Top > JRM > Size Effect on Call Properties of Japanese Tree Frogs Revealed ...

single-rb.php

JRM Vol.29 No.1 pp. 247-254
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2017.p0247
(2017)

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 1,489

Size Effect on Call Properties of Japanese Tree Frogs Revealed by Audio-Processing Technique

Ikkyu Aihara*1, Ryu Takeda*2, Takeshi Mizumoto*3, Takuma Otsuka*4, and Hiroshi G. Okuno*5

*1Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba
1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan

*2The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University
8-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan

*3Honda Research Institute Japan Co., Ltd.
8-1 Honcho, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0188, Japan

*4NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation
2-4 Hikaridai, Seikacho, Kyoto 619-0237, Japan

*5Graduate Program for Embodiment Informatics, Waseda University
Lambdax Bldg 3F, 2-4-12 Okubo, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-0072, Japan

Received:
July 20, 2016
Accepted:
September 6, 2016
Published:
February 20, 2017
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
animal behavior, frog chorus, independent component analysis, microphone array, advertisement call
Abstract
Sensing the external environment is a core function of robots and autonomous mechanics. This function is useful for monitoring and analyzing the ecosystem for our deeper understanding of the nature and accomplishing the sustainable ecosystem. Here, we investigate calling behavior of male frogs by applying audio-processing technique on multiple audio data. In general, male frogs call from their breeding site, and a female frog approaches one of the males by hearing their calls. First, we conducted an indoor experiment to record spontaneous calling behavior of three male Japanese tree frogs, and then separated their call signals according to independent component analysis. The analysis of separated signals shows that chorus size (i.e., the number of calling frogs) has a positive effect on call number, inter-call intervals, and chorus duration. We speculate that a competition in a large chorus encourages the male frogs to make their call properties more attractive to conspecific females.
Calling behavior of a male Japanese Tree Frog

