Argumentum ad crumenam: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
LaaknorBot (talk | contribs) m r2.7.3rc2) (Robot: Adding zh:訴諸富貴 |
Cielquiparle (talk | contribs) +ref; more citations needed |
||
(23 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Informal fallacy}} |
|||
{{Italic title}} |
|||
{{Italic title}}{{More citations needed|date=June 2024}} |
|||
An '''''argumentum ad crumenam''''' [[logical argument|argument]], also known as '''an argument to the purse''', is a [[logical fallacy]] of concluding that a statement is correct because the speaker is rich (or that a statement is incorrect because the speaker is poor). |
|||
An '''''argumentum ad crumenam''''' [[logical argument|argument]], also known as '''an argument to the purse''', is the [[informal fallacy]] of drawing conclusions based on the speaker's financial status.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Fellmeth |first=Aaron X. |title=Guide to Latin in International Law |last2=Horwitz |first2=Maurice |date=2021 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=9780197583104 |chapter=Argumentum ad crumenam |doi=10.1093/acref/9780197583104.001.0001/acref-9780197583104-e-257}}</ref> The term generally refers to the assumption that having wealth is indicative of insight or virtue, and that poverty denotes the opposite.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
The opposite is the ''[[argumentum ad lazarum]]''. |
The opposite is the ''[[argumentum ad lazarum]]''. |
||
Examples: |
|||
==Usage== |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
From [[Tristram Shandy]] <ref> [[Laurence Sterne]]. The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. Everyman's library: New York, 1991.</ref>: "Then, added my father, making use of the argument ''Ad Crumenam'', 'I will lay twenty guineas to a single crown-piece, (which will serve to give away to ''Obadiah'' when he gets back) that this same ''Stevinus'' was some engineer or other, or has wrote something or other, either directly or indirectly, upon the science of fortification.'" |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
*[http://education.gsu.edu/spehar/FOCUS/EdPsy/misc/Fallacies.htm Georgia State University] |
|||
*[http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Logical%20Fallacies.htm Philosophical Society - logical fallacies] |
|||
{{Fallacies}} |
|||
{{Red_Herring_Fallacy}} |
|||
{{Wealth}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Argumentum Ad Crumenam}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Argumentum Ad Crumenam}} |
||
Line 25: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:Latin philosophical phrases]] |
[[Category:Latin philosophical phrases]] |
||
[[Category:Latin logical phrases]] |
[[Category:Latin logical phrases]] |
||
[[Category:Wealth]] |
|||
{{logic-stub}} |
|||
[[ca:Argumentum ad crumenam]] |
|||
[[es:Argumento ad crumenam]] |
|||
[[fa:ثروتگرایی]] |
|||
[[fr:Argumentum ad crumenam]] |
|||
[[he:אד קרומנם]] |
|||
[[lt:Argumentas iš turtingumo]] |
|||
[[pt:Argumentum ad crumenam]] |
|||
[[fi:Varallisuuteen vetoaminen]] |
|||
[[sv:Argumentum ad crumenam]] |
|||
[[uk:Argumentum ad crumenam]] |
|||
[[zh:訴諸富貴]] |
Latest revision as of 06:04, 23 June 2024
This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2024) |
An argumentum ad crumenam argument, also known as an argument to the purse, is the informal fallacy of drawing conclusions based on the speaker's financial status.[1] The term generally refers to the assumption that having wealth is indicative of insight or virtue, and that poverty denotes the opposite.[1]
The opposite is the argumentum ad lazarum.
Examples:
- "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"
- "This new law is a good idea. Most of the people against it are riff-raff who make less than $20,000 a year."
- "Warren Buffett is hosting a seminar. This seminar is better than others, because Warren Buffett is richer than most people."
References
[edit]- ^ a b Fellmeth, Aaron X.; Horwitz, Maurice (2021). "Argumentum ad crumenam". Guide to Latin in International Law. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780197583104.001.0001/acref-9780197583104-e-257. ISBN 9780197583104.