Report on the BTAS 2016 video person recognition evaluation
2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory …, 2016•ieeexplore.ieee.org
This report presents results from the Video Person Recognition Evaluation held in
conjunction with the 8th IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications,
and Systems (BTAS). Two experiments required algorithms to recognize people in videos
from the Point-and-Shoot Face Recognition Challenge Problem (PaSC). The first consisted
of videos from a tripod mounted high quality video camera. The second contained videos
acquired from 5 different handheld video cameras. There were 1,401 videos in each …
conjunction with the 8th IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications,
and Systems (BTAS). Two experiments required algorithms to recognize people in videos
from the Point-and-Shoot Face Recognition Challenge Problem (PaSC). The first consisted
of videos from a tripod mounted high quality video camera. The second contained videos
acquired from 5 different handheld video cameras. There were 1,401 videos in each …
This report presents results from the Video Person Recognition Evaluation held in conjunction with the 8th IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems (BTAS). Two experiments required algorithms to recognize people in videos from the Point-and-Shoot Face Recognition Challenge Problem (PaSC). The first consisted of videos from a tripod mounted high quality video camera. The second contained videos acquired from 5 different handheld video cameras. There were 1,401 videos in each experiment of 265 subjects. The subjects, the scenes, and the actions carried out by the people are the same in both experiments. An additional experiment required algorithms to recognize people in videos from the Video Database of Moving Faces and People (VDMFP). There were 958 videos in this experiment of 297 subjects. Four groups from around the world participated in the evaluation. The top verification rate for PaSC from this evaluation is 0.98 at a false accept rate of 0.01 - a remarkable advancement in performance from the competition held at FG 2015.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
Showing the best result for this search. See all results