Cost overrun: Difference between revisions
Pbsouthwood (talk | contribs) |
→Prevention and mitigation: Altered tite. Added website. |
||
(31 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Unexpected incurred costs in excess of budgeted amounts}} |
|||
{{redirect|Underestimated|the Jennifer Paige song|Underestimated (song)}} |
{{redirect|Underestimated|the Jennifer Paige song|Underestimated (song)}} |
||
A '''cost overrun''', also known as a '''cost increase''' or '''budget overrun''', involves unexpected incurred [[cost]]s. When these costs are in excess of budgeted amounts due to |
{{short description|Unexpected incurred costs in excess of budgeted amounts}} |
||
A '''cost overrun''', also known as a '''cost increase''' or '''budget overrun''', involves unexpected incurred [[cost]]s. When these costs are in excess of budgeted amounts due to a [[value engineering]] underestimation of the actual cost during budgeting, they are known by these terms. |
|||
Cost overruns are common in [[infrastructure]], [[building]], and [[technology]] projects. For [[IT projects]], a 2004 industry study by the [[Standish Group]] found an average cost overrun of 43 percent; 71 percent of projects came in over budget, exceeded time estimates, and had estimated too narrow a [[Scope (project management)|scope]]; and total waste was estimated at $55 billion per year in the US alone.<ref name="chaos"> |
Cost overruns are common in [[infrastructure]], [[building]], and [[technology]] projects. For [[IT projects]], a 2004 industry study by the [[Standish Group]] found an average cost overrun of 43 percent; 71 percent of projects came in over budget, exceeded time estimates, and had estimated too narrow a [[Scope (project management)|scope]]; and total waste was estimated at $55 billion per year in the US alone.<ref name="chaos"> |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| title = Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? |
| title = Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? |
||
| date = 2002 |
| date = 2002 |
||
| journal = Journal of the American Planning Association| volume= 68|number= 3| |
| journal = Journal of the American Planning Association| volume= 68|number= 3|arxiv=1303.6604|ssrn=2278415|last1=Flyvbjerg|first1=Bent|last2=Holm|first2=Mette K. Skamris|last3=Buhl|first3=Søren L. |
||
| pages = 279–295 |
|||
|arxiv=1303.6604|ssrn=2278415|last1=Flyvbjerg|first1=Bent|last2=Holm|first2=Mette K. Skamris|last3=Buhl|first3=Søren L. |
|||
|bibcode=2013arXiv1303.6604F |
|bibcode=2013arXiv1303.6604F | doi=10.1080/01944360208976273| s2cid = 5807225 |
||
}} |
|||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
==Causes== |
==Causes== |
||
Recent works by Ahiaga-Dagbui and Smith suggests an alternative to what is traditionally seen as an overrun in the construction field.<ref name=datamining>{{cite journal|doi=10.1080/01446193.2014.933854|title=Dealing with construction cost overruns using data mining|journal=Construction Management and Economics|volume=32|issue=7–8|pages=682|year=2014|last1=Ahiaga-Dagbui|first1=Dominic D.|last2=Smith|first2=Simon D.|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ |
Recent works by Ahiaga-Dagbui and Smith suggests an alternative to what is traditionally seen as an overrun in the construction field.<ref name=datamining>{{cite journal|doi=10.1080/01446193.2014.933854|title=Dealing with construction cost overruns using data mining|journal=Construction Management and Economics|volume=32|issue=7–8|pages=682|year=2014|last1=Ahiaga-Dagbui|first1=Dominic D.|last2=Smith|first2=Simon D.|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262932913|hdl=10059/1307|s2cid=58922802|hdl-access=free}}</ref> They attempt to make a distinction between the often '''conflated causes of construction cost underestimation''' and '''eventual cost overruns'''. Critical to their argument is the point of reference for measuring cost overruns. Whereas some measure the size of cost overruns as the difference between cost at the time of decision to build and final completion costs, others measure the size of overruns as the difference between cost at contract award and final completion cost. This leads to a wide range in the size of overruns reported in different studies. |
||
Four types of [[explanation]] for cost overrun exist: [[Technology|technical]], [[psychological]], [[political]]-[[economic]], [[value engineering]]. Technical explanations account for cost overrun in terms of imperfect [[forecasting]] techniques, inadequate data, etc. Psychological explanations account for overrun in terms of [[optimism bias]] with forecasters. [[Scope creep]], where the requirements or targets rises during the project, is common. Finally, political-economic explanations see overrun as the result of [[strategic misrepresentation]] of scope or budgets. Historically, political explanations for cost overrun have been seen to be the most dominant.<ref name=embeddedness>{{cite journal|last1=Cantarelli|first1=Chantal C.|last2=Flybjerg|first2=Bent|last3=Molin|first3=Eric J. E.|last4=van Wee|first4=Bert|title=Cost Overruns in Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness|journal=European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research|date=2010|volume=10|issue=1|pages=5–18|arxiv=1307.2176|ssrn=2237990|bibcode=2013arXiv1307.2176C}}</ref> |
