Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T22:07:31.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the relationship between the partition property and the weak partition property for normal ultrafilters on Pκλ1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Julius B. Barbanel*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Union College, Schenectady, New York 12308, E-mail: BARBANEJ@GAR.UNION.EDU

Abstract

Suppose κ is a supercompact cardinal and λ > κ. We study the relationship between the partition properly and the weak partition properly for normal ultrafilters on Pκλ. On the one hand, we show that the following statement is consistent, given an appropriate large cardinal assumption: The partition property and the weak partition properly are equivalent, there are many normal ultrafilters that satisfy these properties, and there are many normal ultrafilters that do not satisfy these properties. On the other hand, we consider the assumption that, for some λ > κ, there exists a normal ultrafilter U on Pκλ such that U satisfies the weak partition property but does not satisfy the partition property. We show that this assumption is implied by the assertion that there exists a cardinal γ > κ such that γ is γ+-supercompact, and, assuming the GCH, it implies the assertion that there exists a cardinal γ > κ such that γ is a measurable cardinal with a normal ultrafilter concentrating on measurable cardinals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We would like to thank the referee for a number of useful suggestions on a previous version of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barbanel, J. B., Supercompact cardinals, trees of normal ultrafilters, and the partition property, this Journal, vol. 51 (1986), pp. 701708.Google Scholar
[2]Baumgartner, J., Ineffability properties of cardinals I, Finite and infinite sets P. Erdos sixtieth birthday colloquium, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis Janos Bolyai, vol. 10, part I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 109130.Google Scholar
[3]Diprisco, C. A., Supercompact cardinals and a partition property, Advances in Mathematics, vol. 25 (1977), pp. 4655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kunen, K., Some remarks on theorems of Ketonen, Menas, and Solovay, unpublished handwritten manuscript, 1971.Google Scholar
[5]Kunen, K. and Pelletier, D. H., On a combinatorial property of Menas related to the partition property for measures on supercompact cardinals, this Journal, vol. 48 (1983), pp. 475481.Google Scholar
[6]Menas, T., A combinatorial property of Pκλ, this Journal, vol. 41 (1976), pp. 225234.Google Scholar
[7]Pelletier, D., The partition property for certain extendible measures on supercompact cardinals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 81 (1981), pp. 607612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Solovay, R., Reinhardt, W., and Kanamori, A., Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 13 (1978), pp. 73116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar