Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CudaText: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for CudaText. |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. [[User:Xymmax|<b>Xymmax</b>]] [[User_talk:Xymmax|<small><sup>So let it be written</sup></small>]] [[Special:Contributions/Xymmax|<small><sub>So let it be done</sub></small>]] 11:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|1=CudaText}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CudaText|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March |
:{{la|1=CudaText}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CudaText|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 19#{{anchorencode:CudaText}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1191285303/cur|edits since nomination]]) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=CudaText}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=CudaText}}) |
||
I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. [[User:HyperAccelerated|HyperAccelerated]] ([[User talk:HyperAccelerated|talk]]) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. [[User:HyperAccelerated|HyperAccelerated]] ([[User talk:HyperAccelerated|talk]]) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|Internet]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|Software]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 01:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
* I oppose deleting this as it's clearly a very active project (note the forum) with some history. I know people that use it. Okay it's no notepad++ popularity wise. I also see no gain from CudaText's side as it's open source and my adblocker kicked in only for the github link (to those that don't know GitHub is a VERY popular code hosting site and this is very normal). The article is also being kept up to date. [[Special:Contributions/86.140.41.40|86.140.41.40]] ([[User talk:86.140.41.40|talk]]) 08:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Comment:''' The activity of its forum or the number of people that you know that use the software has nothing to do with whether this should be a Wikipedia article. Please read [[WP: N]]. [[User:HyperAccelerated|HyperAccelerated]] ([[User talk:HyperAccelerated|talk]]) 00:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 00:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p> |
|||
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 00:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p> |
|||
* '''Delete''': Their own website, SourceForce, Github, then discussion boards. I don't see any sites reviewing this software, or any mention of it in media we'd use as a RS. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 15:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB Oaktree b--> |
|||
* '''Delete''': with no independent sources providing SIGCOV, this fails NSOFT. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 10:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB OwenX--> |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:59, 26 March 2024
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 11:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CudaText (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I oppose deleting this as it's clearly a very active project (note the forum) with some history. I know people that use it. Okay it's no notepad++ popularity wise. I also see no gain from CudaText's side as it's open source and my adblocker kicked in only for the github link (to those that don't know GitHub is a VERY popular code hosting site and this is very normal). The article is also being kept up to date. 86.140.41.40 (talk) 08:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The activity of its forum or the number of people that you know that use the software has nothing to do with whether this should be a Wikipedia article. Please read WP: N. HyperAccelerated (talk) 00:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Their own website, SourceForce, Github, then discussion boards. I don't see any sites reviewing this software, or any mention of it in media we'd use as a RS. Oaktree b (talk) 15:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: with no independent sources providing SIGCOV, this fails NSOFT. Owen× ☎ 10:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.