Jump to content

User talk:Nthep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 11:36, 30 June 2012 (Signing comment by GC Jack - "Quintinshill 4 Children: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:UserTalkArchiveBox

Barnstars

The Original Barnstar
Awarded for your excellent work, almost single-handedly penning the article on Federation of Stoke-on-Trent. --EchetusXe 14:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Modest Barnstar
In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.48 (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse Barnstar
For your wonderful work at being friendly, helpful and passionate about your work and assistance at the Teahouse. Thank you Nthep! Sarah (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was especially inspired by the great response you gave to TheMikeBlackSpecial, and the great response he gave you. It's truly times like this when I say "The Teahouse works and is awesome!" Thank you! Sarah (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Barnstar
Whenever I look at the Q&A forum you are always there, doing a wonderful job at assisting new editor's as a Teahouse Host. Thank you Nthep for your Wikipiedia volunteerism and your wonderful and solid work at supporting new Wikipedians. Your contributions are appreciated! Sarah (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Original Barnstar
I felt you tidied up my article, on the County Road Cutters, expertly. Jackoasisdavies (talk) 16:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Slytherining Around32

Re your message: I deleted all of the duplicates uploaded from the NPG. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:00, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nthep. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Teahouse/Host lounge.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 09:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Tea Leaf - Issue Four

Hi! Welcome to the fourth issue of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter for the Teahouse!

  • Teahouse pilot wraps up after 13 weeks After being piloted on English Wikipedia starting in February, the Teahouse wrapped up its pilot period on May 27, 2012. We expect this is just the beginning for the Teahouse and hope the project will continue to grow in the months to come!

Thank you and congratulations to all of the community members who participated - and continue to participate!

  • What you've all been waiting for: Teahouse Pilot Report is released! We look forward to your feedback on the methodology and outcomes of this pilot project.
  • ....and if a pilot report wasn't enough, the Teahouse Pilot Metrics Report is out too! Dive into the numbers and survey results to learn about the impact the Teahouse has made on English Wikipedia.
  • Teahouse shows positive impact on new editor retention and engagement
  • 409 new editors participated during the entire pilot period, with about 40 new editors participating in the Teahouse per week.
  • Two weeks after participating, 33% of Teahouse guests are still active on Wikipedia, as opposed to 11% of a similar control group.
  • New editors who participated in the Teahouse edit 10x the number of articles, make 7x more global edits, and 2x as much of their content survives on Wikipedia compared to the control group.
  • Women participate in the Teahouse 28% of Teahouse participants were women, up from 9% of editors on Wikipedia in general, good news for this project which aimed to have impact on the gender gap too - but still lots to be done here!
  • New opportunities await for the Teahouse in phase two as the Teahouse team and Wikipedia community examine ways to improve, scale, and sustain the project. Opportunities for future work include:
  • Automating or semi-automating systems such as invites, metrics and archiving
  • Experimenting with more ways for new editors to discover the Teahouse
  • Building out the social and peer-to-peer aspects further, including exploring ways to make answering questions easier, creating more ways for new editors to help each other and for all participants to acknowledge each other's efforts
  • Growing volunteer capacity, continuing to transfer Teahouse administration tasks to volunteers whenever possible, and looking for new ways to make maintenance and participation easier for everyone.
  • Want to know how you can lend a hand at the Teahouse? Become a host! Learn more about what makes the Teahouse different than other help spaces on Wikipedia and see how you can help new editors by visiting here.
  • Say hello to the new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, as being welcomed by experienced editors is really encouraging to new Wikipedians.

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 17:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse log info

Hi Nthep. Regarding the helpme request we both responded to, since this was a edit filter issue, the edit was never made, but it's details are recorded in the Special:AbuseLog. You can see the entries here. I said this in less detail at the helpme request but I didn't know if you would see that. It's not an issue that comes up a lot so many editors are unfamiliar with its existence. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I'd read some about edit filters but not enough to know about this log NtheP (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quintinshill 4 Children

Hi I don't know if you want to have a go at ammending this one.

My OR which of course,can't be used here, clearly suggests from a newspaper report at the time that the four were on the Glasgow express and may well have been refugees, possibly Belgian heading for Falkirk.

However, as I have said on the talk page the reference to the Railway Company believing they were stoways has no foundation. Check the wording in the Thomas book.

Best wishes,

Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by GC Jack (talkcontribs) 11:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]