|||
In the USA, the architectural firm Home Architects has attributed this to a human trait they call "Psychology of Construction Cost Denial", regarding the cost inflation of custom homes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.homearchitects.com/psychology-of-construction-cost-denial|title=Psychology of Construction Cost Denial - Mountain Home Architects, Timber Frame Architect, Custom Homes |
In the USA, the architectural firm Home Architects has attributed this to a human trait they call "Psychology of Construction Cost Denial", regarding the cost inflation of custom homes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.homearchitects.com/psychology-of-construction-cost-denial|title=Psychology of Construction Cost Denial - Mountain Home Architects, Timber Frame Architect, Custom Homes}}</ref> |
||
A less explored possible cause of cost overruns on construction project is the [[escalation of commitment]] to a course of action. This theory, grounded in social psychology and organisation behaviour, suggests the tendency of people and organisations to become locked-in and entrapped in a particular course of action and thereby 'throw good money after bad' to make the venture succeed. This defies conventional rationality behind subjective expected utility theory. Ahiaga-Dagbui and Smith explore the effects of [[escalation of commitment]] on project delivery in construction using the case of the [[Scottish Parliament]] project.<ref name=scottish>{{cite journal|first1=Dominic|last1=Ahiaga-Dagbui|last2=Smith|first2=Simon|title=Exploring escalation of commitment in construction project management: Case study of the Scottish parliament project|journal=Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference|date=2014|pages=753–762 |
A less explored possible cause of cost overruns on construction project is the [[escalation of commitment]] to a course of action. This theory, grounded in social psychology and organisation behaviour, suggests the tendency of people and organisations to become locked-in and entrapped in a particular course of action and thereby 'throw good money after bad' to make the venture succeed. This defies conventional rationality behind subjective expected utility theory. Ahiaga-Dagbui and Smith explore the effects of [[escalation of commitment]] on project delivery in construction using the case of the [[Scottish Parliament]] project.<ref name=scottish>{{cite journal|first1=Dominic|last1=Ahiaga-Dagbui|last2=Smith|first2=Simon|title=Exploring escalation of commitment in construction project management: Case study of the Scottish parliament project|journal=Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference|date=2014|pages=753–762|publisher=Association of Researchers in Construction Management|hdl=10059/1303|language=en|isbn=9780955239083}}</ref> Also, a recent study has suggested that principles of chaos theory can be employed to understand how cost overruns emerge in [[megaprojects]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Olaniran |first1=O.J. |last2=Love |first2=P.E.D.|last3=Edwards |first3=D.J. |last4=Olatunji |first4=O.|title=Chaos Theory: Implications for Cost Overrun Research in Hydrocarbon Megaprojects |url=https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/4031/1/Chaos%20Theory%20Implications%20for%20Cost%20Overrun%20Research%20for%20Hydrocarbon%20Megaprojects%20.pdf |journal=Journal of Construction Engineering and Management |year=2017 |volume=143 |issue=2 |doi=10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001227 |access-date=29 August 2020}}</ref> This paper seeks to reclassify megaprojects as chaotic systems that are nonlinear and therefore difficult to predict. Using cases of cost overruns in oil and gas megaprojects, this study makes strong argument that chaos theory can indeed be a silver bullet in finding solutions to the recurring problem of cost overruns in megaprojects. |
||
A newly discovered possible cause of cost overruns is [[value engineering]], and an approach to correct value engineering cost overruns known as value-driven-design. |
|||
==Prevention and mitigation== |
==Prevention and mitigation== |
||
