User talk:Enigmaman

If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. The same applies to you. If I leave a message on your page, I keep it watchlisted and I'll see when you reply. Thank you.

Inactive admins

What did you mean by "All the old admins who haven't edited since before 2007 cannot be reached by e-mail"... Are you saying the "email this user" function didn't exist prior to that? Gigs (talk) 20:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

That is my understanding. If you check, you'll see you can't e-mail any of them. I did try at one point. What discussion are you referencing, by the way? Enigma^msg 20:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Inactive_admin_email Gigs (talk) 18:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I just wanted to give my thanks to you for protecting the article LeBron James over the past day. I don't know how to give barnstars or anything, but I am very happy people like you are always improving wikipedia. Plus, quite frankly, as a die-hard Cleveland fan the vadalism was especially annoying. :) JakeH07 (talk) 02:47, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Puzzled

Not to be obtuse, but could you clarify what edit(s) you were speaking of on my talk page? I'm not aware of any incivility on my part, but of course, if I slipped and got snarky, or even if it is simply a difference of interpretation, I certainly would want to know specifically what I had done. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Well, I found what you were upset about. Hmmmm. Yeah, you're right, I went over the top with that. Not sure why I was so vehement at the time. Yeah, I meant what I said, I do think it's ridiculous to place a huge tag where we just need a little icon, but I certainly didn't have to vent as I did. Thanks for putting me in my place. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 21:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

If you look at 95+% of my protections, I do use the smaller tag. This time I went with the non-small one, but since I added an edit notice, it's probably unnecessary. Probably the main purpose for the full-size tag is for newbies/IP editors who can't edit the article and don't know how to suggest improvements. It is large and unwieldy though. Enigma^msg 21:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Just one more bauble for your collection

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		For not allowing your judgement and actions to be swayed by slights or invectives from other, less civil, editors, I award you this Barnstar of Integrity. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 11:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

This is for this edit; many a lesser administrator would have said "screw you" after my comments on the talk page. You are obviously a stand-up guy. Glad to have met you. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 11:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

A pleasure to meet you as well. :) Enigma^msg 15:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

98.82.X, log in and use an account. We could definitely use your experienced help! 144.124.220.251 (talk) 00:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Question

I'm a new user to Wikipedia and I was wondering how experienced you must be to be able to edit a semi-protected article.NBA Fan7 (talk) 02:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk. Enigma^msg 02:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. NBA Fan7 (talk) 02:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Block of 61.18.170.182

Hi --- I notice you blocked 61.18.170.182 [1]. But it isn't an open proxy --- it's one of a range of IP addresses used by iCable (one of the largest ISPs in Hong Kong, with hundreds of thousands of users). They assign IPs dynamically, and reassign them quite often. Often I'll be editing, and then suddenly find after pressing "submit" that I've been rotated onto one of the IPs which have been mistaken for an open proxy and have been blocked. Is it possible to get this unblocked? Thanks, cab (talk) 05:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'll take your word for it. I'm not sure I remember why I blocked it. I think it was because it was among a group of proxies vandalizing my talk page. Enigma^msg 02:00, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion without a proper discussion of List of Jewish pacifists, peace activists and supporters ‎

I protest the underhanded deletion of List of Jewish pacifists, peace activists and supporters ‎ without my (as recent leading contributor) or others knowledge in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish pacifists, peace activists and supporters. Noone properly made any announcement in my talk page. I currently cannot involve much in Wikipedia. I will apply AFD when I have time. If non-content creating anti-spam "mod" Enigma^msg goes on his long term attacks on Jewish peace activist or supporters' pages that I create or contribute by WP:wikihounding more then we have some issue. Also unsourced is a clear misinformation, since the proper references are already available in wikipedia articles. I also demand a copy of the list article content. Kasaalan (talk) 10:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Personal attacks and demands from you. It was not underhanded. I created an AfD and opened it up for the community. Enigma^msg 14:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

I provided a copy of my comment for JClemens, unlike you who did not bother to inform me before or during AFD. Since my "personal attacks" that you couldn't reply are based on clear evidence about you misinformed/misreplied answers during RFA, I do not consider you as a true "mod" who contributes content to wikipedia anyway. You misinformed other editors about your "contributions" in a sense you actually created content as a real mod would do. You are the "other" editor. Your reply is an attack itself. Do not WP:Wikihounding the pages I created/contributed more according to your personal political/racial/religious views. Do not try to AFD unless you note other contributing editors, which is a basic procedure that applies for anyone. I took enough of your anti-Jewish peace movement actions in wikipedia, don't you think. This is not the first time you engage in Israel related AFDs that I created/contributed even though you claim you have no expertise/interest/knowledge/POV/COI over the issue. Kasaalan (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

