Jump to content

Freemasonry: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
It appears that the consensus is for this information to remain. Revert
consensus by non-masonic editors is that the material is poorly referenced, propaganistic, and completely unencyclopedic
Line 206: Line 206:
During the career of [[Archbishop]] [[Geoffrey Fisher]] many [[Church of England]] Bishops were Freemasons[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Fisher#Masonic_role]. Fisher himself rose to very senior masonic rank.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Fisher#Masonic_role] At this time perhaps only a small proportion of members of the Church of England would have seen any incongruity in adherence to Anglican Christianity and the practice of Freemasonry. In recent decades hostility to Freemasonry has probably increased within Anglicanism, perhaps due to the increasing prominence of the evangelical wing of the church. The current [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], [[Rowan Williams|Dr Rowan Williams]], appears to harbour deep reservations about Masonic ritual, whilst being anxious to avoid causing offence to Freemasons inside and outside the Church of England.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/20/nmason20.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/20/ixhome.html] In 2003 he felt it necessary to apologise to British Freemasons after he said that their beliefs were incompatible with Christianity and that he had barred the appointment of Freemasons to senior posts in his diocese when he was Bishop of Monmouth.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/20/nmason20.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/20/ixhome.html]
During the career of [[Archbishop]] [[Geoffrey Fisher]] many [[Church of England]] Bishops were Freemasons[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Fisher#Masonic_role]. Fisher himself rose to very senior masonic rank.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Fisher#Masonic_role] At this time perhaps only a small proportion of members of the Church of England would have seen any incongruity in adherence to Anglican Christianity and the practice of Freemasonry. In recent decades hostility to Freemasonry has probably increased within Anglicanism, perhaps due to the increasing prominence of the evangelical wing of the church. The current [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], [[Rowan Williams|Dr Rowan Williams]], appears to harbour deep reservations about Masonic ritual, whilst being anxious to avoid causing offence to Freemasons inside and outside the Church of England.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/20/nmason20.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/20/ixhome.html] In 2003 he felt it necessary to apologise to British Freemasons after he said that their beliefs were incompatible with Christianity and that he had barred the appointment of Freemasons to senior posts in his diocese when he was Bishop of Monmouth.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/20/nmason20.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/20/ixhome.html]


==== Muslim anti-Masonry ====
{{Further|[[Holocaust denial#In the Muslim world|Holocaust denial in the Muslim world]], [[Anti-Masonry#Iraqi Baathist Anti-Masonry|Iraqi Baathist Anti-Masonry]] and [[Hamas#The Covenant of Hamas|The Covenant of Hamas]]}}


Freemasonry welcomes Muslims as members.<ref name="FMreligion"/><ref name="YQAreligion"/> [[Islamic]] anti-Masonry is closely linked with Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism though other criticisms are made.<ref>[http://www.islamonline.com/cgi-bin/news_service/fatwah_story.asp?service_id=365 Islam Online]</ref> In 1980, the Iraqi legal and penal code was changed by [[Saddam Hussein|Saddam Hussein's]] ruling [[Ba'ath Party]], making it a felony to "promote or acclaim Zionist principles, including freemasonry, or who associate [themselves] with Zionist organizations."<ref name="freemasonryinSHIraq">[http://washingtontimes.com/world/20040701-120129-6565r.htm "Saddam to be formally charged"] The Washington Times, 2004, Accessed [[18 June]], [[2006]]</ref>


=== Political opposition ===
=== Political opposition ===
{{See also|Anti-Masonry|Freemasonry under totalitarian regimes}}

Freemasonry has long been a target associated with the [[New World Order]] and other "agents", such as the [[Illuminati]], seen by conspiracy theorists as either bent on world domination or already secretly in control of world politics. Historically it has attracted criticism - and suppression - from both the politically [[Far right|extreme right]] (e.g. [[Nazi Germany]])<ref>James Wilkenson and H. Stuart Hughes, ''Contemporary Europe: A History'', Prentice Hall:1995 p.237</ref><ref>Otto Zierer, ''Concise History of Great Nations: History of Germany'', Leon Amiel Publisher:1976 p. 104 </ref> and the [[Far left|extreme left]] (e.g. the former [[Communist]] states in [[Eastern Europe]]). The Fraternity has encountered both applause for “founding”, and opposition for supposedly thwarting, [[liberal democracy]] (such as the United States of America).

In some countries anti-Masonry is often related to [[anti-Semitism]] and [[anti-Zionism]]. Professor [http://www.shef.ac.uk/history/staff/research_fellows/andrew_prescott.html Andrew Prescott], of the University of Sheffield, writes: "Since at least the time of the [[The Protocols of the Elders of Zion|Protocols of the Elders of Zion]], anti-semitism has gone hand in hand with anti-masonry, so it is not surprising that allegations that [[11 September]] was a Zionist plot have been accompanied by suggestions that the attacks were inspired by a masonic world order."<ref name="SFMNAD">[http://freemasonry.dept.shef.ac.uk/pdf/ovn.pdf?PHPSESSID=bf5645aae288a112e6c99cacdca85a90 The Study of Freemasonry as a New Academic Discipline] (page 13-14, 30, 33) by Andrew Prescott; accessed [[21 May]], [[2006]]</ref>


