Comparisons of the ILU (0), Point-SSOR, and SPAI preconditioners on the CRAY-T3E for nonsymmetric sparse linear systems arising from PDEs on structured grids

S Ma - The International Journal of High Performance …, 2000 - journals.sagepub.com
S Ma
The International Journal of High Performance Computing …, 2000journals.sagepub.com
When solving general sparse linear systems, multicoloring techniques can yield a
parallelism of order N, where N is the dimension of the matrix. However, this strategy often
suffers from the deterioration of the rate of convergence, as in the preconditioned conjugate
gradient method. Another technique that does not suffer from this deterioration of the rate of
convergence is the wavefront technique, which exploits parallelism that is available in the
original matrix. The rate of convergence remains the same, but the maximum parallelism is …
When solving general sparse linear systems, multicoloring techniques can yield a parallelism of order N, where N is the dimension of the matrix. However, this strategy often suffers from the deterioration of the rate of convergence, as in the preconditioned conjugate gradient method. Another technique that does not suffer from this deterioration of the rate of convergence is the wavefront technique, which exploits parallelism that is available in the original matrix. The rate of convergence remains the same, but the maximum parallelism is limited by the length of the wavefronts, which are often nonuniform. Another popular technique is the sparse approximate inverse (SPAI) technique, capturing the inverse in the sparse form, which is very nice for parallel computation. In this paper, the author compares these two approaches of ILU(0), SPAI, and point-SSOR preconditioners using the BICGSTAB method as the outer iterative method on the CRAY-T3E. It was found that for the problems tested, ILU(0) with multicoloring outperforms the other alternatives.
Sage Journals
Showing the best result for this search. See all results