ANI Notice

An anon has brought you to ANI. You can find the post here. Sorry this wasn't brought to your attention sooner. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 05:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Anon who reported you was blocked for 24 hours for 3RR violations by Nyttend. ANI thread is still up, of course, if you want to comment. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 05:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Enigma^msg 06:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Jim Joyce

You impress me again. You seem to be everywhere BLP vandalism is. Great job overall. JakeH07 (talk) 02:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Really just the things that catch my eye. I should've been there faster because I was watching when it happened. Kudos to the admin who protected. Enigma^msg 02:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Protection please, sir.

[2] - Little buggers keep ignoring the hidden notice there! Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 06:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done I really should've full protected since you didn't specify. ;) Enigma^msg 12:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

You, sir, are a Saint. Thank you. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 11:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Related to the above is this guy doing the old unsourced-changing-genres milarky. I've given him the uw-genre1 warning and hopefully he'll stop but I don't want to be on Wikipedia anymore. At least not for a long while. Would you be able to just watchlist one or two of those article's? You'll catch him in the act again, I presume, when he comes back online. Also, do you happen to know where I can find that self-exclusion script that you used a while back? I want to help on Wikipedia but I don't know if I'm ready to come back full time, if you know what I mean? Anyways, thanks very much in advance and I do hope you are well. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 09:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done and Wikipedia:WikiProject_User_scripts/Scripts/WikiBreak_Enforcer. Enigma^msg 15:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Take care and keep Wiki safe. I'll see you in 6 months hopefully! Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 08:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for the help

Glad I could help :) Please let me know if I can be of assistance again in the future. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 19:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Apologize for University of Florida edits

• I apologize for reverting what I considered to be vandalism on the University of Florida article. I have a track record of counter-vandalism if you see my edits in the past. I agreed with User:Dirtlawyer1's original assessment that it was vandalism, but should have known better. I apologize, but I was actually trying to get an administrator to lock the page. Jccort (talk) 03:53, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

• Quite frankly I think this does not deserve to be on the official University of Florida article. Perhaps this should be placed under the Bernie Machen article, or perhaps Criticism of college and university rankings (North America). I would like to create a discussion page so that we can get input from all of the editors of Wikipedia. How could I go about doing that? Jccort (talk) 03:53, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

• It sounds like you're referring to a Request for Comment. But that's not necessary yet. The first step is to discuss on the article's talk. I'm glad to see you've already opened the discussion there. Editors who are interested in the article will likely have it watchlisted, and have the opportunity to weigh in. If it is clear that a majority, or what can be looked at as a consensus, favors your opinion, then you would be more justified in editing, and someone edit-warring while refusing to discussed would be blocked. But just reverting back and forth is not productive, and often leads to blocks for the editors involved, which is not the desired outcome. Enigma^msg 04:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

• FWIW, Enigmaman, I am not sure how much "good faith" we can or should assume in the context of a rookie editor with a self-apparent agenda to insert as many negative passages into as many University of Florida-related WP articles as he can, using as much non-NPOV language as other editors will allow him to get away with. This has always been one of the biggest problems with Wikipedia, that someone with an agenda gets treated with the same courtesy and respect as others who are simply trying to write and edit balanced articles that recite facts. A simple review of Derekstevens recent edits reveals that virtually all of them have been made to University of Florida-related articles, are always one-sidedly negative in both substance and tone (see WP:NPOV), and are invariably and disproportionately verbose in comparison to the surrounding passages (see WP:WEIGHT. It a strange concept, indeed, of "free speech" that permits the loudest and most obnoxious voice the most latitude.

• Moreover, Derekstevens' first attempt at editing the University of Florida main article clearly include WP vandalism WP:Vandal—one need look no further than his insertion of the blog-sourced attempt at humor related to "jorts." This deserves no assumption of good faith; this is merely someone testing the WP self-regulated environment to see what he can get away with. Only after he was called out on his initial attempts at disruptive editing did he evolve his strategy to play by his limited understanding of WP NPOV and verifiability standards. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

• POV-pushing != vandalism, even if what you say is correct. Enigma^msg 16:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

• Yes, but the insertion of Jeffrey Dahmer as a prominent alumnus probably does. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Ricky Powell

[Warning: boilerplate] You participated in the AfD for "Ricky Powell", an AfD that resulted in its deletion. It has since been re-created. I discovered this today and (as suggested here by WereSpielChequers) restored the deleted versions and am notifying all the participants of the AfD -- or anyway all who were logged in with user IDs that they still seem to be using. If you think the article doesn't meet WP standards you may to nominate it for deletion a second time. Indeed, if you think it is a blatant re-creation of the deleted article you may nominate it for speedy deletion (or speedily delete it yourself). Please don't reply here; I shall not be watching this page. -- Hoary (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar

Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 14:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for signing up for the July Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two and a half years, all the way back to the beginning of 2008! We're really going to need all the help we can to get it down to a manageable number. We've ambitiously set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog this month. In order to do that, we're going to need more participants. Is there anyone that you can invite or ask to participate with you? If so, we're offering an award to the person who brings in the most referrals. Just notify ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! or Diannaa ^TALK of who your referrals are. Once again, thanks for your support! Diannaa ^TALK 02:26, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Ria Cortesio

Hi, Your recent edit to this made the article somewhat "Enigmatic"! You deleted the mention in the lead of what sport was involved - baseball wasn't mentioned until the 4th sentence! PamD (talk) 08:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Whoops. Thanks for sorting. Enigma^msg 14:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Re:False positive

Thanks. I was afraid that something like that would happen when I made the edit in the first place. 98.169.16.74 (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Notability?

Greg_Packer_(DJ) 86.3.61.125 (talk) 06:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Not notable, IMO. Enigma^msg 15:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Prod'd. Man, I shouldn't even be doing this stuff! Wiki is too addictive. I'll annoy you again in 7 days. 86.3.61.125 (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

It's up for deletion; you gave your opinion on it already but now is the time to put it in its right place ;-) 86.3.61.125 (talk) 08:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

When BLP meets NPOV

Thank you for your thoughtful comments at my talk regarding the Koman Coulibaly article. While I still pretty much stand by my actions there, I certainly took your opinion on board and would take them into consideration were a similar situation to occur again (as it doubtless will). The key thing to understanding this is maybe (and I don't know your background so don't want to patronize you; how well up on football culture are you?) that referees are traditionally not very accountable to players or fans; not commenting or explaining their decisions is pretty much the norm. Commenting on a ref not explaining a controversial decision (especially when the game only ended around 24 hours ago) still seems to cross from NPOV breach to BLP breach in an article about a living person. YMMV of course, so thanks again for your input. --John (talk) 03:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Pretty well up on football culture. I've been closely following the World Cup, and as I said on your talk, I know they are not required to explain themselves to anyone. I don't really think that really affects whether the bit about him not explaining what the call was should be in his Wikipedia article. I don't think it's a BLP issue to say that he didn't explain the call. Thanks for the message, Enigma^msg 04:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

DO

Coming soon to a Wiki near you...The Third Great Wikipedia Dramaout will be July 5-9. Please join us for serious content creation! Signup is here. You have received this message because you participated in The Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout.

I see you have signed up for the last dramaout. Consider notifying 3 good editors of this to encourage more participation. Perhaps saying

I am participating in this. Please consider doing the same! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians 15:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

GW

[3]. Chewed him out a month ago, seems not to have received the message. --King Öomie 12:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done Enigma^msg 14:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

This guy... More specifically: Two IPs fighting over genres.

87 was warned and has since stopped. The article was fully protected for a week, which is pretty ridiculous, but I'm not blocking over stale edit-warring.

This account, too.

Blocked. We should have a genre troll/warrior block template. :)

This guy again... He's been warned before too and had a block for edit warring on Korn back in 09.

Warned again.

