Til Death Do Us Part

The desert is silent except for the quiet digging of a man resolved in his actions. His face holds a solemnly resigned expression, firm in his actions but eyes pooling with hurt upon gazing on the still body that lay next to him. Yes, you guys already know what time it is. Dead lovers time. Again. 

“Angie, really? Another painting about death and love and sadness >:((?? I’d rather stare at Saturn eating his kid >:(((” 

Yeah, I’m starting to see a bit of a pattern to my passion posts, but what can I say? My kryptonite is tragic paintings, especially when romance is involved! And oh boy does this painting really take the cake. In simple terms it’s the Romeo and Juliet of paintings, a story of two lovers that were destined to be apart. Buckle in. This story is French and French names are a lot. (Literally take the name of the artist of this painting Pascal-Adolphe-Jean Dagnan-Bouveret. Say that five times fast). 

The Burial of Manon Lescaut by Pascal-Adolphe-Jean Dagnan-Bouveret

The story is based on an 18th century novel by Abbé Prévost called, The Story of the Chevalier des Grieux and Manon Lescaut. Hence, our identity of the two subjects in the painting– the man, Chevalier des Grieux, and the woman, Manon Lescaut. The story goes as follows: Chevalier des Grieux was a young seminary student of noble birth (basically he was a rich guy studying to become a priest or something religious). He fell deeply in love with Manon Lescaut, a mysterious courtesan (prostitute). Clearly not the same class here, it seems like their relationship is off to a rough start. Manon Lescaut is then deported to New Orleans because she’s a prostitute, and Chevalier ds Grieux being the dedicated lover he is, follows her there. 

In New Orleans, they pretend to be married and it seems like all is well and happy. Unfortunately, happiness is not fated for them because their ruse is eventually revealed. When it does, the nephew of the state governor finds a fancy to Manon Lescaut. Obviously Chevalier des Grieux is like no way am I letting some other guy get with my girl so like any sane man back then, he challenges the new guy to a duel and knocks him out. Believing he killed the guy, the couple flees into Louisiana wilderness. 

Even more unfortunate, they are definitely no Lewis and Clark, and Manon Lescaut ends up dying of either exhaustion or exposure. This moment is captured in the painting, where a devastated Chevalier des Grieux is seen digging her grave in the sand next to her. Afterwards, he buries her and lays down beside her to die too. 

There’s just so much contrast to this painting that makes it so beautiful. The darkening clouds atop the calm desert, his dark expression versus her peaceful one, even the pastel colors of her dress in comparison to the dark coat laid beneath her. Side note, I didn’t even notice this until I started typing but he placed down his coat beneath her so that she wouldn’t get too messy???? Are you kidding me? I love them so much. 

There is always a certain satisfaction I get from finding paintings in which humans are so… human. Love, and looking for love I think are one of the purest parts of human beings. Not just romantically, but looking for little pieces of care in everything around us placed by someone along the way on their own journey. When I look at this painting, I immediately think: Is it better to live a loveless life, or die with a full heart? If I knew, for certain, I would never find love in the world again, would I live it? Would that even be living? 

Source:

  • https://rauantiques.com/blogs/canvases-carats-and-curiosities/genre-paintings

Evolving Ideas: The True Crime Timeline

Theme:

How the views surrounding true crime have changed alongside its representation in media. The objective will be to cover what true crime originally started out as, the early foundations of true crime, the shift in fear to idolization of criminals, and modern-day/future implications for the genre of true crime.

*While these are specific artifacts included, they are subject to change as more research is done and the projects become more refined.

 Turning Point 1: Pre-True Crime (1500s-1700s)

**Note: Something that is particularly frustrating about this time period is that there is mentions of the earliest forms of true crimes originating during this time, however I can’t find a specific artifact about them. For example, a prominent form of true crime existed in the form of ballads which originated in Britain, Ireland, Scotland and Scandinavia in the 16th and 17th centuries, yet there isn’t a specific name for those, only ones that came afterwards and were inspired by them. I will name general and specific examples, although the specifics are from a different time period because the original is yet to be found.

