Jump to content

Judith Reisman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Limulus (talk | contribs) at 00:02, 21 June 2011 (shuffling sections a bit more and tweaking titles; separating 'pornography' back out into 2 sections as there is not a good lede holding them together and it keeps the flow going in the article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Judith Ann Reisman
Born
Judith Ann Gelernter

(1935-04-11) April 11, 1935 (age 89)
Newark, New Jersey
NationalityUnited States
Alma materCase Western Reserve University
SpouseJim Reisman (divorced)
Children4
Websitewww.drjudithreisman.com

Judith A. Reisman (/[invalid input: 'icon']ˈriːsmən/; born Judith Ann Gelernter on 11 April 1935) is an American cultural conservative writer best known for her criticism and condemnation of the work and legacy of Alfred Kinsey.[1][2][3][4] Noted as "the founder of the modern anti-Kinsey movement," which began with a paper she presented at the fifth World Congress of Sexology in 1981 regarding the ethics of children's data in the Kinsey Reports, Reisman has since endeavored to debunk[5] not only Kinsey but the entire field of sexology (the scientific study of human sexuality).[1][2][6][7][8][9] She has authored several books and is a columnist for WorldNetDaily and Salvo (magazine).[1][10][11]

Education and experience

Reisman attended graduate school at Case Western Reserve University, where she obtained a Ph.D. in communication studies in 1980.[1][2] Among her skills, she lists expertise in media forensics, which she defines as "the scientific analysis of images, pictures, cartoons, illustrations, pornography and text in sexual harassment of women and children in the workplace, schools, and homes." She "specialize[s] in the communication effects of images on the brain, mind and memory, fraud in the human sexuality field and the addictive properties of sexually explicit images."[1][12] While lacking specialized degrees related to human sexuality, she declares that to be an asset; a lack of 'Kinseyan training' allowing her to see without its biases, "to identify the frauds that underpin that entire 'field' — a pseudoscience created by Alfred Kinsey's followers."[12]

Advocating for children

Reisman states that her introduction to "the world according to Kinsey" began in 1966 when her 10-year-old daughter was molested by a 13-year-old, trusted family friend. She further recounts that when her daughter told him to stop, he persisted, saying that she would enjoy it; that he was going by what he had learned from reading his father's Playboy magazines.[1] Reisman states that "Hugh Hefner said he was Kinsey's pamphleteer. I then followed the trail to the Kinsey reports."[1][12]

Investigative journalist Max Blumenthal has tracked how this incident set Reisman on the path of researching Kinsey's activities. Following the sexual assault, the boy and his family slipped out of the country, while her daughter lapsed into a deep depression. Fifteen years later she died from a brain aneurysm, which Reisman suspected was linked to the earlier trauma.[13]

Since Reisman's daughter was not the only child molested by the 13-year old, a fact of which Reisman was keenly aware, the imperative to protect children from this sort of harm became a driving force in her life.[1][2]

Children in the Kinsey reports

By 1976, Reisman began to have serious concerns about Alfred Kinsey's professional ethics.[2] In Jerusalem in 1981, Reisman presented a paper at the fifth World Congress of Sexology titled "The Scientist as A Contributing Agent To Child Sexual Abuse; A Preliminary Consideration of Possible Ethics Violations" about the data on the sexual response of children in the Kinsey Reports (Tables 30 to 34).[1][2][6] Over the following years her accusations became increasingly serious; she said he was a fraud who had employed and relied on pedophiles for his research,[14] and went on to claim that Kinsey himself sexually abused children and had a "child molestation protocol".[1] This allegation drew a response from Kinsey biographer James H. Jones, who wrote that unless new evidence to the contrary becomes available, Reisman's claims that Kinsey may have witnessed or personally participated in child molestation under the guise of scientific research must be considered groundless.[15][16] The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction has stated in response to Reisman that "Kinsey was not a pedophile in any shape or form."[8][17]

