Jump to content

Psychic bid: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+info +ref
Line 33: Line 33:
* {{cite book |last = Sims |first = Dorothy Rice |authorlink = Dorothy Rice Sims |title = Psychic Bidding |publisher = Vanguard Press |location = New York |page = |series = |year = 1932 |doi = |LCCN = 32014125 |OCLC = 4311409 |isbn = }}
* {{cite book |last = Sims |first = Dorothy Rice |authorlink = Dorothy Rice Sims |title = Psychic Bidding |publisher = Vanguard Press |location = New York |page = |series = |year = 1932 |doi = |LCCN = 32014125 |OCLC = 4311409 |isbn = }}
* {{cite book |last = Karpin |first = Fred |authorlink = |title = Psychological Strategy in Contract Bridge |publisher = Harper & Brothers Publishers |location = New York |page = |series = |year = 1960 |doi = |LCCN = 60-10409 |OCLC = |isbn = }}
* {{cite book |last = Karpin |first = Fred |authorlink = |title = Psychological Strategy in Contract Bridge |publisher = Harper & Brothers Publishers |location = New York |page = |series = |year = 1960 |doi = |LCCN = 60-10409 |OCLC = |isbn = }}
* [https://www.gratismediumchat.nl/en/free-psychic-medium-reading/ Absolutely free Psychic Medium Reading]


{{WPCBIndex}}
{{WPCBIndex}}

Revision as of 04:02, 5 June 2018

Psychic bid (also psych, pronounced to rhyme with like) is a bid in contract bridge that grossly misstates the power and/or suit lengths of one's hand. It is used deliberately to deceive the opponents. Normally, the psychic bid is made with a weak hand, overstating its overall strength, the length and strength in a particular suit, or both. (The noun is occasionally misspelled as psyche, through confusion with Psyche, a character in a myth concerning Venus and Cupid.)

Origins

As an early frequent user of the technique, Dorothy Rice Sims is often thought to be the originator of the psychic bid; however, according to bridge player and writer, Albert Morehead, "She did not actually invent the psychic bid, though it is generally credited to her, but she did give it its name and she wrote the first and only book about it."[1][2][4] and is regarded as having coined the term "psychic".[5][6][7]

Examples

 Q6432  73  1053  J83

After two successive passes, this hand might be opened with 1 as a psych, trying to stop opponents from reaching a likely game or even slam. Some might open with a 1 psych, to confuse matters further. Of course, there is always a danger that the partner will double the opponents on the basis of opener's presumed strength, or support the psychic opening at too high a level.

 AQ3  AJ9  53  QJ852

North opens 1 and South can see that game in notrump is probably the best prospect. South might support clubs directly, bid 2NT, or temporize with 1 or 1. But South might instead bid 1, a psych that attempts to talk the opponents out of a diamond lead against 3NT.

 53  J42  KQJ1083  106

Right-hand opponent opens 1. Instead of preempting in diamonds, South can bid 1NT to confuse matters, running to diamonds if doubled. This type of psych is referred to as the comic notrump.

Some psychic bids are so common that they are often referred to as mini-psychs. For example, many would consider a hand such as  53  Q642  QJ85  1084 to be an automatic 1 bid after partner opens 1 and the right-hand opponent doubles for takeout—it is made in an attempt to talk the opponents out of their likely spade fit, subsequently escaping to 3 if necessary.

Regulations

Per rules of the game, the partner of a player who has psyched must not take advantage of any special knowledge of the partnership's habits. So a partnership that uses occasional psychic bids must take care to ensure full disclosure — not only of its formal bidding system but also of its habits. For example, if a partnership tends to psych under certain circumstances, it is much better prepared to recognize a psych, and to cope with it, than are its opponents. The game's Laws and Proprieties therefore require disclosure of the partnership's tendency.

In duplicate bridge, sponsoring organizations often impose a number of restrictions on psychic bids. For example, psychs of strong artificial opening bids (such as strong two clubs) are not allowed by the American Contract Bridge League (ACBL).[8] In addition, if the partner is perceived to have bid abnormally due to taking account of a psych, then the score may be adjusted. Also, if the partnership has an agreement about a "check bid" or psychic control, used to verify the psych, such convention is referred to as a brown sticker and may be banned from certain levels of competition.

See also

References

  1. ^ Bridge Beat 23, Dorothy Rice Sims. ACBL. February 22, 2012. Retrieved 2014-11-16.   With photo.
  2. ^ "Contract Bridge: Bridge Loses Last of Its Most Colorful Foursome, Dorothy Rice Sims". Albert Hodges Morehead. The New York Times. March 26, 1960. Page 18.
  3. ^ Vanderbilt, Harold S. (July 1929). Contract Bridge: Bidding and the Club Convention. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 143–144. ASIN B000857ZZU.
  4. ^ Harold S. Vanderbilt refers to "bluff bidding", one type of psychic bidding, in his 1929 book Contract Bridge.[3]
  5. ^ "Bridge" (untitled column). Alan Truscott. The New York Times. May 26, 1994. Retrieved 2014-11-16. The column is illustrated by a deal from the 1930s, featuring a "psychic" bid by Mrs. Sims. The linked archive copy (nytimes.com) does not include the crucial diagram.
  6. ^ "Bridge" (untitled column). Alan Truscott. The New York Times. August 23, 1997. Retrieved 2014-11-16. The linked archive copy does not include the crucial diagram of a recent deal featuring David Berah.
  7. ^ "BRIDGE; The Treachery That Lurks In Psychic Bidders' Hearts". Alan Truscott. The New York Times. April 15, 2000. Retrieved 2014-11-16. The linked archive copy does not include the crucial diagram of a deal featuring David Berah in the 1964 South American Championships (team Venezuela).
  8. ^ Some authorities disagree with this approach, stating that such a prohibition amounts to giving the force of law to the personal preferences of bridge administrators. However, to do so is not illegal, because the Laws give sponsoring organizations the right to regulate the use of conventions. How Would You Rule?, Bridge World Magazine, 1978, page 43.

Further reading