. He blocks the user Petar_tomislav indefinitely because he considers his edits unproductive as well as for Tugomericus. Vodomar (talk) 09:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Vodomar has, despite being a sysop for all these years, shown a remarkably poor understanding of our local rules about usernames. Quoting hr:WP:SI, section 1, bullet 4 (local hrwiki username policy): Suradničko ime ne smije biti zbunjujuće, nerazumljivo ili takvo da ometa rad zajednice, niti smije sadržavati nacionalna obilježja. (Usernames must not be confusing, non-uderstandable, or disruptive, nor must it contain national features.) Croatian is obviously a national feature, so the username was blocked. Negro is a dated, and depending on the part of the world, pejorative term for a person of black skin-colour. The name was blocked due to impropriety. Tugomericus and Petar_tomislav were disruptive editors who included pseudo-facts from a disruptive and biased source (Metapedia) to our articles, disputing the origin of the Croatian people. I stated in the block reason for Tugomericus: "unproductive editing: Metapedia and biased sources, peudoscience." I hope this clears up any issues. --Ivi104 (talk) 10:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Asking for a desysop for Ivi104

Irrelevant, if you want an action based on this bring it to SRP. — regards, Revi 14:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I have evidence that Ivi104 was engaged in a similar thing you have blocked me for, despite the age of the offence he should have the same punishment as myself: Evidence Bock by Ivi104 1/11/2020 * 20:34, 1. studenoga 2020. Ivi104 razgovor doprinosi је blokirao Ceha razgovor doprinosi na rok od 5 dana (autoblok je onemogućen) (sijanje sukoba, ignoriranje argumenata) Deblock by Kubura 2/11/2020 06:57, 2. studenoga 2020. Kubura razgovor doprinosi je deblokirao Ceha razgovor doprinosi (Ceha razgovara. Drugi suradnik perpeturira optuživačku atmosferu 8 mjeseci, pa ništa.) Block by Ivi104 2/11/2020 14:39, 2. studenoga 2020. Ivi104 razgovor doprinosi је blokirao Ceha razgovor doprinosi na rok od 21:34, 5. studenoga 2020. (sijanje sukoba, ignoriranje argumenata) This is not on, if I desysoped for this, then Ivi104 should be desysoped for the above. Vodomar (talk) 09:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Unlike Vodomar, I have talked with Kubura about the block before reapplying it. See here. Ceha's defending of Kubura's socks has become repetitive, he was ignoring all arguments that didn't suit him. I blocked him to encourage him to look at the evidence with a clear head. Kubura unblocked him, and I didn't reblock the user immediately, unlike Vodomar. I instead talked with Kubura, and justified my blocks. I hope this clears up any issues. --Ivi104 (talk) 10:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Well you didn't talk to me before unblocking. Vodomar (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC) This kind of retaliation attempt is not how things work. Emergencies are for emergency. Incidents few weeks ago is NOT an emergency. It has to be today, or I am not going to act on it. Also, you are in no way entitled to command/demand something to me. — regards, Revi 10:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Really this show that you are biased and not even handed. This is not a command or demand this is something that shows that you are taking sides and that you are not handing justice in the way it should be handed. Rules are binary 1 or 0, this shows that you do not do your due dilligence and that you do not take into consideration what happens in a community wiki. So, in this case you have done wrong. Vodomar (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC) The whole issue is why is it an emergency at all, who calls those shots? If a rule is broken now or two weeks before it is a broken rule. One rule for one person and another for someone else. I guess it depends who is quick on the trigger and what the end goal is. Vodomar (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Asking for a desysop of Lasta

