Woman withdraws court plea alleging Ravi Kishan as the father of her daughter

On Friday, Aparna Soni requested to withdraw her plea in the Bombay High Court, seeking to dismiss an FIR filed against her and her family by Ravi Kishan’s wife, Preeti Shukla. The FIR, filed on April 16, 2024, at Hazratganj police station in Lucknow, accused them of blackmail and extortion attempts totaling Rs 20 crore. Soni had previously claimed Ravi Kishan as the biological father of her daughter. The High Court responded to Soni's withdrawal request in writing, acknowledging her concerns about legal repercussions in Uttar Pradesh. Earlier in the week, she and her family were granted transit anticipatory bail for two weeks, preparing to approach a Lucknow court for further protection from arrest.
Woman withdraws court plea alleging Ravi Kishan as the father of her daughter
Aparna Soni requested to withdraw her plea in the Bombay High Court, which alleged that Ravi Kishan is the father of her daughter, according to India Today. The petition sought to dismiss an FIR filed against Soni and her family by Ravi Kishan’s wife, Preeti Shukla. The High Court responded to Soni’s request in writing and disposed of the petition on Friday.
On April 16, 2024, Preeti Shukla filed an FIR against six people, including Aparna Soni, her husband Rajesh Soni, and her daughter Shinova Soni, at Hazratganj police station in Lucknow.
1x1 polls
The complaint accused them of blackmail and threatening Ravi and his family, allegedly attempting to extort Rs 20 crore. Soni had earlier claimed that she and the actor briefly lived together, asserting he was the biological father of her daughter.
Soni, her husband, and daughter filed a plea in the Bombay High Court to cancel the FIR. However, since the FIR was filed in Lucknow, it is not under the jurisdiction of the High Court.
On Friday, the High Court bench, comprising Justices Ajay Gadkari and Neela Gokhale, acknowledged a letter from Aparna Soni to the court registry. In the letter, she stated her intention to withdraw the petition, citing concerns that its continuation could impact her ability to seek legal recourse in Uttar Pradesh.
The letter from Aparna Soni mentioned the involvement of two other petitioners. Her advocate stated that legal documents for all three had been returned and requested to withdraw the plea, citing its lack of maintainability. The bench allowed Aparna Soni to withdraw the plea based on these points.
Earlier in the week, Aparna Soni and her family were granted transit anticipatory bail for two weeks by another bench of the High Court. They intend to seek further protection from arrest in the case by approaching a court in Lucknow.

author
About the Author
TOI Entertainment Desk

The TOI Entertainment Desk is a dynamic and dedicated team of journalists, working tirelessly to bring the pulse of the entertainment world straight to the readers of The Times of India. No red carpet goes unrolled, no stage goes dark - our team spans the globe, bringing you the latest scoops and insider insights from Bollywood to Hollywood, and every entertainment hotspot in between. We don't just report; we tell tales of stardom and stories untold. Whether it's the rise of a new sensation or the seasoned journey of an industry veteran, the TOI Entertainment Desk is your front-row seat to the fascinating narratives that shape the entertainment landscape. Beyond the breaking news, we present a celebration of culture. We explore the intersections of entertainment with society, politics, and everyday life.

End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA