Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:32:08.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adopting trust and assurance as indicators for the reassignment of responsibilities in multi-agent systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2015

Benjamin Gâteau ,
Moussa Ouedraogo ,
Christophe Feltus ,
Guy Guemkam ,
Grégoire Danoy ,
Marcin Seredynski ,
Samee U. Khan ,
Djamel Khadraoui  and
Pascal Bouvry
Benjamin Gâteau
Affiliation:
Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, 29 Avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: benjamin.gateu@tudor.lu
Moussa Ouedraogo
Affiliation:
Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, 29 Avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: benjamin.gateu@tudor.lu
Christophe Feltus
Affiliation:
Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, 29 Avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: benjamin.gateu@tudor.lu
Guy Guemkam
Affiliation:
Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, 29 Avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: benjamin.gateu@tudor.lu
Grégoire Danoy
Affiliation:
CSC Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, 6 rue Coudenhove Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: gregoire.danoy@uni.lu, pascal.bouvry@uni.lu
Marcin Seredynski
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg, 6 rue Coudenhove Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: marcin.seredynski@uni.lu
Samee U. Khan
Affiliation:
NDSU-CIIT Green Computing and Communications Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA e-mail: samee.khan@ndsu.edu
Djamel Khadraoui
Affiliation:
Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, 29 Avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: benjamin.gateu@tudor.lu
Pascal Bouvry
Affiliation:
CSC Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, 6 rue Coudenhove Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg e-mail: gregoire.danoy@uni.lu, pascal.bouvry@uni.lu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multi-agent systems have been widely used in the literature, including for the monitoring of distributed systems. However, one of the unresolved issues in this technology remains in the reassignment of the responsibilities of monitoring agents when some of them become unable to meet their obligations. This paper proposes a new approach for solving this problem based on (a) the gathering of evidence on whether the agent can or cannot fulfil the tasks it has been assigned and (b) the reassignment of the task to alternative agents using their trust level as a selection parameter. A weather station case study is proposed as an instantiation of the proposed model.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 30 , Issue 2: Intelligent Computing in Large–Scale Systems , March 2015 , pp. 187 - 200
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abielmona, R. S., Petriu, E., Harb, M. & Wesolkowski, S. 2011. Mission-driven robotic intelligent sensor agents for territorial security. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 6(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baig, Z. A. 2012. Multi-agent systems for protecting critical infrastructures: a survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35(3), 1151–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissier, O. & Gâteau, B. 2007. Normative multi-agent organisations: modeling, support and control. In Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar 07122: Normative Multi-agent Systems. Boella, G., v. d. Torre, L. & Verhagen, H. (eds.). Vol. II. ISSN 1862-4405.Google Scholar
Boudaoud, K., Labiod, H., Boutaba, R. & Guessoum, Z. 2000. Network security management with intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS 2000). IEEE/IFIP, 579–592.Google Scholar
Coutinho, L., Sichman, J. & Boissier, O. 2007. Organisational modeling dimensions for multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop Agent Organizations: Models and Simulations (AOMS@IJCAI07). Dignum, V., Dignum, F. & Matson, E. (eds).Google Scholar
Demazeau, Y. 1995. From interactions to collective behaviour in agent-based systems. In Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Cognitive Science, 117–132.Google Scholar
Esteva, M., Padget, J. & Sierra, C. 2002. Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VIII, LNAI 2333, 348–366. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feltus, C., Khadraoui, D. & Aubert, J. 2010. A security decision-reaction architecture for heterogeneous distributed network. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (‘ARES 2010 – The International Dependability Conference’). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feltus, C. & Petit, M. 2009. Building a responsibility model including accountability, capability and commitment. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (‘ARES 2009 – The International Dependability Conference’). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferber, J. & Gutknecht, O. 1998. A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998). IEEE, 128–135.Google Scholar
Ferber, J., Michel, F. & Baez, J. 2004. AGRE: integrating environments with organisations. In Environments for Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS 3374, 48–56. Springer.Google Scholar
Gâteau, B. 2007. Modélisation et Supervision d’Institutions Multi-Agents. PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne.Google Scholar
Gâteau, B., Boissier, O., Khadraoui, D. & Dubois, E. 2005. M OISEInst: an organizational model for specifying rights and duties of autonomous agents. In 1st International Workshop on Coordination and Organisation (CoOrg 2005) affiliated with the 7th International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, Namur Belgium. V. d. Torre, L. & Boella, G. (eds).Google Scholar
Gâteau, B., Boissier, O., Khadraoui, D. & Dubois, E. 2007. Controlling an interactive game with a multi-agent based normative organisational model. In Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II. LNCS 4386, 86–100. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gâteau, B., Khadraoui, D. & Feltus, C. 2009. Multi-agents system service based platform in telecommunication security incident reaction. In Proceedings of the Global Information Infrastructure Symposium (GIIS 2009). IEEE, 1–6.Google Scholar
Guemkam, G., Feltus, C., Schmitt, P., Bonhomme, C., Khadraoui, D. & Guessoum, Z. 2011. Reputation based dynamic responsibility to agent assignment for critical infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2. IEEE, 272–275.Google Scholar
Hübner, J., Sichman, J. & Boissier, O. 2002. A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems. In Proceedings of the 16th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA 2002). LNAI 2507, 118–128. Springer.Google Scholar
Jennings, N. R. 1999. Agent-oriented software engineering. In Proceedings of the 9th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW 1999), LNCS 1647, 1–7. Springer.Google Scholar
Kitio, R., Boissier, O., Hübner, J. F. & Ricci, A. 2007. Organisational artifacts and agents for open multi-agent organisations: ‘giving the power back to the agents’. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems III (Coin 2007), 171–186.Google Scholar
Kolaczek, G. & Juszczyszyn, K. 2007. Traffic and attack pattern analysis for multiagent distributed intrusion detection system. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE 2007). Atlantis Press, 733–739.Google Scholar
Kollingbaum, M. J., Norman, T. J., Preece, A. & Sleeman, D. 2006. Norm refinement – informing the re-negotiation of contracts. In Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II, LNCS 4386. Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N. & Matson, E (eds). Springer, 245–258.Google Scholar
Lesser, V. K., Decker, W. T., Carver, N., Garvey, A., Horling, B., Neiman, D., Podorozhny, R., NagendraPrasad, M., Raja, A., Vincent, R., Xuan, P. & Zhang, X. 2004. Evolution of the GPGP/TAEMS domain-independent coordination framework. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 9(1), 87–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. & Hoang, D. 2009. A new security scheme for e-health system. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, 361–366.Google Scholar
Ouedraogo, M., Khadraoui, D., De Remont, B., Dubois, E. & Mouratidis, H. 2008. Deployment of a security assurance monitoring framework for telecommunication service infrastructure on a voip service. In Proceedings of the New Technologies, Mobility and Security Conference (NTMS ‘08). IEEE, 1–5.Google Scholar
Pham, N., Baud, L., Bellot, P. & Riguidel, M. 2008. A near real-time system for security assurance assessment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection. IEEE, 152–160.Google Scholar
Pynadath, D. & Tambe, M. 2003. An automated teamwork infrastructure for heterogeneous software agents and humans. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7(1–2), 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, P., Bonhomme, C., Aubert, J. & Gâteau, B. 2011. Programming electronic institutions with utopia. Information Systems Evolution 72, 122–135.Google Scholar
Servin, A. & Kudenko, D. 2008. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for intrusion detection. In Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems III. LNCS 4865, 211–223. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. P. 2008. Semantical considerations on dialectical and practical commitments. In Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), vol. 1. AAAI Press, 176–181.Google Scholar
Sommerville, I. 2007. Models for responsibility assignment. In Responsibility and Dependable Systems. Dewsbury, G. & Dobson, J. (eds). Springer, 165–186.Google Scholar
Stahl, B. 2006. Accountability and reflective responsibility in information systems. In The Information Society: Emerging Landscapes. Zielinski, C., Duquenoy, P. & Kimppa, K. (eds). Springer, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, M. 2002. An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar