Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:41:39.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terminal Notions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

Jindřich Zapletal
Jindřich Zapletal*
Affiliation:
Hinman Box 6188, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USAE-mail:zapletal@dartmouth.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Certain set theoretical notions cannot be split into finer subnotions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 470 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Abraham, U. and Shelah, S., A wellorder of the reals and incompactness of L(QMM), Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 59 (1993), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Blass, A., Selective ultrafilters and homogeneity, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 38 (1988), pp. 215–255.Google Scholar
[3] Comfort, W. W. and Negrepontis, S., The theory of ultrafilters, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
[4] Devlin, K. J. and Johnsbraten, H., The Souslin problem, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 405, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
[5] Farah, I., Semiselective coideals, Mathematika, vol. 45 (1998), pp. 79–103.Google Scholar
[6] Foreman, M. and Magidor, M., Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 76 (1995), pp. 47–97.Google Scholar
[7] Jech, T., Nonprovability of Souslin's hypothesis, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae, vol. 8 (1967), pp. 291–305.Google Scholar
[8] Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[9] Kunen, K., Some points in βN, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 80 (1976), pp. 385–398.Google Scholar
[10] Laflamme, C., Forcing with filters and complete combinatorics, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 42 (1989), pp. 125–163.Google Scholar
[11] Louveau, A., Une methode topologique pour l'etude de la proprieté de Ramsey, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 23 (1976), pp. 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Shelah, S. and Zapletal, J., Canonical models for ℵ1 combinatorics, to appear in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.Google Scholar
[13] Todorcevic, S., Partition problems in topology, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1989.Google Scholar
[14] Woodin, W. H., absoluteness, circulated notes, 1985.Google Scholar
[15] Woodin, W. H., Supercompact cardinals, sets of reals and weakly homogeneous trees, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, vol. 85 (1988), pp. 6587–6591.Google Scholar
[16] Zapletal, J., Terminal notions in set theory, submitted to the Journal of Mathematical Logic.Google Scholar