Wikidata:Property proposal/numéro de parcelle

parcel number in the cadastre

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place

   Not done

Description	number identifying a particle area of land in the cadastre of a town or other locality
Represents	no label (Q108102235)
Data type	String
Example 1	Cordouan Lighthouse (Q199234) → 1 [1]
Example 2	Ancien cimetière de l'église de la Madeleine (Q26419561) → 109 [2]
Example 3	Q1520341 → 679 [3]
Example 4	Q26836639 → 476 [4]
See also	French Etalab parcel visualization code (P9643): visualization code of an Etalab cadastral parcel in France Italian cadastre code (municipality) (P806): identifier for an Italian comune in the cadastre Czech cadastral area ID (P7526): identifier for a cadastral area in the Czech Republic, conferred by 'Český úřad zeměměřický a katastrální' cadastral district
Distinct-values constraint	no

Motivation

Helps describe the location of a building. See fr:Cadastre_de_France#Foncier for its function, e.g. in France. (Add your motivation for this property here.) --- Jura 08:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Comment I believe in English this is usually called the "lot number", but we already have a property lot number (P4775) that uses that label in the context of sale of artworks. I don't know if they are close enough in meaning that P4775 would work for this purpose; possibly? ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  • They are absolutely completely different. Circeus (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  • For once, I didn't fill in the English part as I wasn't sure how to make sure we get the correct data in the field. I replaced "plan" with "cadastre" in the translation you added. Obviously, there can always be concepts with similar names that are unrelated and thus not ideal to be used in the same property. [5] might be trying to do that, but the data there is hard to understand. BTW, that property is also used for a burial plot elsewhere (instead of P:P965). --- Jura 21:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Which property would we use (as a qualifier) to note the specific cadastre (Q191072) it is part of? --Azertus (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  • There should be just one per place (in given point of time). --- Jura 13:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

  @Azertus I'm not sure about that. Should it be a text or an item-value? In general, it can be something that ends up in the reference.

  As mentioned, the location (and point in time) should allow to determine which one it is. BTW I added a few samples. --- Jura 13:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Not done - no support for the proposal --DannyS712 (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2022 (UTC)