In 1799 English Freemasonry almost came to a halt due to Parliamentary proclamation. In the wake of the [[French Revolution]], the ''Unlawful Societies Act, 1799'' banned any meetings of groups that required their members to take an [[oath]] or obligation.<ref name="UGLE history"> [http://www.grandlodge-england.org/ugle/the-history-of-grand-lodge-1.htm''UGLE History''] Accessed [[March 8]] [[2006]].</ref> The Grand Masters of both the Moderns and the Antients Grand Lodges called on the Prime Minister William Pitt, (who was not a Freemason) and explained to him that Freemasonry was a supporter of the law and lawfully constituted authority and was much involved in charitable work. As a result Freemasonry was specifically exempted from the terms of the Act, provided that each Private Lodge's Secretary placed with the local "Clerk of the Peace" a list of the members of his Lodge once a year.<ref name="UGLE history"/> This continued until 1967 when the obligation of the provision was rescinded by [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Parliament]].<ref name="UGLE history"/> ''Regular'' Freemasonry inserted into its core ritual a formal obligation: to be quiet and peaceable citizens, true to the lawful government of the country in which they live, and not to countenance disloyalty or rebellion.<ref name="UGLE home"/> A Freemason makes a further obligation, before being made Master of his Lodge, to pay a proper respect to the civil [[magistrate]]s.<ref name="UGLE home"/> The words may be varied across Grand Lodges, but the sense in the obligation taken is always there in ''regular'' Freemasonry.
In 1799 English Freemasonry almost came to a halt due to Parliamentary proclamation. In the wake of the [[French Revolution]], the ''Unlawful Societies Act, 1799'' banned any meetings of groups that required their members to take an [[oath]] or obligation.<ref name="UGLE history"> [http://www.grandlodge-england.org/ugle/the-history-of-grand-lodge-1.htm''UGLE History''] Accessed [[March 8]] [[2006]].</ref> The Grand Masters of both the Moderns and the Antients Grand Lodges called on the Prime Minister William Pitt, (who was not a Freemason) and explained to him that Freemasonry was a supporter of the law and lawfully constituted authority and was much involved in charitable work. As a result Freemasonry was specifically exempted from the terms of the Act, provided that each Private Lodge's Secretary placed with the local "Clerk of the Peace" a list of the members of his Lodge once a year.<ref name="UGLE history"/> This continued until 1967 when the obligation of the provision was rescinded by [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Parliament]].<ref name="UGLE history"/> ''Regular'' Freemasonry inserted into its core ritual a formal obligation: to be quiet and peaceable citizens, true to the lawful government of the country in which they live, and not to countenance disloyalty or rebellion.<ref name="UGLE home"/> A Freemason makes a further obligation, before being made Master of his Lodge, to pay a proper respect to the civil [[magistrate]]s.<ref name="UGLE home"/> The words may be varied across Grand Lodges, but the sense in the obligation taken is always there in ''regular'' Freemasonry.
Line 227: Line 219:


The [[United Kingdom|UK]] [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] government, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, attempted to require all members of fraternal organisations who are public officials to make their affiliation public.<ref> [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldhansrd/vo020513/text/20513w03.htm Lord Sainsbury of Turville’s reply, Lords Hansard, [[13 May]] [[2002]]: Column WA9 (UK House of Lords Daily Debates)] Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref><ref>[http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/report.html UK House of Commons Home Affairs Committee], 3rd Report on FM in the Police & Judiciary, printed [[19 March]] [[1997]]. Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref> This was challenged under [[European]] [[human rights]] legislation, and the government in enacting the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law,<ref> [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980042.htm ''UK Act, 1998''] Accessed [[March 5]] [[2006]].</ref> had to curtail the scope of their requirements.<ref> [http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/statement.html''UGLE Statement''] Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref> Arrangements for the declaration of Freemasonry membership have been established for the current Lay Magistracy, Judiciary, and voluntary registration was introduced in 1999 for the Police Service.<ref> [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030224/text/30224w85.htm#30224w85.html_wqn6 Mr. Denham's reply], Hansard, [[24 February]] [[2003]] : Column 329W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) accessed [[12 May]] [[2006]].</ref> Decisions on whether information should be released are the responsibility of the public authority receiving the request, on a case-by-case basis, acting in accordance with the principles of the ''Freedom of Information Act, 2000''.<ref> [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm050721/text/50721w69.htm Hazel Blears’ reply], Hansard, [[21 July]] [[2005]] : Column 2191W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) accessed [[12 May]] [[2006]].</ref>
The [[United Kingdom|UK]] [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] government, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, attempted to require all members of fraternal organisations who are public officials to make their affiliation public.<ref> [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldhansrd/vo020513/text/20513w03.htm Lord Sainsbury of Turville’s reply, Lords Hansard, [[13 May]] [[2002]]: Column WA9 (UK House of Lords Daily Debates)] Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref><ref>[http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/report.html UK House of Commons Home Affairs Committee], 3rd Report on FM in the Police & Judiciary, printed [[19 March]] [[1997]]. Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref> This was challenged under [[European]] [[human rights]] legislation, and the government in enacting the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law,<ref> [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980042.htm ''UK Act, 1998''] Accessed [[March 5]] [[2006]].</ref> had to curtail the scope of their requirements.<ref> [http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/statement.html''UGLE Statement''] Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref> Arrangements for the declaration of Freemasonry membership have been established for the current Lay Magistracy, Judiciary, and voluntary registration was introduced in 1999 for the Police Service.<ref> [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030224/text/30224w85.htm#30224w85.html_wqn6 Mr. Denham's reply], Hansard, [[24 February]] [[2003]] : Column 329W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) accessed [[12 May]] [[2006]].</ref> Decisions on whether information should be released are the responsibility of the public authority receiving the request, on a case-by-case basis, acting in accordance with the principles of the ''Freedom of Information Act, 2000''.<ref> [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm050721/text/50721w69.htm Hazel Blears’ reply], Hansard, [[21 July]] [[2005]] : Column 2191W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) accessed [[12 May]] [[2006]].</ref>

=== The Holocaust ===
[[Image:Forgetmenotflower.JPG|thumb|right|120px|[[Forget-me-not]]]]
{{main|Holocaust}}
{{see also|Freemasonry under totalitarian regimes|Liberté chérie (Freemasonry)}}

The preserved records of the ''[[RSHA|Reichssicherheitshauptamt]]'' (Reich Security Main Office) show the persecution of the [[Freemasonry under Totalitarian Regimes#Nazi Germany and Occupied Europe|Freemasons]].<ref> [http://mill-valley.freemasonry.biz/persecution.htm Documented evidence from the US Holocaust Memorial Museum pertaining to the persecution of the Freemasons] accessed [[21 May]], [[2006]]</ref> RSHA Amt VII, ''Written Records'' - overseen by Professor [[Franz Six]] - was responsible for "ideological" tasks, by which was meant the creation of anti-semitic and anti-masonic propaganda. While the number is not accurately known, it is estimated that between 80,000 and 200,000 [[Freemasonry|Freemasons]] were [[Liberté chérie (Freemasonry)|exterminated]] under the [[Nacht und Nebel|Nazi regime]].<ref name="Dummies">''Freemasons for Dummies'', [http://members.aol.com/brlodge/whymasons.html Christopher Hodapp], ISBN 0-7645-9796-5, Hungry Minds Inc,U.S., 2005.</ref> Freemasonic Concentration Camp inmates were graded as [[Liberté chérie (Freemasonry)|“Political” prisoners]], and wore an inverted (point down) ''[[Nazi concentration camp badges|red triangle]]''.<ref>''The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust'', volume 2, page 531, citing Katz, ''Jews and Freemasons in Europe''.</ref>