  • Gen. Ballads (16-17 century): Originating in Britain, Ireland, Scotland, and Scandinavia
  • Ballad (180os): Omie Wise’s Ballad
  • Ballad (1700s): Pretty Polly

Turning Point 2: Literary Crime (1800s-1900s)

True crime has begun to turn towards viewing the subject as something of interest. It is now stemming beyond facts and is exploring societal, scientific, and aesthetic implications.

  • Essay (1827): On Murder Considered as one of the Fine Arts by Thomas De Quincey
  • Pamphlet (1850): Trial of Professor John W. Webster

**Notable cases at the time: Lizzie Borden

Turning Point 3: Prime Time for Crime (1900s-2000s)

This era has not only some of the most popular cases and names of true crime killers we know today, but also shows the emergence of establishing the modern style of the genre and the pathway into profitability.

  • Novel (1965): In Cold Blood by Truman Capote
  • Novel (1974): Helter Skelter by Vincent Bugliosi
  • Television (began 1996): Forensic Files

**Notable cases at the time: Charles MansonZodiac KillerJohn Wayne Gacy

Turning Point 4: The Future of True Crime (2000s-Present)

The most current and recognizable form of true crime. Almost everything containing true crime retains a profit, and most often does not use those profits in the favor of the victims or their families.

  • Podcast (2017): Crime Junkies
  • Netflix Movie (2019): Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile
  • Netflix Series (2022): Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story

Sources:

  • https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/topics/murder-pamphlets/webster-2_101594012-sm.html
  • https://crimereads.com/a-brief-history-of-the-rise-and-evolution-of-true-crime-books/
  • https://www.texasghosttour.com/the-history-of-true-crime-how-the-genre-has-evolved-over-time
  • https://daily.jstor.org/bloody-history-of-true-crime-genre/
  • https://augustaartsandculture.org/omie-wises-ballad-visiting-the-grave-dedicated-to-naomi-wise/#:~:text=Wise’s%20murder%20is%20preserved%20in,churches%20still%20bear%20her%20name.
  • https://daily.jstor.org/the-murder-ballad-was-the-original-true-crime-podcast/

Live Laugh Love Potatoes

When we think of Van Gogh, the first paintings that usually come to mind are The Starry Night, Vase with Fifteen Sunflowers, and Van Gogh self-portrait. Those paintings were good, sure. But Van Gogh himself didn’t consider them his best works. In fact, he thought of The Starry Night to be a failure. His masterpiece, in his opinion, was The Potato Eaters. 

Created in 1885, the potato eaters depicts a group of 5 lower-class citizens huddled together around a square table eating potatoes. Four of them were females, and one of them was male. The overall painting was very dark, the only source of light being the dim overhead lantern. Yet in that darkness, there is a certain highlight to the faces of these people, a sense of intimacy portrayed by the closeness of the subjects as well as the shadows they reside in. 

You may notice that this painting does look a little different from classic Van Gogh paintings. It doesn’t quite have his full style that he is known for, but still has that aspect of him that can be felt in the painting through its imperfections. At the time of its creation, Van Gogh had only recently begun to paint. He was still getting a feel for his art and style, and The Potato Eaters was one he trained a lot for. He did practice versions of the painting before he had done the final version, as well as a multitude of studies and practicing of various subjects (heads, hands, portraits of local farm laborers) in order to get it right. 

In a way, The Potato Eaters means so much to Van Gogh because it was a reflection on his own life. He wanted the painting to depict the hard parts of country life, making the peasants’ faces look coarse and bony, the hands hard from working. He wanted them to be a reflection of the very same potatoes that they had cultivated from the ground, which explains the earthy color scheme he used for the figures. All of this is to show the lives of poor people whose lives reflected his own– riddled with hard times, worn by the stress and harshness of the world, but those who find care and beauty in what they have created. 

