Stochastic blockmodeling of relational event dynamics
Several approaches have recently been proposed for modeling of continuous-time network
data via dyadic event rates conditioned on the observed history of events and nodal or
dyadic covariates. In many cases, however, interaction propensities–and even the
underlying mechanisms of interaction–vary systematically across subgroups whose
identities are unobserved. For static networks such heterogeneity has been treated via
methods such as stochastic blockmodeling, which operate by assuming latent groups of …
data via dyadic event rates conditioned on the observed history of events and nodal or
dyadic covariates. In many cases, however, interaction propensities–and even the
underlying mechanisms of interaction–vary systematically across subgroups whose
identities are unobserved. For static networks such heterogeneity has been treated via
methods such as stochastic blockmodeling, which operate by assuming latent groups of …
Abstract
Several approaches have recently been proposed for modeling of continuous-time network data via dyadic event rates conditioned on the observed history of events and nodal or dyadic covariates. In many cases, however, interaction propensities–and even the underlying mechanisms of interaction–vary systematically across subgroups whose identities are unobserved. For static networks such heterogeneity has been treated via methods such as stochastic blockmodeling, which operate by assuming latent groups of individuals with similar tendencies in their group-wise interactions. Here we combine ideas from stochastic blockmodeling and continuous-time network models by positing a latent partition of the node set such that event dynamics within and between subsets evolve in potentially distinct ways. We illustrate the use of our model family by application to several forms of dyadic interaction data, including email communication and Twitter direct messages. Parameter estimates from the fitted models clearly reveal heterogeneity in the dynamics among groups of individuals. We also find that the fitted models have better predictive accuracy than both baseline models and relational event models that lack latent structure.
proceedings.mlr.press
Showing the best result for this search. See all results