After Reisman began publicizing her allegations of child abuse in the Kinsey reports, she was contacted by a woman who went by the pseudonym Esther White and claimed to have been a child whose data was given to Kinsey as a result of molestation. White would later appear in the 1998 British Film "Secret History: Kinsey's Paedophiles." While Reisman holds White's story as proof that Kinsey was intimately involved in child abuse, the Kinsey Institute has flatly denied the most scandalous claims:[18][19][20]

People may have used Kinsey's name to justify any sorts of behavior, but that is beyond the control of the researchers. It is possible that this woman's father or grandfather wrote to Kinsey, as many people did, but he never encouraged any such behavior. Following that documentary, we checked through Kinsey's correspondence and could not find any that would match this story. Kinsey did not ask people to fill out questionnaires or forms. There was no experimentation, and no one was 'recruited' to 'participate,' and certainly not to molest anyone. There is absolutely no evidence to support any of these claims. The research consisted of interviewing people about their sexual lives and relationships.[21]

Prior to the release of the 2004 film Kinsey, Reisman attempted, with the support of Laura Schlessinger, to purchase advertisement space in the entertainment trade magazine Variety "alleging Kinsey was a pervert and a pedophile". The specific ads submitted were rejected by Variety's publisher Craig Hitchcock, who stated that they were "inappropriate".[22][23]

Images of children, crime and violence

In 1983, during the Presidency of Ronald Reagan, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) was headed by social conservatives, including Alfred Regnery in the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Reisman had given a talk on a Washington, D.C. radio program and CNN's Crossfire about the "connections between sex education, sex educators, and the pornography industry" which was heard by a member of the DOJ and she was asked to discuss her views in person, which "struck a common chord [...] especially those opposed to sex education in the schools." She was then invited to apply for a grant, which was approved without competition for the amount of $798,531 (though later reduced to $734,371), to undertake a "study at American University to determine whether Playboy, Hustler and other more explicit materials are linked to violence by juveniles."[2][14][24][25][26] The allocation came under criticism as the grant was approved despite a staff memo from Pamela Swain, a director of research, evaluation and program development, in which she claimed that the study could be accomplished for $60,000.[24]

By 1986, Reisman concluded her investigation of "372 issues of Playboy, 184 issues of Penthouse and 125 issues of Hustler" that found "2,016 cartoons that included children apparently under the age of 17 and 3,988 other pictures, photographs, and drawings that depict infants or youths," the details of which were collected into "a three-volume report running to 1,600 pages" titled "Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler."[1][27] The report drew contemporary criticism in regards to its cost and its quality.[26][28] Sex crime researcher Avedon Carol commented that the report was a "scientific disaster, riddled with researcher bias and baseless assumptions." The American University (AU), where Reisman's study had been academically based, refused to publish the completed work, citing concerns by an independent academic auditor. Criminologist Robert Figlio of the University of Pennsylvania[29] stated "The term child used in the aggregate sense in this report is so inclusive and general as to be meaningless."[27][30]

Author Susan Trento chronicled additional complexities surrounding the episode. Initially, Reisman was targeted by some as a proxy to attack Regnery. The nature of Reisman's grant work and the concurrent Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, which would author the Meese Report in 1986, caused anxiety in the pornography industry. Fears began to come to fruition when 7-Eleven stores stopped selling Playboy and Penthouse, in part citing Reisman's work. Trento writes that the public relations firm headed by Robert Keith Gray was hired by Playboy and Penthouse "to discredit Meese's Pornography Commission" specifically as well as others that threatened their business, presumably including Reisman.[14][31] Reisman herself claims a wide conspiracy between "the commercial sex industry [...] the Kinsey Institute and academic sexology to prevent any light from being shed on their world."[1] "Whatever the merits of her research," Trento wrote, when support from the OJJDP was needed most, its leadership backed away from Reisman leaving her project to fail and Reisman feeling "bitter" and "helpless" after "spending years developing an expertise and doing what she thought was an excellent job in the public interest."[14]