The small blue [[forget-me-not]] flower was first used by the Grand Lodge ''Zur Sonne'', in 1926, as a Masonic emblem at the annual convention in [[Bremen (city)|Bremen]], Germany. In 1938 the forget-me-not badge – made by the same factory as the Masonic badge – was chosen for the annual Nazi Party ''Winterhilfswerk''; a supposed charitable organization, which actually collected money used for rearmament. This coincidence enabled Freemasons to wear forget-me-not badge as a secret sign of membership.<ref>{{De icon}} [http://www.internetloge.de/arst/forgetd.htm Das Vergißmeinnicht-Abzeichen und die Freimaurerei, Die wahre Geschichte] Accessed [[July 8]] [[2006]].</ref><ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/bernheim3.html "THE BLUE FORGET-ME-NOT" - ANOTHER SIDE OF THE STORY] Accessed [[July 8]] [[2006]].</ref><ref>Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737-1972 (Quatuor Coronati Bayreuth, Hamburg 1974). Second revised edition, Karl Heinz Francke and Dr. Ernst-Günther Geppert, Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737-1985 (Hamburg 1988).</ref>

After the [[World War II|Second World War]], the forget-me-not<ref>[http://www.galenlodge.co.uk/forgetmenot.htm ''Das Vergissmeinnicht The Forget-Me-Not''] Accessed February 6, 2006.</ref> flower was used again as a Masonic emblem at the 1948, first, Annual Convention in of the United Grand Lodges of Germany, Ancient Free & Accepted Masons. The badge is now worn in the coat lapel by Freemasons around the world to remember all those that have suffered in the name of Freemasonry, and specifically those during the [[Liberté chérie (Freemasonry)|Nazi era]].<ref>[http://www.galenlodge.co.uk/forgetmenot.htm''Flower Badge as told by Galen Lodge No 2394 (UGLE)''] Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref><ref> [http://www.mastermason.com/monlou522/forget~me~not.html ''Flower Badge''] Accessed [[March 4]] [[2006]].</ref>


== Cultural references ==
== Cultural references ==
Line 286: Line 267:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.religion-cults.com/Secret/Freemasonry/Freemasonry.htm Freemasonry, symbolisms of Masonry, art gallery ]
* [http://freemasonrywatch.org/ Freemasonry Watch - Is the Devil in the details?]
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09771a.htm CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Masonry (Freemasonry) ]
* [http://www.saintsalive.com/freemasonry.html Saints Alive - Freemasonry ]
* [http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Freemasonry.htm Freemasonry: Midwife to an Occult Empire ]
* [http://mit.edu/dryfoo/Masonry/ MIT.edu : Masonry] - An article on Freemasonry, by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
* [http://mit.edu/dryfoo/Masonry/ MIT.edu : Masonry] - An article on Freemasonry, by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
* [http://www.brad.ac.uk/webofhiram/ Brad.ac.uk : Web of Hiram]
* [http://www.brad.ac.uk/webofhiram/ Brad.ac.uk : Web of Hiram]

Revision as of 12:04, 15 January 2007

The Masonic Square and Compasses. Found with or without the ‘G’

Freemasonry is a fraternal organization whose membership is held together by shared moral and metaphysical ideals and—in most of its branches—by a constitutional declaration of belief in a Supreme Being.[1]

The fraternity uses the metaphor of operative stonemasons' tools and implements, against the allegorical backdrop of the building of the Temple of King Solomon, to convey what is most generally defined as: A peculiar (some say particular or beautiful) system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols.[2] An example of this is illustrated in the 1991 English Emulation Ritual.[3]

While it has often been called a "Secret Society", it is more correct to say that it is an esoteric society, in that certain aspects are private;[4] Freemasons have stated that Freemasonry has, in the 21st century, become less a secret society and more of a "society with secrets."[5][6][7] Most modern Freemasons regard the traditional concern over secrecy as a demonstration of their ability to keep a promise[8] and a concern over the privacy of their own affairs.[9] "Lodge meetings, like meetings of many other social and professional associations, are private occasions open only to members."[10][11] The private aspects of modern Freemasonry deal with the modes of recognition amongst members and elements within the ritual.[3][7]

While there have been many disclosures and exposés dating as far back as the eighteenth century, Freemasons caution that these often lack the proper context for true understanding, may be outdated for various reasons,[12] or could be outright hoaxes on the part of the author.[10] Freemasons are proud of their heritage and are happy to share it, offering spokesmen, briefings for the media, and providing talks to interested groups upon request.[10]

Organizational structure

Grand Lodges and Grand Orients are independent and sovereign bodies that rule over the fraternity in a given country, state, or geographical area. There is no single general governing body that presides over world-wide Freemasonry. Fraternal connections depend solely on mutual recognition. There are two major branches of Freemasonry: "Regular"[4] Grand Lodges that are recognized by the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) and "liberal" Grand Orients that are recognized by the Grand Orient de France. While in very general terms, one can tell which branch of Freemasonry a Masonic Lodge conforms to by determining whether it was chartered by a Grand Lodge or a Grand Orient, there are exceptions. A few Grand Orients are recognized by UGLE and a few Grand Lodges are recognized by Grand Orient de France. To confuse matters more, many Masonic practices are determined by custom at the individual Lodge level, and so any general description will not be, and cannot be, universally true.

Regularity

Freemasons Hall, London, home of the United Grand Lodge of England.

Regularity is a constitutional mechanism by which Grand Lodges or Grand Orients give one another mutual recognition. This recognition allows formal interaction at the Grand Lodge level, and gives individual Freemasons the opportunity to attend meetings at Lodges in other recognized jurisdictions. Conversely, regularity proscribes interaction with Lodges that are irregular.

Grand Lodges that afford mutual recognition and allow intervisitation are said to be in amity. Regularity as far as the UGLE Constitution is concerned, is based around a number of Landmarks, set down in their constitution and the constitutions of those Grand Lodges with which they are in amity. Even within this definition there are some variations with the quantity and content of the Landmarks from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Other Masonic groups organise differently.

However, even without formal recognition of regularity, some Grand Lodges continue informal relations.

The Masonic Lodge

A Lodge, often termed a Private Lodge or Constituent Lodge in Constitutions, is the basic organization of Freemasonry. Every new Lodge must be warranted by a Grand Lodge, but is subject to its direction only in enforcing the published Constitution of the jurisdiction. A Lodge must hold full meetings regularly at published dates and places. It will elect, initiate and promote its own members and officers; and it will own, occupy or share premises, and will normally build up a collection of minutes, records and equipment. Like any other club it will also have its formal business, annual general meetings (AGMs), accounts and charity funds, committees, reports, bank accounts and tax returns, etc.

