Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:18:19.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of spinal structure on quadruped bounding gait

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2022

Chen Lei Open the ORCID record for Chen Lei [Opens in a new window] ,
Chen Dongliang  and
Dong Wei
Chen Lei
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Chen Dongliang*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China
Dong Wei
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: chendongliang@hrbeu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes a robot model with multiple spines and investigates its effects on the bounding gait of quadruped robot. Contrastive tests, carried out by adding an active driving joint (ADJ) and changing the number of passive driving joints, were divided between simulation and physical. The results reveal that the spinal structure (one ADJ and several passive driving joints) is closely related to the performance parameters. Increasing the number of passive driving joints can improve the velocity and energy efficiency. This structure may have significant guidance for designing a quadruped robot.

Keywords

bounding gaitquadruped robotspine structureactive driving jointpassive driving joint
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 40 , Issue 11 , November 2022 , pp. 3911 - 3929
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cao, Q. and Poulakakis, I., “On the Energetics of Quadrupedal Bounding with and without Torso Compliance,” In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Chicago, IL (2014) pp. 4901–4906.Google Scholar
Bakırcıoğlu, V., Şen, M. A. and Kalyoncu, M., “Adaptive Neural-Network Based Fuzzy Logic (ANFIS) Based Trajectory Controller Design for One Leg of a Quadruped Robot,” In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechatronics and Control engineering, ACM, Venice, Italy (2016) pp. 82–85.Google Scholar
Bazeille, S., Barasuol, V., Focchi, M., Havoutis, I., Frigerio, M., Buchli, J., Caldwell, D. G. and Semini, C., “Quadruped robot trotting over irregular terrain assisted by stereo-vision,” Intel. Serv. Robot. 7(2), 67–77 (2014).10.1007/s11370-014-0147-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H.-W., Park, S. I. and Kim, S., “Variable-Speed Quadrupedal Bounding Using Impulse Planning: Untethered High-Speed 3D Running of MIT Cheetah 2,” In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA (2015) pp. 1050–4729.Google Scholar
Park, H. W., Wensing, P. M. and Kim, S., “High-speed bounding with the MIT Cheetah 2: Control design and experiments,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 36(2), 167–192 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, K. F.. Locomotion Experiments on a Planar Quadruped Robot with Articulated Spine (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, 1996) pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
Haueisen, B. M.. Investigation of an Articulated Spine in a Quadruped Robotic System (The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2011) pp. 20–40.Google Scholar
Chen, D., Liu, Q., Dong, L., Wang, H. and Zhang, Q., “Effect of spine motion on mobility in quadruped running,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 27(6), 1150–1156 (2014).10.3901/CJME.2014.0724.124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrand, M., “Motions of the running cheetah and horse,” J. Mammal. 40(4), 481–495 (1959).10.2307/1376265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, A. W., “The functions of the lumbar spine during stepping in the cat,” J. Morphol. 165(1), 55–66 (1980).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, N. and Hackert, R., “Sagittal spine movements of small therian mammals during asymmetrical gaits,” J. Exp. Biol. 209(19), 3925–3939 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertram, J. E. A. and Gutmann, A., “Motions of the running horse and cheetah revisited: fundamental mechanics of the transverse and rotary gallop,” J. R. Soc. Interface 6(35), 549–559 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, R., Dimery, N. J. and Ker, R. F., “Elastic structures in the back and their role in galloping in some mammals,” J. Zool. 207(4), 467–482 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J.. How Animals Move (Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 1960) pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
Pouya, S., Khodabakhsh, M., Moeckel, R. and Ijspeert, A., “Role of Spine Compliance and Actuation in the Bounding Performance of Quadruped Robots,” 7th Dynamic Walking Conference , USA (May 2012).Google Scholar
Chen, D. L., Li, N. J., Wang, H. and Chen, L., “Effect of flexible spine motion on energy efficiency in quadruped running,” J. Bionic Eng. 14(4), 716–725 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boszczyk, B. M., Boszczyk, A. A. and Putz, R., “Comparative and functional anatomy of the mammalian lumbar spine,” Anat. Rec. 264(2), 157–168 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lei, J., Yu, H. and Wang, T., “Dynamic bending of bionic flexible body driven by pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs) for spinning gait of quadruped robot,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 29(1), 11–20 (2016).10.3901/CJME.2015.1016.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pusey, J. L., Duperret, J. M., Haynes, G. C., Knopf, R. and Koditschek, D. E., “Free-Standing Leaping Experiments with a Power Autonomous Elastic-Spined Quadruped,” Proc. SPIE 8741 87410W (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takuma, T., Ikeda, M. and Masuda, T., “Facilitating Multi-Modal Locomotion in a Quadruped Robot Utilizing Passive Oscillation of the Spine Structure,” In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Taipei, Taiwan (2010) pp. 4940–4945.Google Scholar
Eckert, P., Spröwitz, A., Witte, H. and Ijspeert, A. J.. “Comparing the Effect of Different Spine and Leg Designs for a Small Bounding Quadruped Robot,” In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA (2015) pp. 3128–3133.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Zhang, T., Wei, X., Long, Y. and Wang, S., “Dynamic characteristics and stability criterion of rotary galloping gait with an articulated passive spine joint,” Adv. Robot. 31(4), 168–183 (2017).10.1080/01691864.2016.1256230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spröwitz, A., Tuleu, A. and Vespignani, M., “Towards dynamic trot gait locomotion: Design, control, and experiments with Cheetah-cub, a compliant quadruped robot,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 32(8), 932–950 (2013).10.1177/0278364913489205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoramshahi, M., Spröwitz, A., Tuleu, A. and Ahmadabadi, M. N., “Benefits of an Active Spine Supported Bounding Locomotion with a Small Compliant Quadruped Robot,” In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Karlsruhe, Germany (2013) pp. 3329–3334.Google Scholar
Ijspeert, A. J., Crespi, A. and Ryczko, D., “From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model,” Science 315(5817), 1416–1420 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulakakis, I., Smith, J. A. and Buehler, M., “Modeling and experiments of untethered quadrupedal running with a bounding gait: The Scout II robot,” J. Robot. Res. 24(4), 239–256 (2005).10.1177/0278364904050917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkertsma, G. A., Kim, S. and Stramigioli, S., “Parallel Stiffness in a Bounding Quadruped with Flexible Spine,” In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, Portugal (2012) pp. 2210–2215.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., Poulakakis, I. and Trentini, M., “Bounding with active wheels and liftoff angle velocity adjustment,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 29(4), 414–427 (2010).10.1177/0278364909336807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çulha, U.. An Actuated Flexible Spinal Mechanism for a Bounding Quadrupedal Robot Thesis (Bilkent University, 2012).Google Scholar
Haueisen, B. M.. Investigation of an Articulated Spine in a Quadruped Robotic System Dissertations & Theses (Gradworks, 2011).Google Scholar
Herr, H. M., Huang, G. T. and McMahon, T. A., “A model of scale effects in mammalian quadrupedal running,” J. Exp. Biol. 205(7), 959–967 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoramshahi, M., Jalaly Bidgoly, H., Shafiee, S., Asaei, A., Ijspeert, A. J. and Nili Ahmadabadi, M., “Piecewise linear spine for speed-energy efficiency trade-off in quadruped robots,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 61(12), 1350–1359 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D., Li, N., Liu, G., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Liu, C. and Zhuang, B., “Effects of spine motion on foot slip in quadruped bounding,” Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2018, 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8097371 Google ScholarPubMed