Sources of child sexual abuse

Reisman has voiced concerns about sexual abuse of children arising from various sources, including naturism, for providing a front to child pornography and molestation;[3][32] sex education which includes sexually explicit content and describes "deviant" human sexual practices. Reisman characterizes this as "institutional child sexual abuse." She feels that issues of "emotional and sexual intimacy [...] must be off limits to school personnel" due to the potential for abuse;[33] and Playboy magazine, which she claimed was promoting child sexual abuse through carefully planned cartoons.[34] She also later took umbrage when Marge Simpson was featured in a 2009 issue: Reisman wrote that by doing so, Playboy was directly marketing to tweens as pornography "consumers and future performers."[35]

Homosexual recruitment of children

Reisman is suspicious of homosexuals, especially those who are youth leaders, fearing that their goal is to "seduce and recruit" children.[36] Reisman has claimed that the recruitment techniques employed by homosexuals rival those of the United States Marine Corps.[7] She describes her first encounter with "a growing and proselytizing 'international academic pedophile movement'" in 1977;[1] when asked further about it in a 2006 interview, she stated: "At the 1977 conference it was largely male homosexual power—pederasty– that was in evidence calling for child access."[37] Reisman cited "a clear avenue for the recruitment of children" by homosexuals in her public support of Oregon Ballot Measure 9 (1992).[38] In 1994 Reisman spoke at a conference of Christian right leaders in Colorado Springs, saying that homosexual "recruitment is loud; it is clear; it is everywhere." She estimated the homosexual population at the time to be 1-2% but predicted at least 20% (and possibly over 30%) "of the young population will be moving into homosexual activity" as a result of recruitment.[13]

Erototoxins

Reisman has postulated a physical mechanism to account for the dangers she ascribes to pornography: when viewed, an addictive "emotional polydrug cocktail mix," which she has dubbed "erototoxins," floods the brain, causing harmful influences to it.[39][40][41][42][43] She believes that Seung-Hui Cho who committed the Virginia Tech massacre had an addiction to erototoxins.[44] Reisman hopes that MRI studies will prove porn-induced physical brain damage and predicts lawsuits against publishers and distributors of pornography similar to those against Big Tobacco which resulted in the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement. Further, if pornography can "subvert cognition," then "these toxic media should be legally outlawed, as is all other toxic waste, and eliminated from our societal structure." Finally, individuals who have suffered brain damage from 'pornography are no longer expressing "free speech" and, for their own good, shouldn't be protected under the First Amendment.'[45][46][47][48][49]

Pornography and homosexuality

Reisman has stated that "all pornography promotes homosexuality."[50] She characterizes pornography as being necessarily homosexual because it is 'made by men to arouse men and boys' and further that pornography leads boys to masturbation, 'conditioning them early to male sexual touch.'[51]

Pragmatically, Playboy (that is, all pornography) manifests a blatant homosexual ethos. Its heterophobia[52] is sustained by an utilitarian analysis of Playboy images and philosophy. It is not too much to say, that just as the imagery of stained glass windows and holy cards once initiated, instructed and indoctrinated potential adherents in a religious faith, the didactic images in "soft" and "hard" pornography similarly initiate, instruct and indoctrinate potential believers in the tenants of its religion, its homosexual morality. Hugh Hefner took great pains to write his own bible; he called it the "Playboy Philosophy."[50]

Homosexuals and Nazism

Reisman has said that she believes that a homosexual movement in Germany gave rise to the Nazi Party and the Holocaust,[7] and she endorses The Pink Swastika,[7][53] which elaborates on this view.

She further has compared modern youth groups for gays to the Hitler Youth.[7] In 2009, Reisman decried the Day of Silence as attacking "traditional parental, American values" and directly compared youth involvement in the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) with the Hitler Youth. She further described GLSEN, in addition to the National Education Association and American Library Association, as being similar to organizations under the Nazi regime which sought "to sever schoolchildren from their parent's religious and sexual training."[54]