And that's User:Utan Vax/Genre troll IPs checked. Thanks E-man. 86.3.61.125 (talk) 09:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for checking the list! Enigma^msg 15:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Lemme whip up a template. --King Öomie 15:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

{{BlockGW}} --King Öomie 15:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Enigma^msg 15:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Block please --King Öomie 17:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

 Done Enigma^msg 18:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Libs reported this fellow on UV. Obv needs rollbacking and warning. Use your buttons! 86.3.61.125 (talk) 01:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

With all the changes, I lost my Twinkle buttons and my rollback all button. :( I'm editing like a commoner now. :P Enigma^msg 02:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

LeBron James protection

May I ask why you removed the pending changes protection? During the 24 hours it was under the pending changes, there were only 5 occurrences of pending changes that needed to be reviewed (admittedly none were accepted) and the page is essentially the same to the public. This isn't 4chan or Barack Obama which were terrible ideas, none of the edits were even malicious (unless you count the rumors and speculation). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I merely restored semi-protection, which I can't see why it was removed. Enigma^msg 13:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I listed it here for trial on the pending changes system, another admin reviewed it from the queue and thought it would work. In my view, having only the approved versions show up to the public is a significant BLP reduction. Second, because the set of approved reviewers is much smaller than the simple set of autoconfirmed editors, less vandals can have their edits seen (to the public, at least). Again, compare the edits just before and the edits during the period. None of User:Angsc09's edits for example would be seen by the public and in my opinion the article looks more stable (and has a lot more people watching). And as to "merely restoring semi-protection", I'm not interested in a fight but I really don't think you should individually restore it to a particular protection because it doesn't have a discussion (and this isn't much of a discussion). Protection policy has never required discussion before changes. Either way, I'll drop the issue now and put a note that it's been removed from the trial. --- 00:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

It merited indef semi based on previous protections and the continued vandalism. When you overturn another admin's action, it's courtesy to either first ask them, or, if you don't want to wait, at least notify them of what you've done. I had absolutely no way of knowing of why it was unprotected, because there was no note left on my page, or on the article talk page. Finally, please sign so I don't have to go to my talk history. Thanks, Enigma^msg 00:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the signature. One tilda off. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Was it Tilda Swinton perchance? Unless you meant Tilde =D --King Öomie 15:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Enigmaman. You have new messages at Martin H.'s talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Backlog Elimination Drive Has Begun

Hello, I just wanted to take a moment and announce that the July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive has started, and will run for a month. Thanks for signing up. There's a special prize for most edits on the first day, in case you've got high ambitions. Enjoy! ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 04:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Florio/Vikings

On the Florio/Vikings thing, just listen to the podcast linked. It's Mike Florio himself on Paul Allen's KFAN radio show. It doesn't get any more "reliable" than that. I already went through this with another editor, Eagles247, and we resolved to leave it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.226.220.162 (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I replaced it with a better reference; a New York Times article about Profootball talk, which can be a great source for the Wikipedia article. Enigma^msg 20:37, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Kevin

Hi Enigmaman. The current article does seem rather unwieldy when it lists Catalonia and Spain separately. Regardless of the aspirations of the Catalan people, an independent Catalonia is not yet internationally recognised and I feel it should be deleted as it is covered by Spain. Would you? If not, would you please give me your reasons Jatrius (talk) 11:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Which article? Cheers, Enigma^msg 17:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

My apologies for the tardy response, KEVIN - as in the given name.Jatrius (talk) 22:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I looked there and I'm not certain which part of the article you mean. Enigma^msg 22:24, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Me thinks me just found a CosmicLegg puppet... only to see them retire their account at the exact same time.

What a start to the morn... and I haven't even had a coffee yet. Wiki libs (talk) 12:50, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi! This message is just a friendly reminder that you signed up to participate in the GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive. I noticed that you haven't logged a single copy edit yet. We'd love to see you participate! The drive runs three more weeks so there's still plenty of time to earn barnstars. Thanks! --Diannaa ^TALK 21:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I feel bad about it. I'll try to see if I can clear some time, but this month has been busy. Enigma^msg 22:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm not!

You guys just have the wrong genres down so don't say that! I only changed two! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrator (talk • contribs) 03:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Please Help, Kobe Bryant page disagreement

I added recently uploaded images of Kobe Bryant's 81 point game (arguably Bryant's single biggest achievement of his career) and added them into the article like so: link.. Yet It appears user:Jimarey doesn't want this included into the artcile and refuses to even discuss the matter by just reverting my edits without an explanation whatsoever. In my attempt to talk with him in his profile link, he doesn't even respond and reverts my edit with no summary yet again: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kobe_Bryant&action=history

Can you please help us resolve this issue? would really appreciate it. -- ĴoeĴohnson|2 20:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

