Solar projects can generally be placed in two buckets: they are either large utility-scale ground mounted projects connected to the grid, or they are smaller, distributed projects, typically 20 MW in capacity or less.
In California, and in many other U.S. states, smaller, distributed projects, particularly ones located behind-the-meter, are under attack from utilities and state legislatures, often being scapegoated for high electricity rates. A paper by Mark Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering, Stanford University, explains why we should be supporting behind-the-meter solar installations nationwide.
Distributed, small-scale solar projects are often classified as either behind-the-meter (BTM), or front-of-the-meter (FOM), depending on how they are connected to the grid.
FOM systems are connected to grid distribution lines, they serve buildings directly, minimizing the need for building additional transmission lines. Distribution lines are connected to transmission lines, so FOM solar can also feed its electricity to the transmission system. They are, therefore, subject to the same market and grid connection rules as are utility PV systems.
Behind-the-meter systems are typically smaller than FOM systems, and are often installed on buildings, over parking lots, hillsides, yards, and vacant lots that service buildings directly. Any excess electricity production from these systems can be sent back to the grid, and if the system does not meet 100% of demand, it can draw power from the grid.
“Grid operators generally oppose BTM distributed PV because its first impact is to reduces demand for grid electricity,” said Jacobson. “Utilities claim that the remaining customers must pay a higher cost for the remaining demand, mostly because the fixed cost of the transmission and distribution system is now spread over fewer customers.”
Jacobson offered ten reasons why BTM solar helps everyone:
1. The claim that BTM solar reduces electricity demand and therefore increases costs by spreading the fixed cost of transmission and distribution over fewer customers, known as the “cost shift,” ignores the reality of the energy transition. Buildings, transportation, and industry are all being electrified. Jacobson said electricity needs will nearly double.
“Even if 25 percent of the total electricity demand is met with BTM PV, overall grid electricity needs will still increase by 50 percent compared with today. Thus, the assumption by utilities that a large growth in BTM PV reduces demand holds true only for low levels of electrification, not for large-scale electrification, which is needed to address climate, pollution, and energy security problems,” said Jacobson.
2. BTM rooftop solar requires no new land, whereas utility-scale does. Therefore, BTM solar reduces land requirements and habitat damage.
3. BTM solar reduces the need for transmission and distribution lines. Grid customers need transmission and distribution lines for 100 percent of their electricity consumption, and utility PV requires transmission and distribution lines for 100 percent of its generation. BTM solar customers only need transmission lines that support the extra demand not met by their solar array.
4. When BTM solar co-located with a battery produces more than the building consumes, excess electricity is sent back to the grid. This is helpful in avoiding blackouts, particularly on hot summer days in regions where AC is used.
5. Transmission line sparks have led to devastating wildfires, such as in California and Hawaii. The cost of such fires and undergrounding transmission lines due to the fires have been passed down to customers in California. BTM solar reduces fire occurrences, said Jacobson.
6. The addition of BTM PV reduces the mining, processing, and burning of polluting fuels (fossil fuels and bioenergy) for electricity generation on the grid, thereby supporting a cleaner environment.
7. By reducing greenhouse-gas emissions from polluting fuels, BTM PV reduces climate damage to both distributed-PV and grid customers.
8. By reducing the use of fossil fuels, BTM PV reduces energy insecurity problems associated with fossil fuels.
9. Installing BTM PV creates more jobs than installing and running utility PV and other grid-scale electricity generation, and this benefits a state or country as a whole.
10. Because rooftop PV absorbs 20 to 26 percent of the sunlight that hits it, then converts the light to electricity, less light is absorbed by the building, cooling the building during the day, reducing daytime electricity demand for air conditioning. Such cooling is greatest during summer and during the day, when electricity prices are highest.
Jacobson offered a few more reasons why behind-the-meter solar is a benefit to ratepayers at large, which can be read here.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
This is a compelling argument for BTM solar, the cheapest renewable energy resource that’s also available everywhere. Arguments for “cheaper” utility scale solar & storage from state sanctioned “public’ utility monopolies conveniently leave critical aspects out of their “calculations”, because their investors make a guaranteed profit from new transmission infrastructure. Utilities serve their investors interests first & foremost.
What will it take to make cheap, clean energy available to everyone?
Solar parking lot canopies +on-site stationary storage batteries +Vehicle-2-Grid chargers installed behind-the-meter, right where most energy is being consumed by large apartments & condos, neighborhood shopping centers, business parks & various public facilities.
We have vast acres of ridiculously under-utilized (sub)urban land locked up in widely distributed hot asphalt parking lots that can be rapidly shaded with solar canopies without any new utility transmission, site acquisition, or other site improvement spending. Modular canopy structures will last for 75+years with minimal maintenance, make cleaning & maintaining solar systems very efficient, & provide area for much, much larger NetZero community micro grid systems than rooftops alone.
This is the most rapidly exploitable strategy to accelerate widely distributed, ubiquitous electric vehicle charging infrastructure at large residential, commercial & institutional properties while constructing a matrix of reliable, load-leveling local neighborhood energy storage micro grids. And this can be accomplished by typical leased residential, commercial & institutional property investors & local government using IRA investment incentives, with just ordinary local building permits & no utility interconnection delays or NIMBY opposition.
Let state sanctioned utility monopoly investors, extremely high demand industrial & commercial energy consumers, and fossil fuel companies solve their own energy & other business requirements, without taxpayer subsidies. Because they really are the least needy & the least deserving of public assistance.