Mapplethorpe exhibition obscenity trial

During the 1990 obscenity trial of Dennis Barrie, then director of the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati, for displaying controversial photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe, Reisman was called as the only expert witness for the prosecution.[55] In the previous year, Reisman had authored an editorial in The Washington Times titled "Promoting Child Abuse as Art"[56] which "accused Mapplethorpe of being both a Nazi and a child molester".[57][58] The defense argued that she was not qualified as an art expert, but the judge allowed her to testify as a rebuttal witness.[55] Among her credentials as a media specialist she listed: "preparation of educational videotapes and slide presentations for the Smithsonian Institution [as well as having] worked for Scholastic magazine, created audio-visual segments for television's 'Captain Kangaroo' show, and did research for Attorney General Edwin Meese's commission on pornography and for the conservative American Family Association."[2][55][59] During her testimony, Reisman did not discuss the sexually explicit content of Mapplethorpe's work, but rather argued that the five photographs were not works of art because they either did not display a human face, or, in the case of Self-Portrait, the face "...displayed no discernible emotion" and absent emotion, the placement of the photographs in a museum implied that the activities displayed were appropriate.[60][61] During cross-examination by the defense on her views of homosexuality, Reisman testified that "anal sodomy is traumatically dysfunctional and is definitely associated with AIDS."[61] She also claimed that the pictures of nude children legitimized pedophilia.[60] The defense emphasized that Reisman's experience with art was limited to her work as a songwriter.[60] Barrie and the Center were ultimately acquitted of all charges by the jury.[62]

Countering the sexual revolution

Reisman considers the publication of the Kinsey reports to have caused major social decline in the United States post-World War II. She writes that despite its shortcomings, "pre-Kinsey we still were the greatest, safest, healthiest, wealthiest, most family-protective nation in the world" and summarizes the mores of the time thusly: "American law held that not only were sodomy, adultery, fornication and the like transgressions, those who committed such acts were themselves unacceptable."

Kinsey can properly be identified along with his supporters and co-workers, as the one most responsible for justifying the kind of behavior which led to AIDS, and more than Harry Hay, the real father of American’s homoerotic revolution.

— Judith Reisman, 1994[50]

Reisman states that Kinsey's publications gave his followers the ability to dismantle the legal framework which had criminalized those forms of sexual activity and altered the public's attitude towards sex by separating it from procreation, making it primarily recreational; the sexual revolution ensued. She strongly argues that the cumulative effect was negative; this "pointed America in a downward direction, promoting today's entire panoply of sexual deviances more common to the Pre-Christian era."

Reisman hopes to counter this and help "restore social virtue once again to our nation," by exposing Kinsey's "fraudulent and criminal science." To that end, she seeks to "educate both the law courts and the court of public opinion, that we've been conned, tricked and manipulated by a corrupt man, a corrupt institute, and a corrupt field of 'sexology' with its offshoots" and desires a congressional investigation of Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute, lawsuits "targeting sex education texts, images, and even speakers that defraud and harm minors" and the repeal of federal and state sex laws drafted post-Kinsey followed by the restoration of the pre-Kinsey prohibitions.[2][63][64][65][66][67]

Bibliography

  • Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People
    Judith Reisman et al.; Huntington House; Lafayette, LA (1990) ISBN 978-0910311205
  • "Soft Porn" Plays Hardball: Its Tragic Effects on Women, Children and the Family
    Huntington House; Lafayette, LA (1991) ISBN 978-0910311922
  • Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences: The Red Queen and the Grand Scheme
    The Institute for Media Education; Crestwood, KY (1998) ISBN 978-0966662412
  • Kinsey's Attic: The Shocking Story of How One Man's Sexual Pathology Changed the World
    Cumberland House Publishing (2006) ISBN 978-1581824605
  • Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America
    WND Books (2010) ISBN 978-1935071853