A man can only be initiated, or made a Mason, in a Lodge, of which he may well remain a subscribing member for life. A Master Mason is generally entitled to visit any Lodge meeting under any jurisdiction in amity with his own; and a Lodge may well offer hospitality to such a visitor after the formal meeting. He is first usually required to check the regularity of that Lodge, and must be able to satisfy that Lodge of his own regularity; and he may be refused admission if adjudged likely to disrupt the harmony of the Lodge. If he wishes to visit the same Lodge repeatedly, he may be expected to join it, and pay a membership subscription.

Freemasons correctly meet as a Lodge, not in a Lodge, although Masonic premises may be called Lodges or Temples ("of Philosophy and the Arts"). In many countries Masonic Centre or Hall has now replaced these terms to avoid arousing prejudice and suspicion. Several different Lodges, as well as other Masonic organisations, often use the same premises at different times.

Early Lodges often met in a tavern or any other convenient fixed place with a private room. According to Masonic tradition, the Lodge of medieval stonemasons was on the southern side of the building site, with the sun warming the stones during the day. The social Festive Board or Social Board, part of the meeting is thus sometimes called the South.

Most Lodges consist of Freemasons living or working within a given town or neighbourhood. Other Lodges are composed of Masons with a particular shared interest, profession or background. Shared schools, universities, military units, Masonic appointments or degrees, arts, professions and hobbies have all been the qualifications for such Lodges. In some Lodges, the foundation and name may now be only of historic interest, as over time the membership evolves beyond that envisaged by its "founding brethren"; in others, the membership remains exclusive. Every Lodge may always exclude any candidate for membership, whether or not already a Mason.

There are also specialist Lodges of Research, with membership drawn from Master Masons only, with interests in Masonic Research (of history, philosophy, etc.). Lodges of Research are fully warranted but, generally, do not initiate new candidates. Lodges of Instruction in UGLE may be warranted by any ordinary Lodge, for the learning and rehearsal of Masonic Ritual.

Prince Hall Freemasonry

Prince Hall Freemasonry derives from historically unique events which led to a (now obsolete) tradition of separate, predominantly African American Freemasonry in North America.

In 1775, an African American named Prince Hall[13] was initiated into an Irish Constitution Military Lodge then in Boston, Massachusetts, along with fourteen other African-Americans, all of whom were free-born. When the Military Lodge left North America, the African-Americans were given the authority to meet as a Lodge, form Processions on the days of the Saints John, and conduct Masonic funerals, but not to confer degrees, nor to do other Masonic Work. In 1784 these individuals applied for, and obtained, a Lodge Warrant from the Premier Grand Lodge of England and formed African Lodge, Number 459 (Premier Grand Lodge of England). When the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) was formed in 1813, all U.S. based Lodges were stricken from their rolls – due largely to the U.S. and British War, 1812 to 1815. Thus, separated from both UGLE and any concordantly recognised U.S. Grand Lodge, African Lodge re-titled itself as the African Lodge, Number 1—and became a de facto "Grand Lodge". (This Lodge is not to be confused with the various Grand Lodges on the Continent of Africa). As with the rest of U.S. Freemasonry, Prince Hall Freemasonry soon grew, and organised on a Grand Lodge system for each state.

Widespread segregation, in the 19th and early 20th century North America, made it difficult for African Americans to join Lodges outside of Prince Hall jurisdictions—and impossible for inter-jurisdiction recognition between the parallel U.S. Masonic authorities.

Prince Hall Masonry has always been regular in all respects except constitutional separation, and this separation has diminished in recent years. At present, Prince Hall Grand Lodges are recognized by some UGLE Concordant Grand Lodges and not by others, but appear to be working toward full recognition, with UGLE granting at least some degree of recognition.[14] There are a growing number of both Prince Hall Lodges and non-Prince Hall Lodges that have ethnically diverse membership.

Other degrees, orders and bodies

There is no degree in Freemasonry higher than that of Master Mason.[15] There are, however, a number of organizations which require being a Master Mason as a prerequisite for membership.[16] These bodies have no authority over the Craft,[15]. These orders or degrees may be described as additional or appendant, and often provide a further perspective on some of the allegorical, moral and philosophical content of Freemasonry.

Appendant bodies are administered separately from Craft Grand Lodges but are styled Masonic since every member must be a Mason. However, Craft Masonic jurisdictions vary in their relationships with such bodies, if a relationship exists at all. The Articles of Union of the "Modern" and "Antient" craft Grand Lodges into UGLE limited recognition to certain degrees, such as the Royal Arch and the "chivalric degrees", but there were and are many other degrees which have been worked since before the Union. Some such bodies are not universally considered as appendant bodies, being simply separate organizations that happen to require prior Masonic affiliation for membership. Some of these organizations have additional requirements such as religious adherence (e.g. requiring members to profess Trinitarian Christian beliefs) or membership of other bodies.

Quite apart from these, there are organisations which are often thought of as related to Freemasonry, but which are in fact not related at all, and are not accorded recognition as Masonic, such as the Orange Order which originated in Ireland, or the International Order of Odd Fellows.

Principles and activities

Freemasonry is described as: A peculiar (some say particular or beautiful) system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols., for example, articulated in the 1991 English Emulation Ritual,[3][17] and as such the activities centre around this.

Ritual, symbolism, and morality

Freemasonic ritual makes use of the architectural symbolism of the medieval operative Masons, who actually worked in stone. Freemasons, as Speculative Masons, use this symbolism to teach moral and ethical lessons of the principles of "Brotherly Love, Relief and Truth" — or as related in France: "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity".[18]

Two of the principal symbols always found in a Lodge are the square and compasses; symbols always displayed in an open Lodge. Some Lodges and rituals explain these symbols as lesson in conduct: that one should "square their actions by the square of virtue" for example. However, as Freemasonry is non-dogmatic, there is no general interpretation for these symbols (or any Masonic symbol) that is used by Freemasonry as a whole.[19]

These moral lessons are communicated in performance of allegorical ritual. A candidate progresses through degrees[15] gaining knowledge and understanding of himself, his relationship with others and his relationship with the Supreme Being, (as he interprets this for himself). While the philosophical aspects of the Craft tend to be discussed in Lodges of Instruction or Research, and sometimes informal groups, Freemasons, and others, frequently publish — to a variable degree of competence — studies that are available to the public. It is well noted, however, that no one person "speaks" for the whole of Freemasonry.

