Parallelism versus latency in simplified successive-cancellation decoding of polar codes

SA Hashemi, M Mondelli, A Fazeli… - IEEE Transactions …, 2021 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
SA Hashemi, M Mondelli, A Fazeli, A Vardy, JM Cioffi, A Goldsmith
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2021ieeexplore.ieee.org
This paper characterizes the latency of the simplified successive-cancellation (SSC)
decoding scheme for polar codes under hardware resource constraints. In particular, when
the number of processing elements that can perform SSC decoding operations in parallel is
limited, as is the case in practice, the latency of SSC decoding is, where is the block length
of the code and is the scaling exponent of the channel. Three direct consequences of this
bound are presented. First, in a fully-parallel implementation where, the latency of SSC …
This paper characterizes the latency of the simplified successive-cancellation (SSC) decoding scheme for polar codes under hardware resource constraints. In particular, when the number of processing elements that can perform SSC decoding operations in parallel is limited, as is the case in practice, the latency of SSC decoding is , where is the block length of the code and is the scaling exponent of the channel. Three direct consequences of this bound are presented. First, in a fully-parallel implementation where , the latency of SSC decoding is , which is sublinear in the block length. This recovers a result from our earlier work. Second, in a fully-serial implementation where , the latency of SSC decoding scales as . The multiplicative constant is also calculated: we show that the latency of SSC decoding when is given by . Third, in a semi-parallel implementation, the smallest that gives the same latency as that of the fully-parallel implementation is . The tightness of our bound on SSC decoding latency and the applicability of the foregoing results is validated through extensive simulations.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
Showing the best result for this search. See all results