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "About Dr. Reisman". Dr. Judith Reisman. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Brian Fitzpatrick (20 October 2010). "Expert talks about the calamity of Kinsey". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  3. ^ a b "Judith Reisman". NNDB. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
  4. ^ Roach, David (17 January 2003). "Film portraying sex offender set to begin production". Baptist Press. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  5. ^ a b Sally Jo Sorensen (10 March 2011). "GOP's Gruenhagen calls for destruction of 'filthy' Kinsey research". The Minnesota Independent. Retrieved 19 June 2011. Reisman is described as "the much debunked Kinsey debunker" and Gruenhagen is quoted: "We need to destroy [Kinsey’s] research. It is filled with lies and fraud. The person who has done tremendous research on this is Dr. Judith Reisman. All of this can be found on the Internet."
  6. ^ a b Judith A. Reisman, PhD (June 21–26, 1981). "The Scientist As Contributing Agent to Child Sexual Abuse; A Preliminary Consideration of Possible Ethics Violations" (PDF). Dr. Judith Reisman. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  7. ^ a b c d e Daniel Radosh (6 December 2004). "The Culture Wars: Why Know?". The New Yorker. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
  8. ^ a b "Further Response to Allegations, 2003". The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Inc. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
  9. ^ "National Expert on Kinsey Visits Law School (Exposes Truth Behind Research)". Liberty University. 18 November 2010. Retrieved 1 January 2011. Quoting: "Dr. Reisman, for decades, has been the single most effective force in exposing the fraud and criminal activity committed by notorious 'sexologist' Alfred Kinsey" -- Mathew Staver, Dean of Liberty University School of Law and Founder/Chairman of Liberty Counsel. "Dr. Reisman has been a lifelong champion for women and children. She has done more to expose the crimes and frauds perpetuated by Alfred Kinsey than anyone else." -- Matthew Barber, Associate Dean for the Center for Career and Professional Development at Liberty University School of Law.
  10. ^ "Judith Reisman WorldNetDaily Commentary Archive". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 17 November 2010.
  11. ^ "Salvo Magazine (Columnists)". Salvo (magazine). Retrieved 20 December 2010.
  12. ^ a b c "The Real Kinsey: Who He Was, What He Wrought". National Catholic Register. 12–18 December 2004. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  13. ^ a b c Max Blumenthal (15 December 2004). "Her Kinsey Obsession". AlterNet. Retrieved 17 November 2010.
  14. ^ a b c d Trento, Susan (1992). St. Martin's Press. pp. 193–200. ISBN 9780312083199 http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/gray_memo.doc. Retrieved 20 November 2010. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  15. ^ Jones, James H. Alfred C. Kinsey: A Life. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc, 1997. p. 851
  16. ^ "American Experience - Kinsey - Online Forum - Questions and Answers: Day 2". PBS. 15 February 2005. Retrieved 2 January 2010. Quoting Jones: "For more than a decade rumors and accusations have circulated that Kinsey was a pedophile. I have not seen any credible evidence to support these rumors and accusations, and I do not believe that such evidence exists. Moreover, reliable people who knew Kinsey's sexual history have testified that he was not a pedophile. I believe them."
  17. ^ Gary Pool (September/October 1996). "Sex, science, and Kinsey: a conversation with Dr. John Bancroft - head of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction - Interview". The Humanist. FindArticles. Retrieved 23 November 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  18. ^ Brian Fitzpatrick (18 October 2010). "How a Kinsey victim lives with molestation trauma". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 24 November 2010.
  19. ^ ""Kinsey Crimes & Consequence" Errata". Dr. Judith Reisman. 3 June 2006. Retrieved 24 November 2010.
  20. ^ Jonathan A. Cullum (November 2005). "Scope Issue 3: Film Reviews". Scope. Retrieved 24 November 2010.
  21. ^ "Allegations About Childhood Data in the 1948 book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male". The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction. Retrieved 24 November 2010.
  22. ^ Christina Larson (8 December 2004). "The Joy of Sexology". AlterNet. Retrieved 1 January 2010.
  23. ^ Art Moore (20 January 2003). "Hollywood mag spikes `pedophile warning`". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 1 January 2010.