The Volume of the Sacred Law is always displayed in an open Lodge. In English-speaking countries, this is frequently the King James Version of the Bible or another standard translation (there is no such thing as an exclusive "Masonic Bible").[20] In many French Lodges, the Masonic Constitutions are used. A candidate is given his choice of religious text for his Obligation, according to his beliefs. UGLE alludes to similarities to legal practice in the UK, and to a common source with other oath taking.[21][22][23][24] Christian candidates will typically use the Lodge's Bible while those of other religions may choose another book that is holy to them, to be displayed alongside the Lodges' usual VSL. In Lodges with a membership of mixed religions it is common to find more than one sacred text displayed representing the beliefs of the individuals present.

In keeping with the geometrical and architectural theme of Freemasonry, the Supreme Being is referred to in Masonic ritual by the titles of the Great Architect of the Universe, Grand Geometer or similar forms of words to make clear that their reference is generic, not about any one religion's particular concept of God.

Degrees

The three degrees of Craft or Blue Lodge Freemasonry are those of:

  1. Entered Apprentice (EA) - the degree of an Initiate, which makes one a Mason
  2. Fellow Craft (FC)
  3. Master Mason (MM)- the "third degree", a necessary qualification for participation in almost any aspect of Masonry.

The degrees represent stages of personal development. No Freemason is told that there is only one meaning to the allegories; as a Freemason works through the degrees and studies their lessons, he interprets them for himself, his personal interpretation being bounded only by the Constitution within which he works.[20] A common symbolic structure and universal archetypes provide a means for each Freemason to come to his own answers to life's important philosophical questions.

There is no degree of Craft Freemasonry higher than that of Master Mason.[15] Although some Masonic bodies and orders have further degrees named with higher numbers, these degrees may be considered to be supplements to the Master Mason degree rather than promotions from it.[16] An example is the Scottish Rite, conferring degrees numbered from 4° up to 33°.[25] It is essential to be a Master Mason in order to qualify for these further degrees. They are administered on a parallel system to Craft or Blue Lodge Freemasonry; within each organization there is a system of offices, which confer rank within that degree or order alone.

In some Jurisdictions, especially those in continental Europe, Freemasons working through the degrees may be asked to prepare papers on related philosophical topics, and present these papers in open Lodge. There is an enormous bibliography of Masonic papers, magazines and publications ranging from fanciful abstractions which construct spiritual and moral lessons of varying value, through practical handbooks on organisation, management and ritual performance, to serious historical and philosophical papers entitled to academic respect.

Signs, grips and words

Freemasons use signs (gestures), grips or tokens (handshakes) and words to gain admission to their meetings and identify legitimate visitors. There is no evidence that these modes of recognition were in use prior to the mid-1600s when speculative, ie non-operative, members were first admitted to Lodges. The easiest way to determine an operative Mason's qualification was the quality of his work.[26]

From the early 18th century onwards, many exposés have been written claiming to reveal these signs, grips and passwords to the uninitiated. However, as Masonic scholar Christopher Hodapp states, since each Grand Lodge is free to create its own rituals,[27] the signs, grips and passwords can and do differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.[18] Furthermore, historian John J. Robinson states that Grand Lodges can and do change their rituals frequently, updating the language used, adding or omitting sections.[12] The logical conclusion of Hodapp's and Robinson's assertions is that any exposé is only valid for a particular jurisdiction at a particular time, and therefore may or may not be accurate with respect to modern ritual.

Landmarks

Main article Masonic Landmarks

The Landmarks of Masonry are defined as ancient and unchangeable precepts; standards by which the regularity of Freemasonic Lodges and Grand Lodges are judged. Each Grand Lodge is self-governing and no single authority exists over the whole of Freemasonry. The interpretation of these principles can and does vary, leading to controversies of recognition.

The concept of Masonic Landmarks appears in Masonic regulations as early as 1723, and seem to be adopted from the regulations of operative masonic guilds. The term Landmark is generally understood in America by the definition of Dr. Albert Gallatin Mackey. In 1856, Mackey attempted to set down the 25 Landmarks, as he saw them. He laid down three requisite characteristics: (1) immemorial antiquity (2) universality (3) absolute irrevocability. In 1863, George Oliver published a Freemason's Treasury in which he listed 40 Landmarks. A number of American Grand Lodges attempted the task of enumerating the Landmarks; from West Virginia (7) and New Jersey (10) to Nevada (39) and Kentucky (54).[28]

Charitable effort

Outside the ritual context the fraternity is widely involved in charity and community service activities, as well as providing a social outlet for the members.

Money is collected only within the membership, to be devoted to charitable purposes. Freemasonry worldwide disburses substantial charitable amounts to non-Masonic charities, locally, nationally or internationally. However in earlier centuries the charitable funds were collected more on the basis of a Provident or Friendly Society, and there were elaborate regulations to determine a petitioner's eligibility for consideration for charity, according to strictly Masonic criteria.

Masonic charities include:

  • Homes[29][30] that provide sheltered housing or nursing care.
  • Education with both educational grants[31] or residential education[32] which are open to all and not limited to the families of Freemasons.
  • Medical assistance.[33]

Membership requirements

Freemasonry initiation. 18th century

A candidate for Freemasonry must apply to a Private (or Constituent) Lodge in his community, obtaining an introduction by asking an existing member. In some jurisdictions, it is required that the petitioner ask three times, however this is becoming less prevalent.[34] In other jurisdictions, more open advertising is utilized to inform potential candidates where to go for more information. Regardless of how a potential candidate receives his introduction to a Lodge, he must be freely elected by secret ballot in open Lodge. Members approving his candidacy will vote with "white balls" in the voting box. Adverse votes by "black balls" will exclude a candidate. The number of adverse votes necessary to reject a candidate, which in some jurisdictions is as few as one, is set out in the governing Constitution of the presiding Grand Lodge.

General requirements

Generally to be a regular Freemason, a man must: [15]

  • Be a man who comes of his own free will.
  • Believe in a Supreme Being.
  • Be at least the minimum age (18–25 years old depending on the jurisdiction).
  • Be of sound mind and body (Lodges do not deny membership to a man because of a physical disability; this is largely a historical holdover, and if a potential candidate says there will be no problem, he will be taken at his word), of good morals, and of good repute.
  • Be free (or "born free", i.e. not born a slave or bondsman. As with the previous, this is largely a historical holdover, and can be interpreted in the same manner as it is in context of writing a will. Some jurisdictions have removed this requirement).
  • Have character references, as well as one or two references from current Masons, depending on jurisdiction.