Not so surprising, the painting wasn’t a fan favorite. Even his own friend and fellow painter, Anthon van Rappard told him, “You could do better than this.” And Rappard was right! Van Gogh did do better a couple years later. Albeit Van Gogh himself didn’t think so. He continued to believe that it was his best work, even after his releases of the iconic paintings we remembered today. Thankfully, the art community today largely regards The Potato Eaters as Van Gogh’s first masterpiece, which is good enough for everyone. 

 

Sources:

Talk About Giant Gummy Lizards

Have you ever been scammed out of Penn State football tickets? Thankfully that has never happened to me, but I know for a few, up to hundreds of dollars have been lost to petty thieves looking to profit off the misfortunate. The sad fact is, scammers are everywhere. They run through phone lines, social media, group me chats, text messages, and most commonly of all, emails. 

When realizing we’re trying to be scammed, most of us either block the sender or delete the message and move on with our day. But what exactly happens when we answer them? In my favorite Ted Talk by James Veitch, he does exactly that. 

Aside from the topic itself being attention grabbing, Veitch’s Ted Talk itself is magnifying in a way. He captivates the audience from the jump, sharing laughs and a few quips, never losing attention or interest. The information, while not the most scholarly or complex of a topic, is compelling. It is a topic that everyone is familiar with, but unique enough that it is memorable and fresh. In relation to his topic and information, it created a more relaxed atmosphere. It lacked the stern formality of a speech and made Veitch become approachable and relatable. The viewers listened to him, not because he was informative, but because he was understandable. 

The most effective part of his Ted Talk, however, was his delivery. His tone wasn’t flat, it carried emotion (that was easily reflected onto his face) to make it feel almost like it was story-telling which was emphasized with his arm movements. His facial expressions during certain moments emulated a more dramatic version of what it felt like in the moment of those emails. Especially his usage of pauses, it allowed him to create suspense for the audience, and to really play his jokes out in the most effective manner. 

If there is one takeaway I have from his Ted Talk, it is to be more comfortable with the audience. In a Ted Talk, information is more easily digested when the viewers see you as you, as one of them, and not someone who is just here to lecture for 10 minutes. My goal is to try and reflect his gestures and incorporation of emotions, especially since in my last speech, I feel as if I was really lacking in eye contact with the audience (since I admittedly stared at my presentation more than the people). If you have the time, I seriously recommend watching James Veitch’s Ted Talk, it was hilarious (thank you mom for the recommendation). 

Source:

 

Duty To Die

Hell was raining down all around. The cries and screams of the fearful overshadowed the sound of thudding bodies hitting the floor. A once magnificent city, now covered in ash and fire. Some looked on in fear. Others were running for their lives. Even moments away from death, there was but one that remained tall and strong and unmoved — a loyal soldier dedicated to his post.

Pompeii. You know them, you love them, they’re our favorite ashy city preserved under ash and lava. Most famously known for the casts of the people’s remains, the overall tragedy that had occurred had largely been overshadowed by somewhat morbid curiosity. When we really break down what happened however, it does become a little more melancholy. Around 2,000 people died in the city, with 16,000 people dying in other towns and villages in the nearby regions. Just seeing the cast of the bodies of young children curled up next to their mothers or fathers (or various relatives), weighs heavy in the heart and reminds of the real fear these people must’ve felt.

Now imagine you were there, present in the city as it erupted into flames and ash. It seems pretty obvious that the best course of action would be to flee, to run away and fight to survive. As the saying goes, “When the going gets tough, the tough get going.” Well, it seems that was not the case for this soldier (even though he really should’ve). In the excavation process of Pompeii, a skeleton was found wearing a full set of armor right next to one of the gates leading into the city. Romanticists believe that this loyal soldier had been left behind in the terror and confusion occurring during the destruction of the city. With no order to quit his post, he remained faithful to his duty, even though he was staring death right in the face.

