Quantitative assessment of 2D versus 3D visualisation modalities
2011 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), 2011•ieeexplore.ieee.org
Despite the growth of stereoscopic technology, there has been very little research done into
the quantitative benefits of 3D over 2D visualisation systems. This study seeks to quantify
and compare the human brain's response to 2D versus 3D images using EEG technology, in
particular focusing on the trend in changes between the p300 response resulting from 2D
and 3D stimulus sequences using the oddball paradigm. It was found that the p300
response to the 3D stimuli degraded at a faster rate than the 2D stimuli as target spotting …
the quantitative benefits of 3D over 2D visualisation systems. This study seeks to quantify
and compare the human brain's response to 2D versus 3D images using EEG technology, in
particular focusing on the trend in changes between the p300 response resulting from 2D
and 3D stimulus sequences using the oddball paradigm. It was found that the p300
response to the 3D stimuli degraded at a faster rate than the 2D stimuli as target spotting …
Despite the growth of stereoscopic technology, there has been very little research done into the quantitative benefits of 3D over 2D visualisation systems. This study seeks to quantify and compare the human brain's response to 2D versus 3D images using EEG technology, in particular focusing on the trend in changes between the p300 response resulting from 2D and 3D stimulus sequences using the oddball paradigm. It was found that the p300 response to the 3D stimuli degraded at a faster rate than the 2D stimuli as target spotting task difficulty was raised.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
Résultat de recherche le plus pertinent Voir tous les résultats