Jump to content

User talk:Mdd: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Line 112: Line 112:


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#a117f2;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#df00fe;">Mississippi</span>]]</span> 23:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#a117f2;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#df00fe;">Mississippi</span>]]</span> 23:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

:Thanks {{Ping|Star Mississippi}}, I took a look at the text wrote still online at archive.org, see [https://web.archive.org/web/20221218010857/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_of_Enterprise_Architecture_Professional_Organizations here]. Could you explain why you ruled the section "Common Perspectives on Enterprise Architecture, 2013" out as copyright vio, while it is actually a compilation of four quotes and added together with four half a sentences? -- [[User:Mdd|Mdd]] ([[User talk:Mdd#top|talk]]) 00:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:44, 15 March 2023

request for assistance for a Dutch subject

Hi Mdd, I found your name when I was working on an article about Dutch ceramicist Sophie Verrijn Stuart. She was a student of Bert Nienhuis. In 2015 you created the English translation of the article about him. The reason I am contacting you today is that I am working on an English version of an article Nederlandsche Vereeniging voor Ambachts- en Nijverheidskunst. I would like to add information on why the organization was formed, and I am not finding any information in English. The corresponding article in Dutch is unsourced and does not discuss why it was formed. I suspect it had something to do with Art Guilds and employment, especially as they created yearbooks from 1915 to 1940. The book Vrouwen in de vormgeving in Nederland 1880-1940 pp 124 - 143 has information on the topic. I do not read Dutch or German and I cannot copy and paste the text into Google translate. Would you possible have the time or inclination to help me with improving the V.A.N.K article? If not would you know someone who reads Dutch who might? Thanks for considering this. Best Regards, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @WomenArtistUpdates:. The 2007 work by Marjan Groot gives a lot of details about people affiliated with the VANK, but little about VANK itself. You can find an introduction of VANK and its origins in the book Goed in vorm: honderd jaar ontwerpen in Nederland by Mienke Simon Thomas (2008) at p. 41 and more (full access at Google.books). There is a translation available "Dutch Design: A History" (2008) with only limited access on Google. I will see what I can do in assisting in improving the Dutch and English article on VANK, but this can take a while. -- Mdd (talk) 11:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Mdd! I think the Thomas book (translated) will be extremely helpful. I was already able to add reasons why the organization was founded. I do hope you have some time to tinker with the articles. Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:Daniel Craig McCallum by The Brady National Photographic Art Gallery.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 21, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-01-21. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel McCallum

Daniel McCallum (21 January 1815 – 27 December 1878) was a Scottish-born American railroad engineer, general manager of the New York and Erie Railroad, and a brevet major general in the Union Army during the American Civil War. He is known as one of the early pioneers of management; in 1855, he designed an illustrative organization chart of the New York and Erie Railroad, considered to be the first modern organizational chart. It provides a plan of the organization, showing the division of administrative responsibilities and the number and class of employees engaged in each department.

Photograph credit: Brady National Photographic Art Gallery; restored by Adam Cuerden

Recently featured:

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onze Kunst van Heden

Hi Mdd, I approach you hat-in-hand again. I am working on the English article on Onze Kunst van Heden. Any information you can add about this exhibit would be appreciated. Specifically, I am wondering if the show was juried or if it was related to membership in a particular artist association. Also, the source of artists, ARTindex Lexicon Online, only lists 700 of the 750 artist because the interface only allows for 700 results. I have written them (in English) requesting T -Z, but haven't heard back from them after several weeks. Any ideas on how to get those names? I do have the list of artists in Excel and could work to revise it for the Dutch Wikipedia, if you think that would be worthwhile. I would like to hear your thoughts on this before I spend time coding. Best regards, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The exhibition was an initiative of nl:Frederik Schmidt Degener, see also here. This newspaper article stated the exhibition was jury-free. Each artist could contribute four art works. -- Mdd (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the information and citation! Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Systems theory contribution by Len Troncale

Hello Mdd, Four former students and now colleagues of Len Troncale (including myself) have written and referenced a possible Wikipedia page titled "Systems processes theory." Would you be consider being its source? I can send the content to you as a google doc link or pdf, or in any form that you suggest. Thanks for all of the contributions you've made over the years! Lynn Rasmussen — Preceding unsigned comment added by LynnRas (talkcontribs) 20:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Raines Rules" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Raines Rules. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 6#Raines Rules until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrew11374265 (talk) 08:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Roel Wieringa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, primary sourced academic. Fails WP:NPROF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SailingInABathTub (talk) 12:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Diversey company, 2018.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Diversey company, 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 13:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"SF author" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SF author and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#SF author until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sithmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sithmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sithmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Leschnei (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project Management Institute updates

Hello! I'm Acacia, an employee of the Project Management Institute. I'm looking for an editor to help me make a couple of small changes to the PMI article and see that you did a lot of work on it years ago. The updates I am looking for are to add mention of the current CEO to the article, and remove one redundant word from the Infobox. You can see my edit request here. Because of my COI I won't edit the article directly. If you're available to help I'd appreciate it. Thanks very much! PMIAcacia (talk) 14:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this is a notable association

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 23:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Star Mississippi:, I took a look at the text wrote still online at archive.org, see here. Could you explain why you ruled the section "Common Perspectives on Enterprise Architecture, 2013" out as copyright vio, while it is actually a compilation of four quotes and added together with four half a sentences? -- Mdd (talk) 00:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]