Enter Edward Poynter, 1865. The painting, named Faithful Unto Death, is directly inspired from that discovery of the armored skeleton. Depicted is a lone sentinel, staring up into the sky, watching and unwavering as people are falling all around him. The harsh red and orange tones that encompass the whole painting set in the unease and the anxious waiting for the fate of the soldier. The background contributes to the imagery of chaos, showing coins and valuables scattered on the ground, people trying desperately to save themselves and their possessions. Despite his fear that is painted on his face, the chaos of the people around him, the overwhelming urge to run that was coursing through his mind, his body and stance show the opposite. He stands tall and upright, arms poised and strongly clenched to his weapon. Although he could’ve abandoned his post, he decides to remain faithful to his duty just as he always had, even though it would be the last thing he would do.

This idea of absolute devotion to duty and honor was especially prized during Victorian imperialist Britain, making this painting one of the most famous Victorian paintings. From a military standpoint, it makes sense. You are expected to die if your commander tells you to. Your loyalty to the group and devotion to your job is what is expected, not your duty to your life. Honestly, it makes me respect the strong will of military members even more after seeing this painting, it takes nerves of steel to go toe-to-toe with death and be willing to lose.

Sources: 

True Crime: Gone too far?

Isn’t it disturbing that serial killers are household names? Names such as Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy, and Richard Ramirez are sure to be recognized by almost anyone you speak to, but why? 

This issue falls under the broad category of true crime which I will be discussing further in the future Unit 2 projects. True crime is one of the most sensationalized topics in the media, sometimes a bit too sensationalized. My focus will not just be on how the medium used to talk about serial killers has changed (ex: newspaper → Netflix shows) but also how through their sensationalism, the public’s view has also changed from fear to idolization. 

Turning Points #1: 1500s-1700s

I still need to do a lot more research on this topic, but from what I’ve picked up so far it was just early publications in the 1500s-1700s that ranged from pamphlets to ballads to books. It also didn’t quite have that uniformed sensationalist vibe to it yet, it differed from person to person whether it was presented dramatically, or spiritually, or even state propaganda, a very clear distinction from how the true crime media is presented today. I haven’t picked out any specific artifacts for this turning point yet, but I will definitely grab some examples from each (pamphlet, book, ballad). example of a pamphlet

Turning Point #2: 1880-1900

The second turning point I’d pick was when newspapers were prime. I’m still picking and choosing which specific examples and artifacts will have the right details, but a specific example I’ll settle on for now is Jack the Ripper, one of the oldest serial killers and also very much shadowed in mystery. The main takeaway here is how Jack the Ripper was viewed at the time, and how he (but also could possibly be she no one really knows) was shown to the public that made them so memorable compared to earlier reports on true crime during the 1700s. The usage of newspapers will especially be a key feature.  

Turning Point #3: 1970-80

The third turning point would be around when Ted Bundy was active. He will be my main artifact for this turning point as a prime example of becoming completely sensationalized as well as almost revered due to his appearance on television. In comparison to Jack the Ripper or even just some of the early pamphlets on criminals, Ted Bundy and his exposure in television sort of cemented him as a household figure. Not only that, but his perception to the general public was completely mismatched with who he was— a monster. People were sending him love letters while families were mourning the losses of their daughters. How could such a drastic change happen? That is what I intend to explore. 

Turning Point #4: 2000s-current

Finally, the modern introduction of movies and film. I could go into Netflix or other popular streaming services or solely stay fixated on podcasts, but any of the modern routes are definitely a possibility to delve into. The show about Jeffrey Dahmer on Netflix happens to be the newest (that I’m aware of) which is a strong possibility to be used. Once again, like with Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer’s public perception in modern times has also become idolized. Not only that, but the show didn’t even compensate the victim’s families. They are broadcasting the horrific murder of their loved ones, but not for the sake of spreading awareness but to get attention and money. 

Overall, this focus shift from informing and warning the public of these killers to sensationalizing and profiting off the fame of serial killers is what I intend to explore while I’m researching for the upcoming projects. I’m open to any suggestions for possible routes or more artifacts to include in each turning point! I know this was a lot so thank you for taking the time to read all of it. 

Sources:

  • https://daily.jstor.org/bloody-history-of-true-crime-genre/
  • https://www.texasghosttour.com/the-history-of-true-crime-how-the-genre-has-evolved-over-time
Skip to toolbar