First step is to go to the article talk page and open a discussion. Enigma^msg 05:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Done.link -- ĴoeĴohnson|2 06:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Offending editor now blocked. I'm glad you brought this to my attention. He's a serial edit-warrior. Enigma^msg 06:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Didn't want to get to this point where a user is a blocked, but there was really no other option when a user is so hell bent on not communicating with anyone, hopefully he comes back a better contributor thats open to discussion. Anyways, thanks for the help Enigmaman, really appreciate it. -- ĴoeĴohnson|2 09:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey Enigmaman, Is this a sock puppet of his? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jimjet89 his edit history contributions are very similar.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jimarey -- ĴoeĴohnson|2 19:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Yep. Blocking both accounts indefinitely. Enigma^msg 21:31, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Troy Davis case

Enigmaman, this article is very biased and needs some serious BLP cleanup. It is about a man on death row who is claiming innocence and is currently awaiting a new trial. The problem is that only evidence for Mr. Davis' innocence is mentioned. I'd like to have an article which presents both sides of the story, especially because the case is open. I know you do a lot of BLP work and I'd like to have some help. Thanks a lot. JakeH07 (talk) 02:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but right now I don't have the time to do a review of the article. If there's anything specific I can help you with, let me know. Enigma^msg 19:02, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Newsletter

GOCE July 2010 backlog elimination drive chart Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! We have now passed the halfway point, so here's an update. Progress Report - Progress toward the targets has been good. 751 articles out of the approximately 1,600 we would like to get completed by the end of the month were done by July 15, so we will be very close to meeting the target for volume. However, we would like to clear all of the 2008 articles from the backlog, and there are still 892 left to do. Please consider choosing one of these older articles when looking for something to copy edit. If we focus our firepower we can completely wipe out 2008 from the queue. Participation Report - 95 people signed up for the July drive. This is a great result compared to May, when we had 36. However, in May only one person that signed up didn't do any copy edits, and in July only 59 of the 95 have posted any copy edits on the big board. The task may seem insurmountable but please remember that if all 95 participants copy edit just one article a day from now until the end of the month, we will eliminate 1,300 more articles from the backlog. So please consider participating at whatever level you can! All contributions are appreciated. This newsletter was prepared for the GOCE by Diannaa (Talk), S Masters (talk), and The Raptor Let's talk.

Good word choice

Saw it at ANI.

[4]

I approve - concise and unyielding, yet little room for a retort or escalation and you showed who was boss without being personal, demeaning or insulting. A good use of language, well done. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 17:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate it. Enigma^msg 17:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Sock blocks

Hi. You were the admin that recently blocked socks (user:FunofWen1 and User:Hellowww2) of the following user: User:778Showen778. I am not sure quite how this can be dealt with but you may want to look at the following very similar pattern of behaviour that resutled in blocks: here. These ips have only been blocked on a temporary basis, so if they are the same user we can expect them to be using them again in a little under a week. If it is the same person then these accounts probably need a perminent block too. If you need someone to search out the detailed evidence for a case, or if there is some offical route for this that I couldn't find, let me know and I will do my best to help spread the burden. Thanks.--SabreBD (talk) 00:07, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for linking the case. I'll comment over there. Enigma^msg 01:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem and just to say all the effort is appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 07:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Please write the blocking reason

Please write the blocking reason 779Showen779 (talk) 07:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Block evasion of your original block. I think that suffices. Enigma^msg 07:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Why you block? I corrected did not break —Preceding unsigned comment added by WTF11113 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Abusive sockpuppetry and block evasion. Enigma^msg 05:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

One more

Well, this one also! Regarding this action of yours. Thanks in advance. --Tadija^speaks 20:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Let's wait to see if it edits again. Enigma^msg 15:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Here it is... 201.81.206.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) --Tadija^speaks 08:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

And again... Can this sock be stopped? 201.81.201.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -Tadija^speaks 13:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Enigma. Did you see this post of mine? --Tadija^speaks 09:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