Irrelevant, if you want an action based on this bring it to SRP. — regards, Revi 14:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, admin Lasta can engage in multiblocks ? Evidence: admin Kubra blocks a users for sexist slurs and cyberbullying on 30/10/2020 11:30, 30. listopada 2020. Kubura razgovor doprinosi је blokirao ImJustThere razgovor doprinosi na rok od neograničeno (autoblok je onemogućen) (neproduktivno uređivanje: Nedopustivo uklanjanje primjera virtualnog nasilja. Virtualno_zlostavljanje diff 5654688 5654898) admin Lasta deblocks on 4/11/2020 05:22, 4. studenoga 2020. Lasta razgovor doprinosi je deblokirao ImJustThere razgovor doprinosi (Suradnika je blokirao admin u sukobu interesa, vjerojatno i emocionalno uključen u temu spornog članka. Trajni blok je pretjeran.) admin Kubura blocks again stating the same reasons 4/11/2020 06:12, 4. studenoga 2020. Kubura razgovor doprinosi је blokirao ImJustThere razgovor doprinosi na rok od neograničeno (onemogućeno otvaranje suradničkog računa, autoblok je onemogućen, bez uređivanja vlastite stranice za razgovor) (ne toleriram podupiranje cyberbullyinga) admin Lasta deblocks the user refuting the reasons on 4/11/2020 07:34, 4. studenoga 2020. Lasta razgovor doprinosi je deblokirao ImJustThere razgovor doprinosi (Kakvo podipiranje cyberbulinga???) There needs to be some even-handed way of dealing with issues. Vodomar (talk) 09:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Vodomar, if this is about "even-handedness" then Kubura would have to be immediately desysopped too, since he initiated the wheel war in the above example. Blablubbs (talk) 10:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Well why don't you then do that as well. Even rules for all Vodomar (talk) 11:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

What is classified as an emergency intervention and what rules do you use to evaluate this ?

What is classified as an emergency intervention and what rules do you use to evaluate this? What are the thresholds for this decision, a single e-mail from a concerned person and is that determined by yourself. What recourse does a person have in case if this emergency decision was done in haste and if a person was misled about the need for the emergency ? Vodomar (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@Vodomar Stewards can unilaterally decide on emergency desysop based on their reading of whether the action needs emergency desysop. Recourse will be to start a local RFA and if the community agrees to give you back sysop, you can get back the access. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

thank you for letting me knowVodomar (talk) 13:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@Vodomar No issues, happy to help. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2021: Invitation

The 2021 Community Wishlist Survey is now open! This survey is the process where communities decide what the Community Tech team should work on over the next year. We encourage everyone to submit proposals until the deadline on 30 November, or comment on other proposals to help make them better. The communities will vote on the proposals between 8 December and 21 December.

The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. You can write proposals in any language, and we will translate them for you. Thank you, and we look forward to seeing your proposals!

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

18:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Steward requests

Hello -revi, it's Koreanovsky!

Can you please take a look at this: Steward requests/Miscellaneous#User:SpeedyGonsales is ignoring the consensus of the hr.wiki-community?

Best regards, Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 09:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Take a look at User talk:-revi/FAQ#desysop. — regards, Revi 09:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2021

We invite all registered users to vote on the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. You can vote from now until 21 December for as many different wishes as you want.

In the Survey, wishes for new and improved tools for experienced editors are collected. After the voting, we will do our best to grant your wishes. We will start with the most popular ones.

We, the Community Tech, are one of the Wikimedia Foundation teams. We create and improve editing and wiki moderation tools. What we work on is decided based on results of the Community Wishlist Survey. Once a year, you can submit wishes. After two weeks, you can vote on the ones that you're most interested in. Next, we choose wishes from the survey to work on. Some of the wishes may be granted by volunteer developers or other teams.

We are waiting for your votes. Thank you!

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

16:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

번역 알림: Wikimedia CH

-revi님 안녕하세요,

Meta에 한국어 번역자로 등록했기 때문에 이 알림을 보내 드립니다. Wikimedia CH 문서가 번역 대상으로 올라와 있습니다. 여기서 이를 번역할 수 있습니다:

• 한국어 번역

이 문서의 우선 순위는 중간입니다.

여러분의 도움을 높이 평가하고 있습니다. 여러분과 같은 번역자들이 Meta 프로젝트가 진정한 다언어 공동체로 기능할 수 있도록 돕는 것입니다.

사용자 알림 설정을 바꿀 수 있습니다.

감사합니다!

Meta 번역 담당자‎, 07:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)