⚫ | In response to problem of cost overruns on major projects, the UK Government set up a Major Projects Authority to provide [[project assurance]] to HM Treasury and other Government departments undertaking major projects.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/major-projects-authority|title=Major Projects Authority|website=GOV.UK}}</ref> Independent review of the financial effectiveness of project assurance in reducing cost overruns found the project assurance process to be effective in reducing cost overruns and recommended an expansion of the process to cover most of the Government's project portfolio.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nao.org.uk/report/assurance-for-major-projects/|title=Assurance for major projects|website=National Audit Office (NAO)|date=2 May 2012 }}</ref> Project assurance is now also being used by private sector companies undertaking major projects. |
||
In IT projects (essentially meaning [[software development]] projects in this context), the traditional approach to try to control costs is the use of [[project management]] techniques, such as [[PRINCE2]] - though the use of such techniques has ''not'' prevented cost overruns in all cases. In the 21st century, a newer family of approaches, collectively termed [[agile software development]], have grown in popularity for IT projects - although conventional project management is still very widely used, and in some cases has merely been inaccurately "rebranded" as agile. |
|||
Agile development does ''not'' claim to guarantee perfect on-time and on-budget delivery of the original expectations (which may not be even realistic or suitable to meet user needs). It claims to be able to: |
|||
* converge faster on a suitable solution |
|||
* meet user needs faster (users may even be able to use a partially implemented system and therefore obtain economic benefit from it during the project's implementation, depending on the nature of the project) |
|||
* catch [[software bug|bugs]] faster, maybe even when they only exist in the primordial form of [[requirement]]s deficiencies, and hence be able to fix them more cheaply on average (because studies have shown bugs are more expensive to fix the later they are found)<ref name=":0">{{cite report|last1=Stecklein|first1=Jonette M.|last2=Dabney|first2=Jim|last3=Dick|first3=Brandon|last4=Haskins|first4=Bill|last5=Lovell|first5=Randy|last6=Moroney|first6=Gregory|title=Error Cost Escalation Through the Project Life Cycle|date=2004|url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100036670|id=JSC-CN-8435}}</ref> |
|||
* trim away unnecessary or even unwanted "nice to haves" from the list of features planned to be implemented, in order to cut costs (in this setting, the traditional software engineering term "requirements" is clearly seen to be something of a misnomer, as many so-called requirements aren't actually requirements at all) |
|||
* avoid the worst-case scenario: [[project cancellation]], in which all the money is wasted (except possibly that portion of the money spent on [[code reuse|reusable code]] and/or reusable [[Component-based software engineering|software components]], if they are considered to be worth reusing) |
|||
It has been claimed that agile development did not prevent cost and time overruns in the [[United Kingdom|UK]] government's [[Universal Credit]] IT project, but there are serious doubts as to whether the Universal Credit software development project was in fact following a proper agile process in the first place. |
|||
⚫ | In response to problem of cost overruns on major projects, the UK Government set up a Major Projects Authority to provide [[project assurance]] to HM Treasury and other Government departments undertaking major projects.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/major-projects-authority|title=Major Projects Authority |
||
==Describing== |
==Describing== |
||
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2023}} |
|||
Cost overrun can be described in multiple ways. |
Cost overrun can be described in multiple ways. |
||
Line 58: | Line 52: | ||
== List of projects with large cost overruns == |
== List of projects with large cost overruns == |
||
{{ |
{{Cleanup list|section|date=August 2022}} |
||
{{see also|List of failed and overbudget custom software projects}} |
{{see also|List of failed and overbudget custom software projects}} |
||
===Australia=== |
===Australia=== |
||
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2023}} |
|||
* [[Sydney Opera House]] was completed ten years late and more than fourteen times over budget. |
* [[Sydney Opera House]] was completed ten years late and more than fourteen times over budget. |
||
===Canada=== |
===Canada=== |
||
*[[Canadian Firearms Registry]], initially projected to cost Canadian taxpayers $CAN 2 million, ended up being |
*[[Canadian Firearms Registry]], initially projected to cost Canadian taxpayers $CAN 2 million, ended up being 1,000 times over budget at $CAN 2 billion |