Calling behavior of a male Japanese Tree Frog

Cite this article as:
I. Aihara, R. Takeda, T. Mizumoto, T. Otsuka, and H. Okuno, “Size Effect on Call Properties of Japanese Tree Frogs Revealed by Audio-Processing Technique,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29 No.1, pp. 247-254, 2017.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] H. R. Everett, “Sensors for Mobile Robots,” CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995.
  2. [2] S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox, “Probabilistic Robotics,” The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005.
  3. [3] H. Kondo and T. Ura, “Navigation of an AUV for Investigation of Underwater Structures,” Control Engineering Practice, Vol.12, pp. 1551-1559, 2004.
  4. [4] K. Tanaka, H. Ishii, S. Kinoshita, Q. Shi, H. Sugita, S. Okabayashi, Y. Sugahara, and A. Takanishi, “Design of Operating Software and Electrical System of Mobile Robot for Environmental Monitoring,” Proc. of 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 1763-1768, 2014.
  5. [5] K. Tanaka, H. Ishii, Y. Okamoto, D. Kuroiwa, Y. Miura, D. Endo, J. Mitsuzuka, Q. Shi, S. Okabayashi, Y. Sugahara, and A. Takanishi, “Novel Method of Estimating Surface Condition for Tiny Mobile Robot to Improve Locomotion Performance,” Proc. of 2015 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6515-6520, 2015.
  6. [6] D. R. Griffin, “Listening in the Dark: The Acoustic Orientation of Bats and Men,” Yale University Press, Oxford, 1958.
  7. [7] C. K. Catchpole and P. J. B. Slater, “Bird Song Biological Themes and Variations,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
  8. [8] E. Fujioka, I. Aihara, S. Watanabe, M. Sumiya, S. Hiryu, J. A. Simmons, H. Riquimaroux, and Y. Watanabe, “Rapid Shifts of Sonar Attention by Pipistrellus abramus during Natural Hunting for Multiple Prey,” J. of Acoustic Society of America, Vol.136, pp. 3389-3400, 2014.
  9. [9] R. Suzuki, S. Matsubayashi, K. Nakadai, and H. G. Okuno, “Localizing Bird Songs Using an Open Source Robot Audition System with a Microphone Array,” Proc. of Interspeech 2016, pp. 2026-2030, 2016.
  10. [10] H. C. Gerhardt and F. Huber, “Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans,” The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002.
  11. [11] K. D. Wells, “The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians,” The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007.
  12. [12] P. M. Narins, A. S. Feng, and R. Fay, “Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians,” Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2007.
  13. [13] N. Maeda and M. Matsui, “Frogs and Toads of Japan,” Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 1999.
  14. [14] I. Aihara, R. Takeda, T. Mizumoto, T. Otsuka, T. Takahashi, H. G. Okuno, and K. Aihara. “Complex and Transitive Synchronization in a Frustrated System of Calling Frogs,” Physical Review E, Vol.83, 031913, 2011.
  15. [15] H. C. Gerhardt, S. D. Tanner, C. M. Corrigan, and H. C. Walton, “Female Preference Function Based on Call Duration in the Gray Tree Frogs (Hyla versicolor),” Behavioral Ecology, Vol.11, pp. 663-669, 2000.
  16. [16] M. D. Jennions, P. R. Y. Backwell, and N. I. Passmore, “Repeatability of Mate Choice: the Effect of Size in the African Painted Reed Frog, Hyperolius marmoratus,” Animal Behavior, Vol.49, pp. 181-186, 1995.
  17. [17] M. J. Ryan, and A. Keddy-Hector, “Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases,” American Naturalist, Vol.139, pp. S4-S35, 1992.
  18. [18] R. Takeda, K. Nakadai, T. Takahashi, K. Komatani, T. Ogata, and H. G. Okuno, “Efficient Blind Dereverberation and Echo Cancellation based on Independent Component Analysis for Actual Acoustic Signals,” Neural Computation, Vol.24, Issue 1, pp. 234-272, 2012.
  19. [19] H. Sawada, R. Mukai, and S. Araki, “Polar Coordinate based Nonlinear Function for Frequency-Domain Blind Source Separation,” IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, Vol.E86-A, No.3, pp. 505-510, 2003.
  20. [20] A. Hyvarinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja, “Independent Component Analysis,” Wiley-Interscience, NY, 2001.
  21. [21] N. Murata and S. Ikeda, “An Approach to Blind Source Separation Based on Temporal Structure of Speech Signals,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 41, pp. 1-24, 2001.
  22. [22] H. Sawada, R. Mukai, S. Araki, and S. Makino, “Polar Coordinate based Nonlinear Function for Frequency Domain Blind Source Separation,” IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, Vol.E86-A, No.3, pp. 590-596, 2003.
  23. [23] I. Aihara, T. Mizumoto, H. Awano, and H. G. Okuno, “Call Alternation between Specific Pairs of Male Frogs Revealed by a Sound-Imaging Method in Their Natural Habitat,” Proc. of Interspeech 2016, pp. 2597-2601, 2016.
  24. [24] J. F. Faraway, “Extending the Linear Model with R,” CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006.
  25. [25] I. Aihara, “Modeling Synchronized Calling Behavior of Japanese Tree Frogs,” Physical Review E, Vol.80, 011918, 2009.
  26. [26] A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, “Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
  27. [27] T. Mizumoto, I. Aihara, T. Otsuka, R. Takeda, K. Aihara, and H. G. Okuno, “Sound Imaging of Nocturnal Animal Calls in Their Natural Habitat,” J. of Comparative Physiology A, Vol.197, pp. 915-921, 2011.
  28. [28] I. Aihara, T. Mizumoto, T. Otsuka, H. Awano, K. Nagira, H. G. Okuno, and K. Aihara, “Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Collective Frog Choruses Examined by Mathematical Modeling and Field Observations,” Scientific Reports, Vol.4, 3891, 2014.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 19, 2024