A candidate is asked 'Do you believe in a Supreme Being?'. Since an initiate is obligated on the sacred volume which is applicable to his faith, a sponsor will enquire as to an appropriate volume once a decision has been made on the applicant's suitability for initiation.

A number of Grand Lodges allow a Lewis, (the son of a Mason), to be initiated earlier than the normal minimum age for that jurisdiction, although no earlier than the age of 18.

Some Grand Lodges in the United States have a residence requirement, candidates being expected to have lived within the jurisdiction for certain period of time, typically six months.[35]

It is notable that the requirement for the candidate to have a belief in a Supreme Being is present in some, but not all, Co-Masonic bodies, leading to a significant divergence in organisational direction and philosophy.

Masonic temple in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Membership and religion

Freemasonry explicitly and openly states that it is not a religion, nor a substitute for religion. "There is no separate Masonic God", nor a separate proper name for a deity in any branch of Freemasonry.[36][37]

Regular Freemasonry requires that its candidates believe in a Supreme Being, the interpretation of the term being subject to the conscience of the candidate. This means that men from a wide range of faiths, including Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and Hindus can all become Masons.

Since the early 19th Century, in the irregular Continental European tradition - irregular to those Grand Lodges in amity with UGLE - a very broad interpretation has been given to a (non-dogmatic) Supreme Being; in the tradition of Baruch Spinoza and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe - or views of The Ultimate Cosmic Oneness - along with Western atheistic idealism and agnosticism.

The Freemasonry that predominates in Scandinavia, known as the Swedish Rite, accepts only Christians.[18]

Women and Freemasonry

The position of women and Freemasonry is complex and without an easy explanation. Traditionally, only men can be made Freemasons in Regular Freemasonry. Many Grand Lodges do not admit women because they believe it would break the ancient Masonic Landmarks. However, there are many female orders associated with regular Freemasonry, such as the Order of the Eastern Star, the Order of the Amaranth, the White Shrine of Jerusalem, the Social Order of Beauceant and the Daughters of the Nile. In addition, there are many non-mainstream Masonic bodies that do admit both men and women or exclusively women.

Co-Freemasonry

Co-Freemasonry is one such body. It is a form of Freemasonry admitting both men and women. Since women are not generally allowed in Freemasonry, it is not officially recognized by most Masonic Lodges & Grand Lodges, and is held by them to be 'irregular'. The systematic admission of women into International Co-Freemasonry began in France in 1882.

History

The first Grand Lodge formed in Freemasonry was The Grand Lodge of England (GLE), founded in 1717, when four existing London Lodges met for a joint dinner. This rapidly expanded into a regulatory body, which almost all English Lodges joined. From the 1750s onwards, two competing English Grand Lodges vied for supremacy - the "Moderns" (GLE) and "Ancients" (sometimes spelled "Antients") Grand Lodges. They finally united in 1813 to form the present United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE).

Goose and Gridiron, Home to a London Lodge forming GLE

The Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland were formed in 1725 and 1736 respectively. Freemasonry was exported to the British Colonies in North America by the 1730s - with both the English "Ancients" and the "Moderns" Grand Lodges (as well as the Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland) chartering offspring ("daughter") Lodges, and organizing various Provincial Grand Lodges. After the American Revolution, independent US Grand Lodges formed themselves within the State boundaries. Some thought was briefly given to organizing an over-arching "Grand Lodge of the United States", with George Washington as the first Grand Master, but the idea was short-lived. The various State Grand Lodges did not wish to diminish their own authority by agreeing to such a body.[38]

The oldest jurisdiction on the continent of Europe, the Grand Orient de France (GOdF), was founded in 1728. Most English-speaking jurisdictions cut formal relations with the GOdF, however, around 1877.[18] The Grande Loge Nationale Française (GLNF)[39] is currently the only French Grand Lodge that is in regular amity with the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) and its many concordant jurisdictions worldwide.

Originally, there was mutual recognition between UGLE and the Grand Orient de France. However, this was changed when the Grand Orient de France removed the term of the Great Architect of the Universe at their convention in 1877, following the request of the Protestant clergyman Fréderic Desmons who stated that Freemasonry is based on unconditional freedom of conscience and human solidarity; nobody is excluded because of its belief. The United Grand Lodge of England removed their recognition of the Grand Orient de France, and soon afterwards the majority of Grand Lodges around the world followed suit. A Schism was formed. Additionally, while the Grand Orient de France has no female Freemasons itself, it has mutual recognition with Co-Freemasonry, which admits both women and men as Freemasons. Female Co-Masons are allowed to attend the rituals of the GOdF. These are the main reasons, why "regular" Grand Lodges consider "liberal" lodges to be irregular. "Regular" Freemasons are not allowed to take part of the rituals of "liberal" Lodges, although they are recognized by "liberal" lodges and made welcome if they do.

Due to the above history, Freemasonry is often said to consist of two branches not in mutual regular amity:

  • the UGLE and concordant tradition of jurisdictions (termed Grand Lodges) in amity, and
  • the GOdF, European Continental, tradition of jurisdictions (often termed Grand Orients) in amity.

In most Latin countries, the GOdF style of European Continental Freemasonry predominates, although in most of these Latin countries there are also Grand Lodges that are in regular amity with the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) and the worldwide community of Grand Lodges that share regular "fraternal relations" with the UGLE. The rest of the world, accounting for the bulk of Freemasonry, tends to follow more closely to the UGLE style, although minor variations exist.

Contemporary challenges

As with other fraternal organisations in the 21st Century, Freemasonry in some districts of the United States, the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions has been losing members faster than it can replenish them.[40] The Masonic Service Association of North America (MSANA)[41] attributes the loss to six possible causes:[42]

  • A downward cycle
  • Loss of the Vietnam generation
  • Busy lifestyles
  • Joining organizations is no longer fashionable
  • Loss of Masonic identity
  • Lack of energy invested in Masonry

Opposition to Freemasonry

Anti-Masonry (alternatively called Anti-Freemasonry) is defined as "Avowed opposition to Freemasonry".[43] However, there is no homogeneous anti-Masonic movement. Anti-Masonry consists of radically differing criticisms from sometimes incompatible groups who are hostile to Freemasonry in some form.

Religious opposition

Freemasonry has attracted criticism and suppression from theocratic states and organised religions for supposed competition with religion, or supposed heterodoxy within the Fraternity itself, and has long been the target of conspiracy theories, which see it as an occult and evil power.

Christian anti-Masonry

Although members of various faiths cite objections, it is certain Christian denominations that have had the highest profile negative attitudes to Masonry, banning or discouraging members from being Freemasons.