||
*[[Trans Mountain pipeline]] expansion comes in 70 per cent higher than expected. Trans Mountain Corporation announced the projected cost of the pipeline expansion has soared from its earlier estimate of $12.6 billion to $21.4 billion.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nationalobserver.com/2022/02/18/news/trans-mountain-ceo-quits-pipeline-expansion-costs-nearly-double|title = Feds say no more funding for Trans Mountain expansion as project costs nearly double|date = 18 February 2022}}</ref> |
|||
===United Kingdom=== |
===United Kingdom=== |
||
*[[National Programme for IT]], |
*The [[NHS]] patient records system, implemented as part of the [[National Programme for IT]], was originally estimated to cost £6.4bn and eventually abandoned before completion after £10bn were spent. It was described as "one of the worst and most expensive contracting fiascos in the history of the public sector".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Syal |first1=Rajeev |title=Abandoned NHS IT system has cost £10bn so far |url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/sep/18/nhs-records-system-10bn |agency=The Guardian |date=18 September 2013}}</ref> |
||
*[[Scottish Parliament Building]],<ref name=scottish/> originally "expected to take two years and cost £40 million" but "took five years and cost £400 million".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Harari |first1=Yuval Noah |title=Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow |date=2017 |publisher=Harper |location=New York |page=305}}</ref> |
*[[Scottish Parliament Building]],<ref name=scottish/> originally "expected to take two years and cost £40 million" but "took five years and cost £400 million".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Harari |first1=Yuval Noah |title=Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow |date=2017 |publisher=Harper |location=New York |page=305}}</ref> |
||
*[[Edinburgh Trams]] |
*[[Edinburgh Trams]] |
||
=== |
===United States=== |
||
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2023}} |
|||
* The [[Big Dig]], a multi-billion dollar highway reconstruction in Boston, was delivered nine years late with a cost overrun of 190% adjusted for inflation. |
* The [[Big Dig]], a multi-billion dollar highway reconstruction in Boston, was delivered nine years late with a cost overrun of 190% adjusted for inflation. |
||
* The [[Boeing Dreamliner]] programme, announced in 2003, was supposed to cost $6 billion and see the plane take to the air in 2008. The final bill was closer to $32 billion; and the plane arrived three years late. |
* The [[Boeing Dreamliner]] programme, announced in 2003, was supposed to cost $6 billion and see the plane take to the air in 2008. The final bill was closer to $32 billion; and the plane arrived three years late. |
||
===Germany=== |
===Germany=== |
||
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2023}} |
|||
*[[Berlin Brandenburg Airport]]: 1 billion euro → 6 billion euro |
*[[Berlin Brandenburg Airport]]: 1 billion euro → 6 billion euro |
||
*[[Elbe Philharmonic Hall]] in Hamburg: 77 million euro → 789 million euro |
*[[Elbe Philharmonic Hall]] in Hamburg: 77 million euro → 789 million euro |
||
* |
*[[Landesarchiv Nordrhein-Westfalen]] in Duisburg: 30 million euro → 195 million euro |
||
*[[Staatsoper Unter den Linden]]: 240 million euro → 400 million euro |
*[[Staatsoper Unter den Linden]]: 240 million euro → 400 million euro |
||
===Finland=== |
===Finland=== |
||
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2023}} |
|||
*[[Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant#Unit 3|Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3]]: 3 billion euro → 8.5 billion euro (as of 2017, project still ongoing) |
*[[Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant#Unit 3|Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3]]: 3 billion euro → 8.5 billion euro (as of 2017, project still ongoing) |
||
*Helsinki [[Länsimetro|Western Metro Extension]]: 400 million euro → 1.19 billion euro (September 2017) |
*Helsinki [[Länsimetro|Western Metro Extension]]: 400 million euro → 1.19 billion euro (September 2017) |
||
===Russia=== |
===Russia=== |
||
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2023}} |
|||
*[[2014 Winter Olympics]] in [[Sochi]]: US$12 billion → US$51 billion |
*[[2014 Winter Olympics]] in [[Sochi]]: US$12 billion → US$51 billion |
||
*[[Krestovsky Stadium]] in [[St Petersburg]] = 548% |
*[[Krestovsky Stadium]] in [[St Petersburg]] = 548% |
Latest revision as of 12:18, 18 July 2024
A cost overrun, also known as a cost increase or budget overrun, involves unexpected incurred costs. When these costs are in excess of budgeted amounts due to a value engineering underestimation of the actual cost during budgeting, they are known by these terms.