And yet again. 201.81.198.210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) All of those are apparently one user. And he shows no will to cooperate in the future. template is temporally locked because of your request. But when it gets free to edit again, be certain I’ll be here to change it again. --Tadija^speaks 10:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including Jimbo Wales—signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody! Stats If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the May 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, your word totals are cumulative for barnstars (not the leaderboard). Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars. GOCE backlog elimination drive chart up to 31 July Eight people will receive The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar (100,000+ words): Chaosdruid, Diannaa, Ericleb01, Lfstevens, Shimeru, S Masters, The Utahraptor, and Torchiest. Bullock and Slon02 will receive The Order of the Superior Scribe (80,000+). The Barnstar of Diligence (60,000+) goes to Derild4921, GaryColemanFan, kojozone, and Mlpearc. The Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (40,000+) goes to A. Parrot, AirplanePro, Auntieruth55, Bejinhan, David Rush, and mono. Nobody will receive The Old School League of Copy Editors award (30,000+). The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (20,000+) goes to Backtable, Cindamuse, dtgriffith, Duff, e. ripley, Laurinavicius, NerdyScienceDude, and TEK. The Cleanup Barnstar (12,000+) goes to Brickie, Casliber, cymru lass, December21st2012Freak, Nolelover, TheTito, Whoosit, and YellowMonkey. The Working Man's Barnstar (8,000+) goes to Bsherr, Duchess of Bathwick, HELLKNOWZ, Mabeenot, noraft, Pyfan, and Richard asr. The Modest Barnstar (4,000+) goes to Adrian J. Hunter, Airplaneman, Annalise, Camerafiend, Cricket02, Fetchcomms, Gosox5555, LeonidasSpartan, Paulmnguyen, Piotrus, SuperHamster, Taelus, and TPW. Gold Star Award Gold Star Award Leaderboard Articles Words 5k+ Articles 1. Diannaa (248) Shimeru (200,392) Shimeru/Ericleb01 (13) 2. Slon02 (157) Diannaa (164,960) Chaosdruid (8) 3. GaryColemanFan (101) Chaosdruid (130,630) Derild4921 (7) 4. Torchiest (100) The Utahraptor (117,347) GaryColemanFan/Slon02 (6) 5. Shimeru (80) Ericleb01 (114,893) Bejinhan/The Utahraptor (5) Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa TALK and S Masters (talk) | Newsletter by: The Raptor You rang?/My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC).

Wiki-Conference NYC (2nd annual)

Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Prefix or No Prefix

There's a more structured and informed than usual discussion taking place regarding the The prefix being added to Ohio State University. As you've participated in the past, I thought I'd inform you in case you'd like to participate. OlYeller^Talktome 15:19, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I commented on the talk. To me, it's clear that there's no consensus or evidence sufficient enough to move the page. Enigma^msg 17:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Usernames

Should a username like User:Lesstroud be editing an article about Les Stroud? Picky and anal peeving, I know... but is ti worth the wheel-spin reporting at the username page? Wiki libs (talk) 16:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Looks like COI. The article does not look presentable about he got done with it. Not sure about reporting it. Enigma^msg 16:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I reverted the promotional edits and if he persists, I'll just block. Enigma^msg 16:23, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I didn't review the edits thoroughly... I just noticed the u_name vs. a_name. It's like... if someone to make an article about... say... "Annoying Wikipedia editors"... and a new account called 'user:wikiLibs' suddenly appeared started editing that article's section on "User:Wiki libs"... the Wiki libs wouldn't like the name on the new account...  :-). It's simple... Lesstroud shouldn't edit 'Les Stroud'. Have a nice day! Wiki libs (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

It's basically not bothering to make people work to see if it's COI. Obviously someone with that username shouldn't be editing the article, it's just that the only reason he's here is to promote himself. There's lots of COI where they don't make it so damn obvious. Check out the first paragraph after he was done with it. Enigma^msg 16:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive invitation

There are currently 2,511 articles in the backlog. You can help us! Join the September 2010 drive today!

The Guild of Copy-Editors – September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive The Wikipedia Guild of Copy-Editors invite you to participate in the September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive will begin on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on 30 September at 23:59 (UTC). The goals for this drive are to eliminate 2008 from the queue and to reduce the backlog to fewer than 5,000 articles. Sign-up has already begun at the September drive page, and will be open throughout the drive. If you have any questions or concerns, please leave a message on the drive's talk page. Before you begin copy-editing, please carefully read the instructions on the main drive page. Please make sure that you know how to copy-edit, and be familiar with the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Awards and barnstars A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GoCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page. Thank you; we look forward to meeting you on the drive! — ɳorɑfʈ Talk! and S Masters (talk).

Outing?

This is a serious accusation you make. If it is true, then the information is out. Can you provide evidence? RomaC ^TALK 07:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)