  24. ^ a b Associated Press (5 March 1984). "Memo: $798,000 Porn Study Could Be Made for $60,000". The Palm Beach Post. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  25. ^ "Alfred Regnery". NNDB. Retrieved 17 November 2010.
  26. ^ a b Larry Margasak (Associated Press) (3 May 1985). "New study will determine how adult magazines affect children". The Gettysburg Times. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  27. ^ a b "Nude Women, Mud Pies, And The Defecit". The Blade. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  28. ^ Associated Press (8 May 1985). "'Kiddie porn' study called waste of money". Nashua Telegraph. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  29. ^ "Footnotes--July–August 2008 Issue--Obituaries". ASA Footnotes. American Sociological Association. July–August 2008. Retrieved 28 December 2010.
  30. ^ Carol, Avedon 1994, Nudes, Prudes and Attitudes: Pornography and Censorship, New Clarion Press, Gloucester. p. 116.
  31. ^ Watts, Steven (2009). Mr Playboy: Hugh Hefner and the American Dream. Wiley. p. 375. ISBN 9780470521670. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  32. ^ "WCU Launches Another Strike". Pilgrims Covenant Church. 15 March 2000. Retrieved 31 December 2010. "Reisman [...] excoriates State Representative Mark Pocan for defending the Mazo nude beach and goes on to testify that nude beaches are a magnet for child molesters and child pornographers."
  33. ^ Michael F. Shaughnessy (12 July 2010). "Interview with Judith A. Reisman: Something Rotten in the State of Montana?". EducationNews.org. Retrieved 17 November 2010.
  34. ^ Denfeld, Rene. The New Victorians: A Young Woman's Challenge to the Old Feminist Order. New York: Warner Books, 1995. p. 110
  35. ^ Judith Reisman (14 October 2009). "Playboy targets kids by stripping Marge Simpson". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 19 November 2010.
  36. ^ David M. Bresnahan (5 October 2000). "Rape of a sacred trust". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 24 November 2010.
  37. ^ "Interview: Dr Judith Reisman". 8 October 2006. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
  38. ^ Associated Press (15 October 1992). "Ex-gay minister backs Oregon Measure 9". Moscow-Pullman Daily News. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
  39. ^ Jan LaRue (2 December 2004). "Senate Subcommittee Hears Experts on Pornography Toxicity". Concerned Women for America. Retrieved 17 November 2010. (note: this is a mirror of the original which is now missing from their site)
  40. ^ Statement of Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., President, Institute for Media Education (November 18, 2004). "The Brain Science Behind Pornography Addiction and the Effects of Addiction on Families and Communities" (PDF). Testimony before the United States Senate, Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Retrieved 17 November 2010. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  41. ^ "Erototoxin". Retrieved 17 November 2010. (index of articles)
  42. ^ Bobby Maddex (Spring 2007). "The Naked Truth: An Interview with Dr. Judith Reisman". Salvo (magazine). Retrieved 21 December 2010.
  43. ^ Jacob Sullum (8 December 2004). "From Donuts To Heroin". AlterNet. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
  44. ^ Judith Reisman (23 April 2007). "Cho's erototoxic addiction". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  45. ^ Mark Pilkington (14 July 2005). "Sex on the brain". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  46. ^ Ryan Singel (19 November 2004). "Internet Porn: Worse Than Crack?". Wired (magazine). Retrieved 28 December 2010.
  47. ^ "The Lighted Candle Society - June 2004 Newsletter". The Lighted Candle Society. June 2004. Retrieved 28 December 2010.
  48. ^ Cristian Bodo (18 December 2008). "Does Sex Addiction Have Any Basis in Science?". AlterNet. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  49. ^ Annalee Newitz (30 November 2004). "Your Brain on Porn". AlterNet. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  50. ^ a b c "The Pink Swastika 4th Edition - Final". Retrieved 19 June 2011. Quoting from Chapter 10, "Closing Thoughts."
  51. ^ Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. (April, 2005). "All PORNOGRAPHY IS HOMOEROTIC" (PDF). Retrieved 19 June 2011. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  52. ^ "Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud". Google Books. Retrieved 22 November 2010. Search results for heterophobia in Reisman's Kinsey, Sex and Fraud.