The objections raised by the Catholic Church are based on the allegation that Masonry teaches a naturalistic deistic religion which is in conflict with Church dogma. However, those Grand Lodges in amity with UGLE explicitly adhere to the principle that "Freemasonry is not a religion, nor a substitute for religion. There is no separate 'Masonic deity', and there is no separate proper name for a deity in Freemasonry".[44] The Catholic Church is also troubled by Masonry's openness to members of other faiths, feeling that any organization which fails specifically to endorse their faith implicitly rejects it.[45]

A number of Papal pronouncements have been issued against Freemasonry. The first was Pope Clement XII's In Eminenti, April 28 1738; the last was Pope Leo XIII's Ab Apostolici, October 15 1890. In 1983, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (who became Pope Benedict XVI in 2005) as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued Quaesitum est. This states that "...the Church’s negative judgment in regard to Masonic association remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden. The faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion." Freemasonry welcomes Roman Catholics as members.[46] In 2005 the Regular Grand Lodge of Italy (RGLI), in amity with UGLE[47] announced that it had installed a Roman Catholic Priest as its Chaplain. (This office requires that the holder be a Freemason, but not necessarily be in Holy Orders).[48]

The negative reaction of "Grand Orient" Continental European Freemasonry to what was perceived as Catholicism's theocratic and authoritarian political influence has in countries such as Italy, Spain and Portugal historically tended towards anticlericalism, secularism and at times even total Anti-Catholicism.[49]

By contrast to Catholic allegations of rationalism and naturalism, Protestant objections are likely to be based on allegations of mysticism and occultism. Such authors may cite Albert Pike as an authority for the position of Masonry on these issues. However, Pike is but one American commentator amongst many. No one voice has ever spoken for the whole of Freemasonry. [50]

During the career of Archbishop Geoffrey Fisher many Church of England Bishops were Freemasons[4]. Fisher himself rose to very senior masonic rank.[5] At this time perhaps only a small proportion of members of the Church of England would have seen any incongruity in adherence to Anglican Christianity and the practice of Freemasonry. In recent decades hostility to Freemasonry has probably increased within Anglicanism, perhaps due to the increasing prominence of the evangelical wing of the church. The current Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, appears to harbour deep reservations about Masonic ritual, whilst being anxious to avoid causing offence to Freemasons inside and outside the Church of England.[6] In 2003 he felt it necessary to apologise to British Freemasons after he said that their beliefs were incompatible with Christianity and that he had barred the appointment of Freemasons to senior posts in his diocese when he was Bishop of Monmouth.[7]


Political opposition

In 1799 English Freemasonry almost came to a halt due to Parliamentary proclamation. In the wake of the French Revolution, the Unlawful Societies Act, 1799 banned any meetings of groups that required their members to take an oath or obligation.[51] The Grand Masters of both the Moderns and the Antients Grand Lodges called on the Prime Minister William Pitt, (who was not a Freemason) and explained to him that Freemasonry was a supporter of the law and lawfully constituted authority and was much involved in charitable work. As a result Freemasonry was specifically exempted from the terms of the Act, provided that each Private Lodge's Secretary placed with the local "Clerk of the Peace" a list of the members of his Lodge once a year.[51] This continued until 1967 when the obligation of the provision was rescinded by Parliament.[51] Regular Freemasonry inserted into its core ritual a formal obligation: to be quiet and peaceable citizens, true to the lawful government of the country in which they live, and not to countenance disloyalty or rebellion.[20] A Freemason makes a further obligation, before being made Master of his Lodge, to pay a proper respect to the civil magistrates.[20] The words may be varied across Grand Lodges, but the sense in the obligation taken is always there in regular Freemasonry.

Freemasonry in America faced political pressure following the disappearance of anti-Masonic agitator Willian Morgan in 1826. Reportage of the "Morgan Affair" helped fuel an Anti-Masonic movement, culminating in the formation of a short lived Anti-Masonic Party which fielded candidates for the Presidential elections of 1828 and 1832.

Even in modern democracies, Freemasonry is still sometimes accused of being a network where individuals engage in cronyism, using their Masonic connections for political influence and shady business dealings. This is officially and explicitly deplored in Freemasonry.[20] It is also charged that men become Freemasons through patronage or that they are offered incentives to join. This is not the case; no one lodge member may control membership in the lodge and in order to start the process of becoming a Freemason, an individual must ask to join the Fraternity "freely and without persuasion."[20]

In Italy, Freemasonry has become linked to a scandal concerning the Propaganda Due Lodge (aka P2). This Lodge was Chartered by the Grande Oriente d'Italia in 1877, as a Lodge for visiting Masons unable to attend their own lodges. Under Licio Gelli’s leadership, in the late 1970s, the P2 Lodge became involved in the financial scandals that nearly bankrupted the Vatican Bank. However, by this time the lodge was operating independently and irregularly; as the Grand Lodge d'Italia had revoked its charter in 1976.[52] By 1982 the scandal became public knowledge and Gelli was formally expelled from Freemasonry.

The UK Labour government, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, attempted to require all members of fraternal organisations who are public officials to make their affiliation public.[53][54] This was challenged under European human rights legislation, and the government in enacting the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law,[55] had to curtail the scope of their requirements.[56] Arrangements for the declaration of Freemasonry membership have been established for the current Lay Magistracy, Judiciary, and voluntary registration was introduced in 1999 for the Police Service.[57] Decisions on whether information should be released are the responsibility of the public authority receiving the request, on a case-by-case basis, acting in accordance with the principles of the Freedom of Information Act, 2000.[58]

Cultural references

There are many books, plays, movies, Television shows, etc. that include references to Freemasonry. Those listed below are those where Freemasonry figures prominently. There are many books and websites dedicated to giving a more complete list of cultural references to Freemasonry.[59]