Cost overruns are common in infrastructure, building, and technology projects. For IT projects, a 2004 industry study by the Standish Group found an average cost overrun of 43 percent; 71 percent of projects came in over budget, exceeded time estimates, and had estimated too narrow a scope; and total waste was estimated at $55 billion per year in the US alone.[1]
Many major construction projects have incurred cost overruns; cost estimates used to decide whether important transportation infrastructure should be built can mislead grossly and systematically.[2]
Cost overrun is distinguished from cost escalation, which is an anticipated growth in a budgeted cost due to factors such as inflation.
Causes
[edit]Recent works by Ahiaga-Dagbui and Smith suggests an alternative to what is traditionally seen as an overrun in the construction field.[3] They attempt to make a distinction between the often conflated causes of construction cost underestimation and eventual cost overruns. Critical to their argument is the point of reference for measuring cost overruns. Whereas some measure the size of cost overruns as the difference between cost at the time of decision to build and final completion costs, others measure the size of overruns as the difference between cost at contract award and final completion cost. This leads to a wide range in the size of overruns reported in different studies.
Four types of explanation for cost overrun exist: technical, psychological, political-economic, value engineering. Technical explanations account for cost overrun in terms of imperfect forecasting techniques, inadequate data, etc. Psychological explanations account for overrun in terms of optimism bias with forecasters. Scope creep, where the requirements or targets rises during the project, is common. Finally, political-economic explanations see overrun as the result of strategic misrepresentation of scope or budgets. Historically, political explanations for cost overrun have been seen to be the most dominant.[4] In the USA, the architectural firm Home Architects has attributed this to a human trait they call "Psychology of Construction Cost Denial", regarding the cost inflation of custom homes.[5]
A less explored possible cause of cost overruns on construction project is the escalation of commitment to a course of action. This theory, grounded in social psychology and organisation behaviour, suggests the tendency of people and organisations to become locked-in and entrapped in a particular course of action and thereby 'throw good money after bad' to make the venture succeed. This defies conventional rationality behind subjective expected utility theory. Ahiaga-Dagbui and Smith explore the effects of escalation of commitment on project delivery in construction using the case of the Scottish Parliament project.[6] Also, a recent study has suggested that principles of chaos theory can be employed to understand how cost overruns emerge in megaprojects.[7] This paper seeks to reclassify megaprojects as chaotic systems that are nonlinear and therefore difficult to predict. Using cases of cost overruns in oil and gas megaprojects, this study makes strong argument that chaos theory can indeed be a silver bullet in finding solutions to the recurring problem of cost overruns in megaprojects.
A newly discovered possible cause of cost overruns is value engineering, and an approach to correct value engineering cost overruns known as value-driven-design.
Prevention and mitigation
[edit]In response to problem of cost overruns on major projects, the UK Government set up a Major Projects Authority to provide project assurance to HM Treasury and other Government departments undertaking major projects.[8] Independent review of the financial effectiveness of project assurance in reducing cost overruns found the project assurance process to be effective in reducing cost overruns and recommended an expansion of the process to cover most of the Government's project portfolio.[9] Project assurance is now also being used by private sector companies undertaking major projects.
Describing
[edit]Cost overrun can be described in multiple ways.
- As a percentage of the total expenditure
- As a total percentage including and above the original budget
- As a percentage of the cost overruns to original budget
For example, consider a bridge with a construction budget of $100 million where the actual cost was $150 million. This scenario could be truthfully represented by the following statement
- The cost overruns constituted 33% of the total expense.
- The budget for the bridge increased to 150%.
- The cost overruns exceeded the original budget by 50%.
The final example is the most commonly used as it specifically describes the cost overruns exclusively whereas the other two describe the overrun as an aspect of the total expense. In any case care should be taken to accurately describe what is meant by the chosen percentage so as to avoid ambiguity.
List of projects with large cost overruns
[edit]Australia
[edit]- Sydney Opera House was completed ten years late and more than fourteen times over budget.
Canada
[edit]- Canadian Firearms Registry, initially projected to cost Canadian taxpayers $CAN 2 million, ended up being 1,000 times over budget at $CAN 2 billion
- Trans Mountain pipeline expansion comes in 70 per cent higher than expected. Trans Mountain Corporation announced the projected cost of the pipeline expansion has soared from its earlier estimate of $12.6 billion to $21.4 billion.[10]
United Kingdom
[edit]- The NHS patient records system, implemented as part of the National Programme for IT, was originally estimated to cost £6.4bn and eventually abandoned before completion after £10bn were spent. It was described as "one of the worst and most expensive contracting fiascos in the history of the public sector".[11]
- Scottish Parliament Building,[6] originally "expected to take two years and cost £40 million" but "took five years and cost £400 million".[12]
- Edinburgh Trams
United States
[edit]- The Big Dig, a multi-billion dollar highway reconstruction in Boston, was delivered nine years late with a cost overrun of 190% adjusted for inflation.
- The Boeing Dreamliner programme, announced in 2003, was supposed to cost $6 billion and see the plane take to the air in 2008. The final bill was closer to $32 billion; and the plane arrived three years late.
Germany
[edit]- Berlin Brandenburg Airport: 1 billion euro → 6 billion euro
- Elbe Philharmonic Hall in Hamburg: 77 million euro → 789 million euro
- Landesarchiv Nordrhein-Westfalen in Duisburg: 30 million euro → 195 million euro
- Staatsoper Unter den Linden: 240 million euro → 400 million euro
Finland
[edit]- Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3: 3 billion euro → 8.5 billion euro (as of 2017, project still ongoing)
- Helsinki Western Metro Extension: 400 million euro → 1.19 billion euro (September 2017)
Russia
[edit]- 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi: US$12 billion → US$51 billion
- Krestovsky Stadium in St Petersburg = 548%
See also
[edit]- Admissible heuristic – Computer science pathfinding concept
- Benefit shortfall – When the actual benefits of a venture are less than the projected or estimated benefits
- Downside risk – Risk of the actual return being below the expected return
- Efficient contract theory – Hypothesis that if a contract continues to exist it must be efficient due to survivorship bias
- Escalation of commitment – A human behavior pattern in which the participant takes on increasingly greater risk
- Hiding hand principle – How ignorance intersects with rational choice to undertake a project
- Megaproject – Extremely large-scale construction and investment project
- Optimism bias – Type of cognitive bias
- Planning fallacy – Cognitive bias of underestimating time needed
- Reference class forecasting – Method of predicting the future
- Scope creep – Continuous or uncontrolled growth in a project's scope, at any point after the project begins
References
[edit]- ^ Standish Group (2004). CHAOS Report (Report). West Yarmouth, Massachusetts: Standish Group.
- ^ Flyvbjerg, Bent; Holm, Mette K. Skamris; Buhl, Søren L. (2002). "Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie?". Journal of the American Planning Association. 68 (3): 279–295. arXiv:1303.6604. Bibcode:2013arXiv1303.6604F. doi:10.1080/01944360208976273. S2CID 5807225. SSRN 2278415.
- ^ Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic D.; Smith, Simon D. (2014). "Dealing with construction cost overruns using data mining". Construction Management and Economics. 32 (7–8): 682. doi:10.1080/01446193.2014.933854. hdl:10059/1307. S2CID 58922802.
- ^ Cantarelli, Chantal C.; Flybjerg, Bent; Molin, Eric J. E.; van Wee, Bert (2010). "Cost Overruns in Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness". European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 10 (1): 5–18. arXiv:1307.2176. Bibcode:2013arXiv1307.2176C. SSRN 2237990.
- ^ "Psychology of Construction Cost Denial - Mountain Home Architects, Timber Frame Architect, Custom Homes".
- ^ a b Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic; Smith, Simon (2014). "Exploring escalation of commitment in construction project management: Case study of the Scottish parliament project". Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference. Association of Researchers in Construction Management: 753–762. hdl:10059/1303. ISBN 9780955239083.
- ^ Olaniran, O.J.; Love, P.E.D.; Edwards, D.J.; Olatunji, O. (2017). "Chaos Theory: Implications for Cost Overrun Research in Hydrocarbon Megaprojects" (PDF). Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 143 (2). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001227. Retrieved 29 August 2020.
- ^ "Major Projects Authority". GOV.UK.
- ^ "Assurance for major projects". National Audit Office (NAO). 2 May 2012.
- ^ "Feds say no more funding for Trans Mountain expansion as project costs nearly double". 18 February 2022.
- ^ Syal, Rajeev (18 September 2013). "Abandoned NHS IT system has cost £10bn so far". The Guardian.
- ^ Harari, Yuval Noah (2017). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York: Harper. p. 305.
External links
[edit]- The RISKS digest (focuses on failed and overran IT projects)