  53. ^ "The Pink Swastika (Reviews)". Retrieved 1 January 2010. Quoting Reisman: "As a Jewish scholar who lost hundreds of her family in the Holocaust, I welcome The Pink Swastika as courageous and timely...Lively and Abrams reveal the reigning 'gay history' as revisionist and expose the supermale German homosexuals for what they were - Nazi brutes, not Nazi victims."
  54. ^ Judith Reisman (1 April 2009). "GLSEN and the Hitler Youth". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
  55. ^ a b c Associated Press (5 October 1990). "Prosecution expert degrades 'art' photos". The Vindicator. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  56. ^ Strickland, Ronald (2002). Growing Up Postmodern: Neoliberalism and the War on the Young. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 136. ISBN 978-0742516519. Retrieved 1 January 2011. quotes Reisman from "Promoting Child Abuse as Art" in the 7 July 1989 edition of The Washington Times.
  57. ^ Bolton, Robert (1989). "The cultural contradictions of conservatism". New Art Examiner. 17. Retrieved 01 January 2011. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  58. ^ Debbie Nathan (18 April 2002). "The Taboos of Touch". AlterNet. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  59. ^ Masters, Kim (1990-10-06). "Art Gallery Not Guilty of Obscenity;Cincinnati Jury Clears Mapplethorpe Exhibitors of All Charges". The Washington Post.
  60. ^ a b c Wilkerson, Isabel (1990-10-05). "Witness in Obscenity Trial Calls Explicit Photographs 'Destructive'". The New York Times.
  61. ^ a b Meyer, Richard (2002). Outlaw Representation: Censorship and Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century American Art. Beacon Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 0807079359.
  62. ^ Steven Litt (05 October 2010). "Dennis Barrie looks back on his Cincinnati obscenity trial 20 years after his acquittal". The Plain Dealer. Retrieved 19 June 2011. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  63. ^ Judith Reisman. "Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution". Archived from the original on 15 January 2008. Retrieved 18 November 2010.
  64. ^ Judith Reisman (Spring 2010). "What Is to Be Done?". Salvo (magazine). Retrieved 21 December 2010.
  65. ^ Judith Reisman (Spring 2009). "Rape Rates". Salvo (magazine). Retrieved 21 December 2010.
  66. ^ Larry Keller (19 September 2010). "World Net Daily Speakers Defend Tea Parties". Hatewatch. Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
  67. ^ David M. Kinchen (8 December 2010). "BOOK REVIEW: 'Sexual Sabotage'". Huntington News Network. Retrieved 1 January 2010.
  68. ^ Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. "The Far-Right's Fight Against Kinsey". Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  69. ^ Dave Welch (1 January 2011). "From Darwin to Marx to Kinsey to Obama". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 1 January 2010. quotes Reisman as saying that Darwin was a "major influence on Kinsey"
  70. ^ "Newsradio 1040 WHO". WHO (AM). 20 October 2010. Retrieved 1 January 2010. A linked half-hour MP3 interview of Reisman ("Perhaps the nation's foremost researcher exposing the true Kinsey, and the unfortunate impact it's had on America.") by Steve Deace; discussion of Darwin starts about 12 minutes in. "Kinsey is a continuation of Darwin [...] Kinsey was dramatically impacted by Darwin"
  71. ^ Judith Reisman (22 November 2006). "Darwin's Fairytales Have Led Us to Savage Waters". Human Events. Retrieved 1 January 2010. "Kinsey, the high priest of sex, decided to sexually reform America after reading Darwin in college."
  72. ^ "Author warns against believing 'sexperts'". WorldNetDaily. 20 August 2010. Retrieved 2 January 2011. "defenders of Judeo-Christian traditions appear to be priming for some demoralizing culture-war defeats [...] The battles are lost, says Judith Reisman [...] if those fighting them keep failing to address the pink elephant hovering over each case – Alfred Kinsey."
  73. ^ Judith Reisman (12 February 1999). "Sex revolution triggers national impotence". WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  74. ^ Judith A. Reisman (29 July 1995). "Partner Solicitation Language As A Reflection Of Male Sexual Orientation". Collected Papers from the NARTH Annual Conference, Saturday, 29 July 1995. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  75. ^ Michelle Mittelstadt (8 December 1995). "Probe into sex study suggested". The Free Lance–Star. Associated Press. Retrieved 18 June 2011.

Multimedia

Biographical entries

Template:Persondata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judith_Reisman&oldid=435369481"