  • Leo Tolstoy's novel War and Peace contains many references to Freemasonry. When Pierre Bezhukov, one of the main characters, becomes a Freemason his initiation (which follows a European form) is described.
  • The plot of Mozart's opera Die Zauberflöte ("The Magic Flute") contains several references to Masonic ideals and ceremonies. Mozart and his librettist Emanuel Schikaneder were both members of Lodge of the Nine Muses, a Masonic Lodge.
  • The plot of the 2004 movie National Treasure revolves heavily around the Freemasons and is somewhat unusual in that it depicts them in a benign light.
  • In The Baron in the Trees Italian writer Italo Calvino includes Masonic Lodges branching out into the lands of Ombrosa with the protagonist of the novel, Cosimo di Rondo, mysteriously and supposedly involved with them.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Freemasonry and Religion (UGLE) Accessed 12 June 2006
  2. ^ http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09771a.htm 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia. (1911 Encyclopædia Britannica agrees)
  3. ^ a b c Emulation Ritual ISBN 0-85318-187-X pub 1991, London
  4. ^ a b Constitutions (UGLE) pdf file, Page xii. Accessed 12 June 2006 Cite error: The named reference "Const" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ The Secrets of Freemasonry Grand Lodge of North Carolina Accessed 12 June 2006
  6. ^ What is Freemasonry (UGLE) Accessed 12 June 2006.
  7. ^ a b YQA:Is Freemasonry a secret society (UGLE) Accessed 12 June 2006 Cite error: The named reference "YQA" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  8. ^ Pro Grand Master UGLE, MQ on-line Issue 15 p43 Accessed 12 June 2006
  9. ^ Freemasonry and Secrecy (MSANA) Accessed 9 June 2006.
  10. ^ a b c Is Freemasonry a secret society (UGLE) Accessed 12 June 2006 Cite error: The named reference "secrets" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  11. ^ Freemasonry and Secrecy (Victorian Lodge of Research No 218, UGLV) Accessed 12 June 2006.
  12. ^ a b John J. Robinson, A Pilgrim's Path, M. Evans and Co., Inc. New York, p.129
  13. ^ Who is Prince Hall?, accessed November 14 2005.
  14. ^ Prince Hall Masonry Recognition details, Paul M. Bessel, accessed November 14 2005
  15. ^ a b c d e http://www.grandlodge-england.org/pdf/cr-rule-update2-141205.pdf Aims and Relationships of the Craft
  16. ^ a b Beyond the Craft, Keith B Jackson, ISBN 0-85318-248-5, 2005
  17. ^ 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica
  18. ^ a b c d Freemasons for Dummies, Christopher Hodapp, ISBN 0-7645-9796-5, Hungry Minds Inc, U.S., 2005. Cite error: The named reference "Dummies" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  19. ^ http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-10/p-61.php.
  20. ^ a b c d e f UGLE Freemasons Accessed February 23 2006.
  21. ^ UK Government information on Courts system Accessed March 8 2006.
  22. ^ Masonic Civil and Military Oaths compared by UGLE Accessed March 8 2006.
  23. ^ Masonic oath 1650 to 1750 Accessed March 8 2006.
  24. ^ Feudal Oath on the Bible Accessed March 8 2006.
  25. ^ http://www.supremecouncil.org/faq/
  26. ^ Coil, Henry W. (1961). Articles: "Grip," pg. 306; "Modes of Recognition," pp. 504-506; and "Word," pg. 690. Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia, (rev. ed. 1996). Richmond, Va: Macoy Publ. Co.
  27. ^ http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-10/p-61.php
  28. ^ Masonic Landmarks, by Bro. Michael A. Botelho. Accessed [[7 February, 2006.
  29. ^ http://www.rmbi.org.uk/
  30. ^ http://www.grandlodgescotland.com/glos/FMH/info.html
  31. ^ http://www.rmtgb.org/
  32. ^ http://www.royalmasonic.herts.sch.uk/pages/default.asp
  33. ^ http://www.nmsf.org
  34. ^ Ill. Ernest Borgnine, 33°, G.C., Receives 50-Year Pin "Illustrious Borgnine also told of the difficulties he had in becoming a Mason. He did not know that, at the time, it was necessary to ask three times" accessed July 12 2006.
  35. ^ http://www.ilmason.org/Basic1/bainfo.htm
  36. ^ UGLE: Is Freemasonry a religion?, accessed January 21 2006.
  37. ^ http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-13/p-46.php
  38. ^ Revolutionary Brotherhood, by Steven C. Bullock, Univ. N. Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1996
  39. ^ Template:Fr The Grande Loge Nationale Francaise (GLNF), accessed February 6 2006.
  40. ^ Cornerstone Society: Whither Directing our Course
  41. ^ [1]
  42. ^ [2]
  43. ^ Oxford English Dictionary (1979 ed., p. 369).
  44. ^ UGLE: Is Freemasonry a religion?, accessed January 21, 2006.
  45. ^ Letter of April 19 1985 to U.S. Bishops Concerning Masonry by Cardinal Bernard Law
  46. ^ Freemasonry:Your Questions Answered (UGLE) Accessed 19 June 2006
  47. ^ Regular Grand Lodge of Italy (RGLI) Accessed 19 June 2006
  48. ^ Catholic News Agency reported on August 8 2005
  49. ^ The fifth point, advocating or condoning overthrow of Church and State, may possibly have some basis if one makes the error of equating the Italian Masonry of the period with the entire Masonic Fraternity. From their founding, the Latin Grand Lodges, if not explicitly anticlerical, were strongly (at times, militantly) political. Thus it is quite possible that there may have been some basis in fact for the charge. The Miter and The Trowel by William G. Madison, MPS
  50. ^ "In preparing this work [Pike] has been about equally Author and Compiler." (p. iii.) "The teachings of these Readings are not sacramental, so far as they go beyond the realm of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth. The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word "Dogma" in its true sense of doctrine, or teaching; and is not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term. Everyone is entirely free to to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound." (p. iv) Pike, Albert. Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Washington, DC : Southern Jurisdiction, 1958. 1950 revision.
  51. ^ a b c UGLE History Accessed March 8 2006.
  52. ^ [3] Accessed October 31 2006
  53. ^ Lord Sainsbury of Turville’s reply, Lords Hansard, 13 May 2002: Column WA9 (UK House of Lords Daily Debates) Accessed March 4 2006.
  54. ^ UK House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, 3rd Report on FM in the Police & Judiciary, printed 19 March 1997. Accessed March 4 2006.
  55. ^ UK Act, 1998 Accessed March 5 2006.
  56. ^ UGLE Statement Accessed March 4 2006.
  57. ^ Mr. Denham's reply, Hansard, 24 February 2003 : Column 329W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) accessed 12 May 2006.
  58. ^ Hazel Blears’ reply, Hansard, 21 July 2005 : Column 2191W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) accessed 12 May 2006.
  59. ^ For example, see:MLC - Masonic Leadership Center website about Freemasonry in Culture: Movies, TV, Books, & other Entertainment
  60. ^ Harry Carr, “Kipling and the Craft”, Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, vol. 77, London: 1964. pp. 207-8.& pp. 213-253. Accessed 25 October, 2006

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA