Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers
Voicing an opinion on an itemFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...
Please do not...
Suggesting updatesThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
November 25
November 25, 2021
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
November 24
November 24, 2021
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
Murder of Ahmaud Arbery verdict
Blurb: All three men, George McMichael, Travis McMichael, and William Bryan Jr., are found guilty in the Murder of Ahmaud Arbery (Post)
News source(s): CNN, The New York Times BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Andise1 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Ending to a major court case related to racial issues in the US. Andise1 (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Is it really necessary to discuss such a case again? I refer to here. Yet another case with zero international impact and interest, yet another case of a purely local trial. Far from being akin to the conviction for the murder of George Floyd. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alsoriano97 If "international impact" was required for postings, very little would be posted. 331dot (talk) 20:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, but it should be much more decisive when it comes to court rulings than in other cases (sports, science, elections...). If the follow-up of a trial has a very low international coverage/interest, will you tell me that it's not an important requirement to take into account when determining whether a court case is blurb-worthy or not? So many people are condemned every day in this world... _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Respectfully, we aren't talking about someone convicted of robbing the corner store, but a black man who was murdered basically for being in the wrong neighborhood in a part of the United States where convictions for this sort of thing are rare. And as I said, this incident has influenced changes in laws. 331dot (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, laws of a single U.S. state (as far as I know). If it were at the federal level I might come to support it, but not at this one. And many are the events that trigger legislative changes. And without a doubt, the article is in excellent shape. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Respectfully, we aren't talking about someone convicted of robbing the corner store, but a black man who was murdered basically for being in the wrong neighborhood in a part of the United States where convictions for this sort of thing are rare. And as I said, this incident has influenced changes in laws. 331dot (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, but it should be much more decisive when it comes to court rulings than in other cases (sports, science, elections...). If the follow-up of a trial has a very low international coverage/interest, will you tell me that it's not an important requirement to take into account when determining whether a court case is blurb-worthy or not? So many people are condemned every day in this world... _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alsoriano97 If "international impact" was required for postings, very little would be posted. 331dot (talk) 20:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support. This was a highly followed trial in the US, and even before the verdict this incident resulted in changes in Georgia law(the elimination of citizens' arrests). 331dot (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Article is also of decent quality from what I can see. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- this verdict is likely to influence future trials of this type in the United States, and it is an historic decision in an area of the country known for its virulent racism. I doubt a jury would have reached this verdict in that area even 20 years ago. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support High profile case with notable legal impact, quality article. SpencerT•C 21:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support. This is a newsworthy verdict, and the article is in good shape from a skim-through. -- Tavix (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose people found guilty of crime that they themselves were stupid enough to video. Seriously. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It's gotten a lot of attention for emotional reasons, and on a human level the crime was shocking. But its long-term significance is likely to be minimal. People are murdered every day all over the world. Some get a lot of press attention. We almost never post them. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's already had long term significance, both legally and perhaps socially. This was not a garden variety murder. I don't understand this line of thinking more generally. If this event is not notable due to not having "long term significance", it should be proposed for deletion. 331dot (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not at all, there does exist a middle ground between ITN and AFD. This is a prime example. It's the result of a clear-cut murder case which the perps videoed themselves. A no-brainer. What would have been newsworthy would have been this ending in a non-guilty verdict and the no-doubt ensuing riots. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- They taped it because they were in their mind attempting to make a citizens arrest(which was banned after this incident) even though they had no evidence of a crime. And in Georgia and elsewhere this is, rightly or wrongly, not clear cut. Even 15 years ago these men might have got off. And there was doubt Derek Chauvin would be convicted for killing George Floyd even though that was on video. 331dot (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it's nuanced and emotive but ultimately it's just another crime story. It's been whipped up with publicity and is precisely the reason that we need to apply some common sense to these kinds of nominations. It is of minimal long term significance. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- If this crime had occurred in the 1960s or earlier with the same verdict, I'd support posting due to its obvious significance. But it's not 1961. It's 2021 and in this day and age racial lynchings, when they happen, typically end up with long jail sentences. The man was murdered. His killers were tried and convicted in open court. Where's the long term significance? Again, this is not 1961 where there would have been a great deal of shock at this outcome. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Then it should be proposed for deletion. I am going to now withdraw from this discussion as I am finding it frustrating that we are drifting away from our mission here. This is on me and me alone, no one else. 331dot (talk) 23:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- If this crime had occurred in the 1960s or earlier with the same verdict, I'd support posting due to its obvious significance. But it's not 1961. It's 2021 and in this day and age racial lynchings, when they happen, typically end up with long jail sentences. The man was murdered. His killers were tried and convicted in open court. Where's the long term significance? Again, this is not 1961 where there would have been a great deal of shock at this outcome. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it's nuanced and emotive but ultimately it's just another crime story. It's been whipped up with publicity and is precisely the reason that we need to apply some common sense to these kinds of nominations. It is of minimal long term significance. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- They taped it because they were in their mind attempting to make a citizens arrest(which was banned after this incident) even though they had no evidence of a crime. And in Georgia and elsewhere this is, rightly or wrongly, not clear cut. Even 15 years ago these men might have got off. And there was doubt Derek Chauvin would be convicted for killing George Floyd even though that was on video. 331dot (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not at all, there does exist a middle ground between ITN and AFD. This is a prime example. It's the result of a clear-cut murder case which the perps videoed themselves. A no-brainer. What would have been newsworthy would have been this ending in a non-guilty verdict and the no-doubt ensuing riots. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's already had long term significance, both legally and perhaps socially. This was not a garden variety murder. I don't understand this line of thinking more generally. If this event is not notable due to not having "long term significance", it should be proposed for deletion. 331dot (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article is in good shape, well referenced, and story is currently being adequately covered by reliable sources. Meets all requirements. --Jayron32 22:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Similar to the Rittenhouse verdict - limited notability, outcome that isn't nationally or globally significant in any game-changing or important way. Prism55 (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose This wasn't a case with the same scope as the George Floyd killing , it had no ties to terrorism and did not create any major unrest from the original event (nor the verdict), and outside of the event, none of these people are notable. This is the type of thing we absolutely should NOT be posting to ITN. --Masem (t) 23:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- I vehemently disagree with the idea that there must be global protests and riots in order to post a highly notable criminal conviction. We are supposed to follow the news at least somewhat and we have a great article to feature. 331dot (talk) 23:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- This isn't a notable criminal conviction - all parties involved are BLP1E. It's a highly-covered story, but given the bias our sources have towards US-based stories, this is not a surprise. And no, we're not supposed to follow the news - we aren't a news ticker. That's what the Current Events page is for. --Masem (t) 23:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- I vehemently disagree with the idea that there must be global protests and riots in order to post a highly notable criminal conviction. We are supposed to follow the news at least somewhat and we have a great article to feature. 331dot (talk) 23:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
English channel disaster
Blurb: 31 people die whilst crossing the English channel (Post)
Alternative blurb: 31 people die whilst crossing the English channel, in the channel's worst disaster in modern times
Alternative blurb II: 31 people die whilst crossing the English channel in a dingy.
News source(s): https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/calais-migrant-drowning-is-worst-ever-in-english-channel-official-says/ar-AAR5RlY https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/11/24/20-migrants-die-boat-capsizes-channel-near-calais/
Credits:
- Nominated by Llewee (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Article needs work but clearly a serious incident which should be posted once the page is ready Llewee (talk) 18:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait ... pending development of article, now a 150-word stub, more than half reactions. Whilst? – Sca (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. Article is not developed enough to be ready for the main page. If that is fixed, it can be posted. Also, none of the blurbs link the article. That will need to be fixed. --Jayron32 20:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- fixed now Llewee (talk) 21:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
(Removed) Ongoing removal: 2021 Belarus–European Union border crisis
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: The article has not has any significant updates for a week, and thus fails the ongoing criteria: In order to be posted to ongoing, the article needs to be regularly updated with new, pertinent information
. If there have been significant updates in the last week, these should be added, but right now, this article fails the ongoing criteria. In particular, the last significant update is older than the day of the oldest ITN event (21 November), which is a general rule for something not being updated enough for Ongoing. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Remove. I think Belarus cleared out migrants from the border; Putin must think he made his point. 331dot (talk) 12:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Remove. The migrants have been moved away from the border and the situation has calmed down. No longer an ongoing event. Modest Genius talk 13:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – Although the situation appears to have been at least partially defused, there have been reports in recent days that in some cases Belorussian guards have continued to help migrants breach the border into Polish territory. [1], [2] [3] – Sca (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Remove the existence of news coverage that Sca notes is a necessary but not sufficient condition for maintaining an ongoing link. The article also needs to have been continuously updated. That clearly didn't happen here. --Jayron32 20:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – I have read the reports mentioned by Sca. It appears as if the situation have slowed down, but not ended. So still Ongoing.BabbaQ (talk) 20:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Removed. SpencerT•C 21:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) Magdalena Andersson
Blurb: Magdalena Andersson (pictured) is elected by the Riksdag as the first female Prime Minister of Sweden. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Following the resignation of Stefan Löfven, Magdalena Andersson (pictured) is elected by the Riksdag as the first female Prime Minister of Sweden.
Alternative blurb II: Magdalena Andersson (pictured) is elected as the first female Prime Minister of Sweden.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by BastianMAT (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: ITNR, as it falls under "Changes in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government, in those countries which qualify under the criteria above, as listed at List of current heads of state and government except when that change was already posted as part of a general election". First female prime minister of Sweden. BastianMAT (talk) 09:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment she takes office on the 26th (according to her article). Until that point, the blurb isn't correct, as she only becomes the first female PM of Sweden on that date. Is it usual to post when it's announced, or when they take office? Joseph2302 (talk) 10:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Usually when they are elected but yeah with the blurb of being elected. BastianMAT (talk) 10:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - First female PM in Sweden. But change blurb to ”is elected” instead becomes.BabbaQ (talk) 10:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Significant as new PM and first female. Perhaps the blub should be "elected by the Riksdag" since she didn't gain office through a normal election (by the people). cart-Talk 10:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- That's normal in a parliamentary system. – Sca (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The blurb should probably start with "Following the resignation of Stefan Löfven, ..." to provide context, since this was not an election outcome but a government reshuffle. --Tone 10:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support now the blurb has been changed to "is elected" seems fine to run now. Agree with Tone that we should make it clearer that this wasn't an election that caused this. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Her article looks great, is ITNR and altblurb, although somewhat long, it's the most complete and clear of all. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 11:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posting. --Tone 11:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Would suggest that we use the image of Andersson at the front page.BabbaQ (talk) 11:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Agree with this, we usually use the image for the newest blurb. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Post-posting support This is historic. -TenorTwelve (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Since Sweden's in the EU, perhaps she'll become the next Merkel. – Sca (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Then again, maybe not. – Sca (talk) 20:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Since Sweden's in the EU, perhaps she'll become the next Merkel. – Sca (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Update by the nominator Things are looking bad for her and her party now. The Center Party (liberal) voted for the opposition’s budget and it got through. The Center party did not agree with the goverment’s budget, stating it was way too left. That would mean Magdallena now has to rule with right wing economic politics, which she accepted. However their junior party the Green party did not accept it and have left the goverment meaning a new Riksdag election for the prime minister post shall be held. Interesting development. SVT BastianMAT (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Update 2 by nominator Magdallena Andersson has officially resigned. We might have to pull the news back as she won’t be assuming office. She will only assume office if she wins a new prime minister vote, which might take place in a few days/weeks, depending on how the talks with the speaker goes. SVT BastianMAT (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pull (or update the blurb). Her resignation is quickly making international news. 142.182.136.105 (talk) 17:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Update blurb Move over Kim Campbell, there's a new sheriff in town. Or more precisely, there was one for a few hours.Scaramouche33 (talk) 17:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pull until it's confirmed whether she will now be the leader or not. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose pull What is ITNR is that a few hours ago she has been elected by the Swedish parliament. However much she has resigned. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- What updating with "and immediately resigns" or something? This is a really weird sequence of events. --Tone 18:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pull - The blurb, as it currently stands, is false.--WaltCip-(talk) 18:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Updated to
Magdalena Andersson (pictured), shortly after being elected as the first female prime minister of Sweden, resigns.
Any further changes, please? --PFHLai (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)- I think this is fine now. --Tone 19:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not a big fan of blurbs that contemplate the resignation of a prime minister...But knowing a bit of precedent, it's very likely that in a few days/weeks she will be re-elected, as happened with Löfven in the middle of this year. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- For the record, I support this new blurb. It will work until she is finally elected the new PM in a few days or at the longest a week.BabbaQ (talk) 20:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. Hopefully, we'll have an update about her taking office soon. That would be a simple update to do. --PFHLai (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pull -- wait until she actually is seated. She just resigned. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- The blurb already says that. It's fine. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's probably just my own bias here; but it seems silly to post this when she just resigned. Forming coalition governments in a parliamentary system is weird. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's a fascinating and encyclopedic story. Unlike the myriad legal cases being spewed out of the US these days. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's probably just my own bias here; but it seems silly to post this when she just resigned. Forming coalition governments in a parliamentary system is weird. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- The blurb already says that. It's fine. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART)
Blurb: NASA launches DART – the first attempt to change the course of an asteroid (pictured) (Post)
Alternative blurb: The Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft is launched on a mission to the asteroid Didymos and its moon Dimorphos (artist's impression pictured)
Alternative blurb II: The Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft is launched on a mission to attempt to deflect the course of the asteroid Dimorphos (artist's impression pictured)
News source(s): BBC, Guardian, NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Created by Frmorrison (talk · give credit)
- Updated by CRS-20 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: There's going to be a follow-up launching in 2024 and arriving in 2027 so it's quite a long-term plan. But it's in the news now. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support important mission with global implications, good article. Polyamorph (talk) 08:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. This may be notable as the first mission of its type (to post now); it will be ITNR when it arrives as well. Just saying. 331dot (talk) 08:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- This may be ITN/R per "first ... launches of any type of rocket" as it's the first mission to use the NEXT drive but that's debatable. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- The NEXT is the thruster on the spacecraft, not the rocket that put it up there(a Falcon 9). 331dot (talk) 12:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Such missions usually have multiple stages and each stage has separate rocket engines. The first stage is usually more spectacular but there's no scientific reason to prefer it. For deep space missions lasting years, the efficiency of the final spacecraft will be most important and this is a new design. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support important global mission (even if it does sound like DART is copying the plot of Salvation (TV series)). Added 3 cn tags to article, but apart from that, it looks more than good enough article quality for the front page. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Everyone in the world should be happy we'll finally have a way to stop any doomsday asteroids from wiping us all out. Dream Focus 11:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- If it works, of course... _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 11:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support is ITNR from what Andrew says and the global impact of this mission is undoubted, so it's clearly notable. In fact I think it should be one of the most important scientific news of the year. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 11:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Global impact?? I thought the idea was to avoid that! Martinevans123 (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- This event can't be notable, its only impact is on a small unpopulated asteroid! WaltCip-(talk) 14:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Global impact?? I thought the idea was to avoid that! Martinevans123 (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Impactfulness nonapparent at this pt. in time & space. – Sca (talk) 15:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment the proposed blurb is a mess. I've added alt1, though for some reason that's messing up the template formatting - I can't work out why. Modest Genius talk 13:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Also, this is not ITNR, as it's not a new type of rocket and interplanetary probes are ITNR when they arrive at their destination, not when launched. But the gap here is long enough (ten months) that it's reasonable to post both launch and arrival. Modest Genius talk 13:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Modest Genius: I fixed the formatting issue. Adding italics to either of the blurbs breaks it, because italics are already applied by default.--WaltCip-(talk) 13:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- The fact that the mission is attempting to alter the course of the asteroid makes this particularly notable. Added alt2. Polyamorph (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alt2 is incorrect. It won't 'deflect the course' of the asteroid. The impact will modify orbit of the moon around the asteroid, not either of their orbits around the Sun. Modest Genius talk 13:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Dimorphos is an asteroid (albeit a minor one compared to Didymos). It will deflect its course. Nothing to do with the Sun. Polyamorph (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It may deflect its course. – Sca (talk) 15:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It will deflect it, even if by only a negligible amount. But this is covered by the wording of alt2 "on a mission to attempt to deflect the course". Polyamorph (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- It may deflect its course. – Sca (talk) 15:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Dimorphos is an asteroid (albeit a minor one compared to Didymos). It will deflect its course. Nothing to do with the Sun. Polyamorph (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alt2 is incorrect. It won't 'deflect the course' of the asteroid. The impact will modify orbit of the moon around the asteroid, not either of their orbits around the Sun. Modest Genius talk 13:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment – From what I've seen, this is such a complicated, long-term project that any significant results may be years off. – Sca (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - no mention of Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck or Michael Bay. But seriously Support, though I'd recommend that gallery be trimmed down. --Masem (t) 15:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- You forgot to mention Taylor Swift. – Sca (talk) 15:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Sca: You mean Liv Tyler :) Brandmeistertalk 20:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- You forgot to mention Taylor Swift. – Sca (talk) 15:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support ALT2 Very significant, and definitely should be in ITN. Heythereimaguy (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support ALT2 – significant, interesting science story. Can "artist's impression pictured" go in the caption not the blurb? User:GKFXtalk 23:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support ALT2 Nice addition to the news . --Frmorrison (talk) 00:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
November 23
November 23, 2021
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Law and crime
|
RD: Omar Malavé
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El Nacional, Efecto Cocuyo
Credits:
- Nominated by NoonIcarus (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Venezuelan professional baseball player, coach and manager. NoonIcarus (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose article is a stub (851 characters), needs to be expanded before it will be accepted on RD. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Bill Virdon
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): MLB.com
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: GA article – Muboshgu (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Marking ready. Not sure if there's a consensus for the "managerial career" table needing a ref right in that section in baseball articles but the second external link covers that. SpencerT•C 23:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 01:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) Bulgaria bus crash
Blurb: At least 46 people are killed in a bus crash in Bosnek, Bulgaria. (Post)
Alternative blurb: At least 46 people are killed on the way from Istanbul to Skopje after a bus crashes and catches fire near Bosnek, Bulgaria.
News source(s): BBC, AP, Guardian, Reuters, dpa
Credits:
- Nominated by The Rambling Man (talk · give credit)
- Created by Scaramouche33 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Yxuibs (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Needs expansion The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support once the article is expanded. This is clearly a major tragedy which receives front-page coverage (ended up in an edit conflict while trying to nominate this myself). I've added an alternative blurb to mention that the bus caught fire following the crash as reported in the news.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment another of my articles nominated by The Rambling Man? Now you're just spoiling me Scaramouche33 (talk) 08:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Top news story and completely tragic loss of masses of life. What's not to nominate? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality right now the article is a stub, but I expect more information will come out at some point today, so article can be expanded. Event itself is ITN-worthy. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a bus plunge and so just routine news. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nope, it didn't "plunge", it crashed into a barrier and then caught fire, killing dozens of people. That's not routine anywhere. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Over a million people die on the roads every year – that's over 3,000 every day. The coverage of this case says that "there were often accidents in the area". It's routine. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- There may have been many accidents, even some fatalities. That section of road has probably been in need of improvement for decades. But not Europe’s worst bus crash for a decade. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oh Andrew, if you don't like it, perhaps you should nominate it for deletion? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 23:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- There may have been many accidents, even some fatalities. That section of road has probably been in need of improvement for decades. But not Europe’s worst bus crash for a decade. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Over a million people die on the roads every year – that's over 3,000 every day. The coverage of this case says that "there were often accidents in the area". It's routine. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nope, it didn't "plunge", it crashed into a barrier and then caught fire, killing dozens of people. That's not routine anywhere. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support on the merits; major tragedy receiving coverage, something which readers may be interested in learning more about. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support for now. Article is short, but just barely over stub stage. It appears to be fully referenced and not missing any details from what is known now. If the article is expanded as more information comes out (i.e. investigation etc.), consider this a full support. Reliable news agencies are covering the story. --Jayron32 13:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - per high number of deaths. Kind of short but expansion is very possible.BabbaQ (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - Start-class article. Hopefully this story and article will develop further given the significance.--WaltCip-(talk) 13:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment – Spot news quite widely covered, with substantial fatalities – but general significance may be questionable. – Sca (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Certainly looks more notable than 2021 Waukesha Christmas parade car rampage, which you voted support to... Joseph2302 (talk) 15:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not opposing it. – Sca (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - Exceptionally awful crash, as bad as many airplane crashes. Jehochman Talk 13:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - Awful event with a high number of deaths. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - no long-term impact, will be gone from the news entirely in a week. Banedon (talk) 14:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support now the expansion work has been done. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support the number of victims makes this accident one of those blurb-worthy. And the article is in good condition to be included in the Main Page. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 14:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted — Amakuru (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pull only significant to Bulgaria - not international news KingOfAllThings (thou shalt chatter!) 20:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I would think that you've been around ITN long enough to know "please do not oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive."--WaltCip-(talk) 20:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's also untrue - it also substantially affects North Macedonia. Jim Michael (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I would think that you've been around ITN long enough to know "please do not oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive."--WaltCip-(talk) 20:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
RD/Blurb: Chun Doo-hwan
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: Former President of South Korea Chun Doo-hwan (pictured) dies at the age of 90. (Post)
News source(s): AP, Reuters, NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by Comoelto (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Comoelto (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Article is almost entirely unref'd. However, if it can be brought up to scratch in time I'll support blurb. Davey2116 (talk) 05:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality The article needs some ref work. Once its fixed up, I would support a blurb. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- No Blurb Nothing but death at 90 (but I've nothing against a photo RD). InedibleHulk (talk) 07:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Large swathes of the article have no clear references. Agnostic on blurb vs. RD if the article quality is fixed. --Jayron32 12:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose massively undersourced. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality article is far from ready: needs a lot of sources. Neutral on blurb: I think that being treated as a "dictator" it has enough notability to have a blurb, but I prefer to read what other users think. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality Roh Tae-woo died a month ago and that article had no chance of being sufficient quality for the main page. This article also has massive gaps right now. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 22:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per everything mentioned above. Ping me when fixed and I change to support.BabbaQ (talk) 11:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
November 22
November 22, 2021
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Politics and elections
|
RD: Volker Lechtenbrink
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FAZ + many others
Credits:
- Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit) and Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: German actor with a unique voice, used for dubbing and country rock songs, also stage director and theatre and festival manager, remembered for his role in Die Brücke (film) at age 14 (or 15). Article was there but substantially expanded and sourced. Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
RD: Babette Smith
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Australian
Credits:
- Nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
- Created by Oronsay (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Australian colonial historian, mediator and business executive. TJMSmith (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Doug Jones (baseball)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS Sports
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I would point out that Doug Jones is a relatively common name(including a former US Senator and a Star Trek actor) so I don't think we should just post "Doug Jones" We discussed this issue once before but there doesn't really seem to be a consensus there. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support looks okay for RD. Neutral on whether we should list it as "Doug Jones" or "Doug Jones (baseball)" as there isn't a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the name (if there were, we should post with disambiguator, instead of being an WP:EASTEREGG. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted with his middle name (Reid) included in the link. --PFHLai (talk) 17:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
RD: Hilda Múdra
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): News Agency of the Slovak Republic
Credits:
- Nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
- Created by Marian Gladis (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Hergilei (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Austrian-born Slovak figure skating coach. TJMSmith (talk) 18:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support it's just about longer than a stub. Everything is well sourced (AGF on non-English language sources), would be good to add a little more content if available, though I imagine that may be difficult if sources are all in Slovakian. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Article lacks 3 complete well-rounded paragraphs for minimum content; one of the paragraphs is 3 sentences and another has 2. Could use a couple additional sentences in Career section for depth but close. SpencerT•C 22:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) 2021 Waukesha Christmas parade car rampage
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Five people are killed and at least forty are injured in an apparent vehicle-ramming incident during a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin (Post)
Alternative blurb: A Christmas parade car rampage in Waukesha, Wisconsin leaves five people dead and at least forty injured.
News source(s): CNN, AP, BBC, Guardian, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
- Created by TheEpicGhosty (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Love of Corey (talk · give credit) and Lightburst (talk · give credit)
- Support Well referenced, vehicle ramming attacks do not occur regularly in the US, and major RS across the world are reporting this. 99.247.176.90 (talk) 03:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait only to have more details (eg confirmed number of fatalities, suspected reason for what happened (eg was this intended as an attack , etc?) --Masem (t) 03:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Not ReadySupport While I agree that this is probably significant enough for ITN, the article is in the midst of a page change discussion and, while there are descriptions of the attack circulating the internet the section on the attack itself is currently only 1 sentence. Rockphed (talk) 04:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)- Seeing how the article has improved and that some information is starting to come out, I think this is ready. Rockphed (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait Notable but article lacks information. Nixinova T C 05:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support alt blurb. In the news and significant. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 05:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article will be updated once more information is known. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Opposearticle is barely a stub, appears to be a tragic accident. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)- Strong oppose apparently the fall-out from a domestic dispute. No different to a minor (in US terms) mass shooting, while tragic of course. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see how is this more notable than 2018 Mishui vehicle attack or 2020 Trier attack, and the article in its current shape doesn't convince me at all. This is most definitely not in the same league as 2016 Nice truck attack, 2016 Berlin truck attack, 2017 London Bridge attack and 2017 New York City truck attack.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- although we should wait until (at least) a suspect is released; as we still don't know what the motive was. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 08:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality article is just a stub. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Not terrorism, according to "sources", so whilst tragic, it appears to be a worse-than-usual crime gone wrong. Black Kite (talk) 08:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- It seems that around five people died in the attack. The perpetrator has been reported by a few media outlets as Daniel Brooks, a black man who raps under the name "MathboiFly" and has tons of social media posts supporting BLM, and this was in the aftermath of a very notable event where Rittenhouse was cleared as killing two black men in self-defence. OldPeace7068 (talk) 09:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Complete extrapolation. Police have said they believe he was on the run having committed a separate crime, nothing to do with Rittenhouse at all. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is there to report the facts. Police and many members of the public initially considered the possibility of Islamic terrorism due to similar incidents in the past involving Muslims, the targeting of a western festival, and the recent rise in Islamic terrorist activity, but police have now confirmed that this is not terrorism related. Similarly, there have been widespread links/controversy made between the rapper and his connections to BLM, and it has been linked to Rittenhouse whether you like it or not. It is part of the story. The killer is a major supporter and activist of BLM. And this happened in the aftermath of Rittenhouse's acquittal. It's all part of the background and developing story. OldPeace7068 (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not at all. The police have stated he was fleeing a separate scene. Conflating this with BLM/Rittenhouse is pure crystal balling. Thanks. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- "two black men" and you'd think we were on a website about facts... CharredWaffle (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not at all. The police have stated he was fleeing a separate scene. Conflating this with BLM/Rittenhouse is pure crystal balling. Thanks. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is there to report the facts. Police and many members of the public initially considered the possibility of Islamic terrorism due to similar incidents in the past involving Muslims, the targeting of a western festival, and the recent rise in Islamic terrorist activity, but police have now confirmed that this is not terrorism related. Similarly, there have been widespread links/controversy made between the rapper and his connections to BLM, and it has been linked to Rittenhouse whether you like it or not. It is part of the story. The killer is a major supporter and activist of BLM. And this happened in the aftermath of Rittenhouse's acquittal. It's all part of the background and developing story. OldPeace7068 (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Complete extrapolation. Police have said they believe he was on the run having committed a separate crime, nothing to do with Rittenhouse at all. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Calling this an "attack" may be a misnomer as it appears that the suspect was fleeing the police, not that it was a preplanned attack or terrorism. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe so. OTOH, at least one report quotes a witness as saying the vehicle seemed to be "targeting people" as it veered from side to side. Also, reports say it crashed through barriers to reach the parade, which seems to indicate that it was indeed an attack, though possibly not a pre-planned one. – Sca (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The blurb should (and currently does not) mention the country in which this event took place. Chrisclear (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's not at all clear that this is an act of terrorism, and thus not something that would be imminently notable.--WaltCip-(talk) 13:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose both on merit and article quality. As of this comment, the incident does not appear to have been a deliberate attack. I would be open to reconsideration if contrary information comes to light. Also, at present the article is little more than an oversized stub. It's not ready for the main page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Support... pending expansion of article, which presently comprises a mere 250 words, i.e. a stub. Seems to be the No. 1 story on main RS sites today. Note 40+ injuries. (Please spare me the de rigueur "U.S.-centric" harangue. This event is unusual and widely covered.) – Sca (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)- Oppose Not sure this deserves to be on the main page and the article doesn't look very good. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If the incident turns out not to be terrorist motivated, I honestly don't see it in Main Page, and if it's , with five dead, I 'mnot very clear, although the number of injured is dantesque. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- If this is confirmed as an unfortunate series of events with no purposeful motivating factor (driver escaping from knife fight and inadvertently ran through parade crowd), then I would agree this is not really something that should be posted. This doesn't mean motiveless events can't ever be posted but I would expect the results to be more devasting (like the various major building fires or collapses that we had). --Masem (t) 16:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Exactly, I think the same Masem. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- If this is confirmed as an unfortunate series of events with no purposeful motivating factor (driver escaping from knife fight and inadvertently ran through parade crowd), then I would agree this is not really something that should be posted. This doesn't mean motiveless events can't ever be posted but I would expect the results to be more devasting (like the various major building fires or collapses that we had). --Masem (t) 16:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait – As an AP update seems to suggest this was the act of a lone nutcase with a record, I've withdrawn my provisonal support. However, it seems we're still in a wait situation, since nine of the injured are listed in critical condition. If the toll were to rise to double digits, we might still want to consider a blurb about this very nasty event. – Sca (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support if the motivation turns out to be terrorism, neutral if otherwise. Mlb96 (talk) 19:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- A post – by an IT user with no other contributions – on our article's talk page posits racial motivation. Seems highly dubious at this point, though. – Sca (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- See WP:RS. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Please see expanded comment above. Thanks. – Sca (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- See WP:RS. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- A post – by an IT user with no other contributions – on our article's talk page posits racial motivation. Seems highly dubious at this point, though. – Sca (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support. This event is in the news and the article looks to be in good shape. -- Tavix (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: – Since perp's been ID'd & police say he'll face five counts of first-degree intentional homicide, this is looking potentially more significant. – Sca (talk) 20:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Per The Independent this guy had a domestic dispute, and drove his car like a lunatic. Not terror-related, just an idiot behind the wheel. Not significant, tragic, but will never make the top 1000 things that happened on Planet Earth in 2021, let alone the top 250. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - a mass-casualty event, receiving international coverage (e.g., BBC), a suspect is being charged, and the article has been improved to sufficient quality. Levivich 20:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - rare (even in the US) mass-casualty event. Article quality is decent. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 20:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment a road traffic accident in the US is not rare. Mass-casualty events in the US are far from rare. It's pretty obvious that giving this tragic yet non-terrorist/non-BLM/non-protest/non-deliberate accident undue prominence is not what the encyclopedia was designed to do. Of course, you can dig into the BBC website and find coverage, it's all "shock and think of the children" in the US, but the rest of the world has moved on the moment it was clear it was a sad instance of a crime somewhere else having shitty side-effects, and literally nothing more. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- The last time I remember a similar incident happened in the US was late 2017 when somebody plowed into a crowd in Virginia after a violent demonstration got broken up. We posted the event that it was tangentially related to, largely on the strength of somebody plowing their car into a crowd and killing someone. You supported posting it. Rockphed (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- If you're referring to Charlottesville car attack, that was about a man deliberately setting out to ram people. This is about a man trying to escape the scene of a domestic incident and getting into a road traffic accident. The two are incomparable. But good try. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- The last time I remember a similar incident happened in the US was late 2017 when somebody plowed into a crowd in Virginia after a violent demonstration got broken up. We posted the event that it was tangentially related to, largely on the strength of somebody plowing their car into a crowd and killing someone. You supported posting it. Rockphed (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Agreeing with previous posters, posting this event would seem to be giving undue weight to a tragic traffic accident. Comparison with the Charlottesville incident from several years back is unfair, given the explicitly political motivations of the earlier event. Wizardoftheyear (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral and Wait Yes, with the additional details that have come to light, this is literally a domestic issue that had decidedly more tragic consequences. However, that is additional details. The initial response, and the fact there were several fatalities during a celebration, caught on camera and shared around the world before anyone knew what was going on, has made this major news and a source of intrigue. I think we need to wait to see if the news stations drop their coverage now that there is less intrigue and crisis; if it has effectively left the news cycle by end of day, take this as an oppose, but if it is still on the news banners, take this as support. Kingsif (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- 4 of the 12 paragraphs in this article start "On November 2X". Typical anti-American bias from the Brits (which is far from rare) notwithstanding, the quality is not there yet. GreatCaesarsGhost 02:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - Tragic, criminally-induced mass-casualty. Significant details are now known. CoatCheck (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait It's very clear that there won't be consensus as is, but there may be more of one as things develop. Wait for now. DarkSide830 (talk) 03:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Strong Support. This is the deadliest vehicle ramming incident in the United States or Canada since 2018 and the deadliest in the US since 2017. 142.182.136.105 (talk) 07:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I see there's been a tragic bus crash in Bulgaria which has killed at least 45 people. It would be safe to presume that supporters of this accident would support the posting of the Bulgarian crash, right? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nominate an article on it so that I can assess the quality. Without knowing what we are posting on the main page, it is impossible for me to know if the article is appropriate. --Jayron32 12:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Four hours ago.... The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 13:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Of course. My incompetency continues to be my defining attribute and sole notable trait. Carry on. --Jayron32 13:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Four hours ago.... The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 13:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nominate an article on it so that I can assess the quality. Without knowing what we are posting on the main page, it is impossible for me to know if the article is appropriate. --Jayron32 12:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ha! – Sca (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- There's no need to laugh. You, Sca, among all people, are fully aware of my incompetence. --Jayron32 13:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ha! – Sca (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
CommentSupport – Still in the news. [4] It's a complicated story but a notable event, IMO. Leaning toward support, for all the diff that would make here. – Sca (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)- Support for multiple fatalities, high number of serious injuries, and widespread news coverage. Jehochman Talk 13:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose A tragic event, but it is not a mass-casualty event. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - We have support and oppose !votes that directly contradict each other in terms of the notability of this event. Some say this is very notable. Others say this is not at all notable. How is an admin supposed to derive consensus from this? --WaltCip-(talk) 15:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- By executive fiat. – Sca (talk) 15:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well most of the support votes are from Americans (of those who have userpages), and almost all of the opposes are from non-Americans. So I guess it'll be a coin toss on whether an American or non-American admin decides... Joseph2302 (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- How about one from a neutral country, say Liechtenstein? – Sca (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I voted to oppose as an American ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, you must be from Manchester, N.H., then. – Sca (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well most of the support votes are from Americans (of those who have userpages), and almost all of the opposes are from non-Americans. So I guess it'll be a coin toss on whether an American or non-American admin decides... Joseph2302 (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- By executive fiat. – Sca (talk) 15:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. This at first got attention because it might have been terrorism related, no problem there. But all we are left with now is an accident which leaves 5 death: while tragic, this is sadly an everyday occurrence. We have e.g. this week a ferry accident in Sri Lanka (at least 6 death)[5], 7 death in Greece when migrants flee the police[6], 22 deaths on Lake Kivu[7], nine deaths in a fire in Bulgaria[8], 10 deaths in China after a car crash[9], ... I see no reason to post this, as it is not exceptional, has no lasting importance, and isn't even very interesting (without the terrorism angle). It's a sad tragedy, but a very common one. Fram (talk) 17:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think it is WP:TOOSOON to make a determination as to whether this was an act of terror or not. Terrorism or not, the ramming appears to be deliberate, and it has made national and international headlines. Aasim (talk) 06:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per Fram, tragic, but not significant enough at a global scale: we don't even have articles about many similar tragedies elsewhere. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sad but ephemeral. Ericoides (talk) 07:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
(Pulled) 2021 Bulgarian general election (presidential second round)
Blurb: In Bulgaria, Rumen Radev (pictured) is re-elected President of Bulgaria. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Rumen Radev (pictured) is re-elected President of Bulgaria.
News source(s): Reuters, Aljazzera, Politico
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by BastianMAT (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Second round of the presidental election, ITNR (being part of the general elections), Radev has been declared winner with a landslide. BastianMAT (talk) 01:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Major election in an EU member state. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Question Do we post presidential elections even if the president has mostly symbolic roles? Scaramouche33 (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, heads of state elections are posted even if they are ceremonial/wield little power, it mostly depends on the article quality itself which should be more than sufficient. Two examples are the Italian presidental election and Czech presidental election, both having similar powers to the Bulgarian one. [10] [11] BastianMAT (talk) 09:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Weak supportthis article has been on front page for a week already, but I guess the second round presidency vote means that it's ITN eligible again. Article looks to have been sufficiently updated about the presidential second round vote. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)- This is not ITNR. We no longer post all elections for head of state- we post the election/choosing of the official with actual executive power, according to List of current heads of state and government; in Bulgaria that is the PM, not the president. 331dot (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- In which case, I oppose this nomination, and it shouldn't have been tagged as ITNR. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- In fairness, it is a recent change that not everyone may be aware of. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, I thought going by older posts that head of state elections are still part of ITNR but if its been removed, no problem and thanks for the headsup for future nominations. BastianMAT (talk) 12:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I just saw this now. I must have missed the change or forgot about it. So my comment on other presidents is not relevant here. --Tone 17:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Exactly, that’s what got me confused to when I ITNR nominated this. In the past as you and I mentioned, similar head of state elections (with similar powers) such as Moldova(November 2020), Germany, Austria, Italy, Czech Republic have been posted. 331dot said the removal of ceremonial head of state elections from ITNR were ’recently’ done, so the change must have not been too long ago for us to not know that.BastianMAT (talk) 18:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I just saw this now. I must have missed the change or forgot about it. So my comment on other presidents is not relevant here. --Tone 17:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Blurb on MainPage was updated and moved up --PFHLai (talk) 13:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- PFHLai there wasn't consensus to do this update- the presidential election is not ITNR, and there was not consensus here that it's important enough for ITN. We should leave it where it is, so it can roll off soon, instead of moving it up so it'll stay on ITN for another week... Joseph2302 (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Post posting support If the election was stand-alone, we would probably post it. This is just the case where the general election were held together with the first round of presidential, so there is a single article. I don't see a problem. --Tone 14:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I doubt we would post this as a standalone item. He may be head of state, but he has no power. It's the Prime Minister of Bulgaria who would be posted automatically. — Amakuru (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- In fact he has been in de facto power since the 2021 April elections as he appointed his friend as acting prime minister. The de jure power he wields is similar to those in Italy and Czech Republic, where he gets to nominate the prime minister and supreme court judges, he can veto laws (although parliament can override) and he of course serves as head of state, don’t forget Bulgaria even has a vice president. In the past we have posted the Italian presidental and Czech Republic presidental elections, both are parliamantary republics too. I thought it was ITNR, but 331dot mentioned that head of state elections (where the head of state is not head of goverment) was recently removed from ITNR. Italian presidental election posted Czech Republic presidental election posted BastianMAT (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- (ec) As far as I remember we post both if the articles are ok. We've posted presidents of Austria and Germany, which have a similar role, for example. Furthermore, the president of Germany is elected by Bundestag, not by a popular vote. --Tone 17:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I doubt we would post this as a standalone item. He may be head of state, but he has no power. It's the Prime Minister of Bulgaria who would be posted automatically. — Amakuru (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pull update and Revert back to previous version per Joseph2302. This guy is just a figure head, and we already posted the main election result. There was no reason to have bumped this up, and the result is not ITN/R so needs consensus, which it doesn't have. — Amakuru (talk) 17:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pull update and agree with above, not seeing consensus here for this to have even been posted in the first instance. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Beyond the issue of whether it should be on the main page, the blurb is clumsy. "In Bulgaria," is redundant. Where else but in Bulgaria would you be elected President of Bulgaria? Schwede66 17:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Restored old blurb. --PFHLai (talk) 18:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose pull Not a head of state change but in the same spirit This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I think we need some kind of page break to restart voting. A lot of the opposition above was to the unilateral action and not the nom itself. as for me,
- Oppose while there are some states with significant power invested in the secondary office, this is not one of them. GreatCaesarsGhost 21:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't particularly mind about the unilateral action myself - it was made in good faith - and my oppose is purely on the merits of the case, for much the same reasons as you. I suggest we move on from this. — Amakuru (talk) 10:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
November 21
November 21, 2021
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
(Posted) RD: Gurmeet Bawa
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hindustan Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Itar buttar (talk · give credit), Kzkzb (talk · give credit) and Ktin (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Indian folks singer. Article can do with some minor expansion, but, is almost there. Edits and basic content expansion done. Meets hygiene expectations for homepage / RD. Ktin (talk) 02:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Weak opposeNeeds expansion regarding career/music style and some copyediting. Article has info in the introduction that is not found in the body. SpencerT•C 23:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Spencer. I had a chance to work on the article this morning. Meets basic hygiene expectations. Have a look at your leisure. Ktin (talk) 18:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- 'Support Looks good, meets minimum standards. SpencerT•C 22:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 00:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) Sudan political agreement
Blurb: Abdalla Hamdok (pictured) is reinstated as Prime Minister of Sudan. (Post)
Alternative blurb: In the aftermath of October 2021 Sudanese coup d'état, a political agreement is reached reinstating Abdalla Hamdok (pictured) as Prime Minister of Sudan.
Alternative blurb II: Abdalla Hamdok (pictured) is reinstated as Prime Minister of Sudan as part of a political agreement.
News source(s): Aljazzera, Reuters NYTimes DW News AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by BastianMAT (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: ITNR, as it falls under "Changes in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government, in those countries which qualify under the criteria above, as listed at List of current heads of state and government except when that change was already posted as part of a general election". Feel free to add another blurb if there is any better way to announce the reinstation. BastianMAT (talk) 14:05, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support However, I do think that the October 2021 Sudanese coup d'état should be mentioned in the blurb. Scaramouche33 (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a major omission to not include it. Jim Michael (talk) 16:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, I updated altblurb 1. Hope that works.BastianMAT (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a major omission to not include it. Jim Michael (talk) 16:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support article looks okay, changes to head of state are ITNR. Joseph2302 ( with no details about the new agreementtalk) 20:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support a positive development, and certainly news after the coup. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 00:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Post-posting comment The PM is released, probably with his powers curtailed. There are parallels to the 1991 coup in Togo. Joofjoof (talk) 02:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) 2021 World Rally Championship
Blurb: In rallying, Sébastien Ogier and Julien Ingrassia win the 2021 World Rally Championship, while Toyota secure the manufacturers' title. (Post)
News source(s): WRC.com, Autosport
Credits:
- Nominated by Unnamelessness (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Congrats on their 8th world titles; will update asap. Unnamelessness (talk) 12:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - it's a global prestige sporting championship and this article is very well presented and detailed. --PushingPace (talk) 15:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support article looks more than good enough, and event is ITNR. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
November 20
November 20, 2021
(Saturday)
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: David Longdon
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.loudersound.com/news/big-big-train-singer-david-longdon-dead-at-56
Credits:
- Nominated by Floydian (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Multi-instrumentalist and singer of British progressive rock band Big Big Train Pretty low key name, so article is pretty short. Floydian τ ¢ 16:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose more reliable sources needed. The entire Discography section is sourced to Discogs, which according to our article on it is a crowdsourced database i.e. not a RS. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Although I find it odd that we can reference a book but not a CD gatefold, I've found sources for the entire discography and added them. - Floydian τ ¢ 22:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
November 19
November 19, 2021
(Friday)
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Cedric Robinson (guide)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Guardian (UK)
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
- Updated by PamD (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: British guide. Found this article in good shape. RIP. Ktin (talk) 02:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Long enough and with footnotes at expected spots, this wikibio is READY for RD. Good find, Ktin. --PFHLai (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 05:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) Disappearance of Peng Shuai
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Chinese tennis player Peng Shuai disappears after accusing a former Chinese Vice Premier of sexual assault. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Chinese tennis player Peng Shuai is reported missing after accusing former Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli of sexual assault.
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Blythwood (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Support - Article is in good condition and the news is prominent, exceptional, and of great public interest around the world. Jehochman Talk 22:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - Article appear in news, but headlines on CBC, CNN, BBC are still focused on Rittenhouse Trial for now, although this may change. Otherwise, the blurb should describe whats happening now (the reactions), that she has not been publicly heard is not ITN as that is a few days old. 99.247.176.90 (talk) 23:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - I fail to see how this is any more worthy of ITN than the Rittenhouse trial, which was also not worthy of ITN. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 23:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Please don't oppose because you think another nomination should be posted and you don't think this one is as worthy. Judge nomination on its own merit. The two are about completely different things. -- KTC (talk) 23:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think either are worthy of being posted. --RockstoneSend me a message! 01:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Please don't oppose because you think another nomination should be posted and you don't think this one is as worthy. Judge nomination on its own merit. The two are about completely different things. -- KTC (talk) 23:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Jehochman. However I'm not quite sure about the term "disappears" here, even if I personally think the Chinese state did exactly that. -- KTC (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Jehochman. -- Tavix (talk) 23:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support this is far more notable than "another white American kills black Americans" and regardless of the fact that headlines are currently obsessing over the US proclivity to allow kids to routinely assassinate people without any kind of criminal conviction, Peng's disappearance is genuinely newsworthy and encyclopedic. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 23:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not that it matters to this nomination, but Rittenhouse's victims were white. GreatCaesarsGhost 00:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- *cough cough* Rittenhouse's victims were white *cough cough* – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Who said he wasn't talking about Young Dolph's routine assassin? We don't know he wasn't white. We don't know if he had other black American victims. Memphis is all about unsolved mysteries! AGF. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality The article needs a lot of work, as there are multiple sections with no inline citations.Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support While this might be unduly implicative of the Chinese state being connected, if RSs are making that connection this definitely belongs. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality I would support this if the article has some ref work done. There's sections that are unsourced. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 00:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose this is newsworthy for sure but blurbing that someone "disappeared" after making an accusation seems like a WP:BLPCRIME issue to me. --LaserLegs (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Completely agree it's an awkward thing to summarise in a way that fits BLP while keeping it clear why the event is notable, I'd welcome suggestions for alternative phrasing. I realise this is a fairly limited action, but for that reason I deliberately didn't link to the person she accused in the proposed blurb. Blythwood (talk) 01:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as per LaserLegs, there's something wrong about posting speculation that someone disappeared straight after they made accusations. With little reliable information, this seems like a BLP issue to post it. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Far too speculative, with overtones of anti-China sentiment, and with too many unknowns. Needs far more clarification before it is posted. And a guarantee that ITN will publish a full We Were Wrong! statement and retraction on the Main page when it is found out she has just eloped with her boyfriend or girlfriend, as the case may be. HiLo48 (talk) 01:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Clearly if China "disappeared" her, that would be a story, but this appears to be Western nations making a demand of China and there's no hard evidence she has been killed or imprisoned or the like. We don't post this type of speculative stories. --Masem (t) 02:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per wide coverage in RSes. Normchou 💬 03:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose unless the incident has a separate article. Sun8908 Talk 07:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support — article looks decent enough for ITN standards by my eye, wide coverage in RSes. If the choice of "disappears" is undesirable, then "is reported missing" might be a potential alternative (posted as altblurb). [osunpokeh/talk/contributions] 08:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think that suggests she was reported missing in the police report sense, not that Novak Djokovic described her as "a missing person" to reporters. Not a bad idea. Just a bit ambiguous. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support, in the news, top page news in many countries. The issue is she has suddenly disappeared after accusing a senior cabinet minister of a serious crime, and the involved parties are public figures indept of this incident, so there is nothing wrong as long as it is sourced and not stated as truth. Peng's disappearance and the resulting sports diplomacy pressure and boycott threats are sufficient Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Have you ever studied the difference between correlation and causation? HiLo48 (talk) 21:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I have and I wonder if it's possible to have a maths competition over Wikipedia lol. I never said there was a causation, although I am sure many on Wikipedia have noted your hard-left POV eg trying to get all right of centre Australian newspapers struck off at RSN. Bumbubookworm (talk) 22:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Have you ever studied the difference between correlation and causation? HiLo48 (talk) 21:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- I am adding sources to the career section Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Masem, Joseph2302. Something that may have happened isn't blurbworthy, no matter how widely it's hyped. – Sca (talk) 13:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per Masem, Sca. It could be the start of something noteworthy, or it could be nothing. We can post when it turns out to be something noteworthy if it does. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - Do we post news around here anymore? Sometimes I do wonder.--WaltCip-(talk) 18:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support highly notable, good article. Polyamorph (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per above. The article has unref'd sections about her tennis career, but the linked section is ready. Davey2116 (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. We shouldn't (and don't) post articles with multiple unsourced sections. The fact that the section linked in bold is referenced is irrelevant. Black Kite (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait Let's wait until we are 100% sure what has happened to her. Heythereimaguy (talk) 23:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Global Times continues to point to her, this time at a restaurant with a coach and friends, seemingly quite visible. Western speculation now turns to whether she's safe, though, or free from external interference or to be believed. All very personal and hard-to-answer questions, for anybody anywhere. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose it's just one person in a world where much worse things happen in other places like Ethiopia. Banedon (talk) 01:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. Videos of Peng Shuai have supposedly surfaced. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 03:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support However, I propose removing the term 'Chinese' in front of Peng Shuai. It does not add to her character or her identity as a professional tennis player. Something along the lines of "Professional tennis player Peng Shuai disappears after accusing former Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli of sexual assault." would be better imo. However, we should also note the videos posted by Global Times editors (primarily those tweeted by editor-in-chief Hu Xijin) and their aftermath. JMonkey2006 (talk) 11:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment – She's reappeared, online at least. End of story? – Sca (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Wide coverage by RSes and notable. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 14:05, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Still too murky and speculative, with little general impact. – Sca (talk) 15:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Leaving aside anything else, there is video evidence of her out and about so she hasn't been "disappeared" and isn't "missing". Whether or not something else is happening is in the realm of speculation, and would require a separate blurb. Also, very large swathes of the article on her career lack even a single citation. Is it not time to close this as no consensus already?
- Preceding posted by User:BSMRD – Sca (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: – Discussion tops 1,500 words. Posts running 4:3 against. – Sca (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment as nominator I'm willing to close soon now there's video of her alive (barring any big development, like it rapidly emerging this is an impersonator). Someone being in big trouble with their government isn't ITN-worthy, although I still think someone being forced-disappeared could be. Blythwood (talk) 19:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) Kyle Rittenhouse verdict
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: After shooting three people and killing two amidst protests surrounding the Shooting of Jacob Blake, Kyle Rittenhouse is found not guilty on all charges. (Post)
News source(s): New York Times, CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by Andise1 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Support article is comprehensive, updated, and well-referenced. A few WP:PROSELINE-issues, but not enough to downgrade the quality too much. Topic has been, and is being covered extensively by quality, reliable news sources in a way that would indicate this is a significant story. Checks all of the boxes for me. --Jayron32 18:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose to international notability. It won’t be listed on 2021 per previous discussions of it not having international notability. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Elijahandskip, #Please do not...
oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive.
– Muboshgu (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC) - (edit conflict):*See the instructions above "Please do not...oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive." "International notability" is not a criteria for posting at ITN, nor has it ever been. --Jayron32 19:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Elijahandskip, #Please do not...
- Well my direct opinion is that it is not notable. My reasoning is the discussion that already took place on the 2021 talk page. I also have previous discussions months ago where things highly notable to one country aren’t included. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a discussion of the page 2021. The criteria established for other parts of Wikipedia don't apply here. If you wish to change the criteria used for the ITN box, then start a discussion at WT:ITN. Votes without valid rationales are given little weight. It's fine if you have a useful rationale, but merely "I don't think it's notable enough" does not provide any useful guidance to admins when deciding consensus. I mean, you're allowed to say any silly thing you want, I suppose, but you can't expect anyone to take you seriously if it isn't valid. --Jayron32 19:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well since you don’t like my reasoning, just let me say “no”. People have supported ITN’s in the past without giving a reason, so my “Oppose” in this case will not have a reason. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- As I said, it's a free world. People do nonsensical things all of the time. --Jayron32 19:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, I couldn’t agree more. In reality, my oppose on this comes more to combat American Wikipedia vs English Wikipedia. There is a essay on Wikipedia that I recently read that has that meaning. Not everything that happens in America is notable for Wikipedia/2021/ITN/Portal Current Events, etc….Elijahandskip (talk) 19:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- As I said, it's a free world. People do nonsensical things all of the time. --Jayron32 19:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well since you don’t like my reasoning, just let me say “no”. People have supported ITN’s in the past without giving a reason, so my “Oppose” in this case will not have a reason. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose (at least on news of just the verdict). It was a highly watched case in the U.S., but it was clear early on to many legal experts that are crying foul on judicial behavior. It is very very likely to see an appeal and so this is not the end. This is not like the result from the very public George Floyd protests (which we posted and had ongoing about those, and the verdict). That said, there had been concerns there may be rioting following an acquittal , and while I'm not seeing any immediate news on that, a major riot (akin to the LA riots after King's verdict) would likely be the newsworthy factor here. --Masem (t) 19:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- There literally cannot be any appeal of a not guilty verdict. This is a core principle of how double jeopardy is handled in American jurisprudence. A not guilty jury verdict is basically always final. See [12]. There are some exceedingly rare exceptions to this, but none of them would apply in this case. An ordinary jury verdict of "not guilty" like this one (even in a controversial trial) is treated as basically sacrosanct, and there can be no appeals by the government. --Jayron32 19:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Except for the calls for a mistrial that are being entered now. I know there's complexities with double jeopardy there, but that's still on the books and that itself can be a legal process. --Masem (t) 19:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Um, what? There were calls for a mistrial by Rittenhouse's defense team prior to the jury verdict coming back. Now that the verdict is in their client's favor, I doubt highly they will press forward with these requests. Indeed, articles such as this one note "The verdict also meant that Judge Bruce Schroeder did not have to rule on the defense's motions for a mistrial." --Jayron32 19:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Except for the calls for a mistrial that are being entered now. I know there's complexities with double jeopardy there, but that's still on the books and that itself can be a legal process. --Masem (t) 19:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- There literally cannot be any appeal of a not guilty verdict. This is a core principle of how double jeopardy is handled in American jurisprudence. A not guilty jury verdict is basically always final. See [12]. There are some exceedingly rare exceptions to this, but none of them would apply in this case. An ordinary jury verdict of "not guilty" like this one (even in a controversial trial) is treated as basically sacrosanct, and there can be no appeals by the government. --Jayron32 19:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as above. If we had to have an American court psychodrama today, the better option from a world-historical perspective would probably be the acquittal of the purported killers of Malcolm X. —Brigade Piron (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose AGF, but this is such a small story in the grand scheme. GreatCaesarsGhost 19:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait. It is too early to tell what impact this will have. It could be a Rodney King-like result where acquittal of the accused leads to broad social unrest, or it could pass with a shrug. I expect that we will know within 24 hours. BD2412 T 19:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose and close US-centric nomination, not important enough for ITN. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose and renominate once the riots get into full swing. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Far from blurb-worthy, lack of deep international coverage and interest. U.S-centric. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Very US centric. It's probably not even the most important news in the US right now, let alone the world. I agree with Piron above that the clearing of Malcom X's killers is more noteworthy in the grand scheme. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- It is the most important US news event ongoing right now. Every major US news outlet is covering the story and many have been broadcasting portions of the trial for the past several days.XavierGreen (talk) 20:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support certainty an extremely notable event.XavierGreen (talk) 20:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Actually not even sure this is going to be more than a couple days' news in the US. —valereee (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Trial of a decade, widely reported across the world. Even my local news station in Russia reported on the topic. The only reason this is leaning oppose is because the verdict contradicts the biases of the local editors. 5.44.170.26 (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Feels like there's a "Trial of the Decade" going on every other year lately... DarkSide830 (talk) 21:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Edgardo Labella
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Cebu Daily News
Credits:
- Nominated by ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk · give credit)
- Created by Emperork (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jollibinay (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former Mayor of Cebu City. Article looks decent but could warrant some improvements ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 15:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Seems ready. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 16:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
2020–2021 Indian farmers' protest
Blurb: Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India announces the repeal of 3 farm laws which led to mass protests. (Post)
News source(s): AP, WSJ
Credits:
- Nominated by Indefensible (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Dracophyllum (talk · give credit) and DiplomatTesterMan (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: This article was previously in ongoing, now has a noteworthy update which should bring it towards conclusion. - Indefensible (talk) 06:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: One of the major farmers' unions behind the protests, Bharatiya Kisan Union, has promised to continue protesting till the laws are actually repealed (source). I wonder if we should put this blurb up now, or when Parliament repeals them and the farmers go home (don't have strong opinions either way, but I lean towards waiting). If we're going to put it up now, I've uploaded this screengrab of Modi's announcement from his CC-BY YouTube channel; we could use it. Btw Indefensible - Dracophyllum was the only updater, not DiplomatTesterMan. Kind regards, W. Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/c) 07:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Using the update to put back in ongoing instead of a final blurb would be fine too if preferable. And DiplomatTesterMan did more updates on the article before that, he still deserves some credit too I think. - Indefensible (talk) 07:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose because the article is not sufficiently updated. There is currently a 1 sentence mention in the lead of the repeal of the laws, and no mention of it, nor of any follow-on protests, anywhere in the body of the article. Before this can be posted, the latest developments would need to be added to the article appropriately. --Jayron32 12:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Jayron32 Have you read the repeal section? Dracophyllum 20:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Your response is 8 hours after Jayron32's, Dracophyllum. The section may have not existed when Jayron commented. But then again, I am not going to take the time to check if it did exist at 12:18 PM UTC on 19 Nov 2021. Tube·of·Light 02:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Jayron32 Have you read the repeal section? Dracophyllum 20:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: The announcement by itself has no legal value. Parliament has to repeal the laws, which it will probably do in the coming Winter Session. Also some farmer's unions are continuing protests until the laws are repealed and minimum support prices reconsidered. So it might be better to wait, but no strong opinion either way. --Jose Mathew (talk) 12:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wait and see what the impact of this is. Right now, there isn't enough information on what will happen as a result of this. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose --LaserLegs (talk) 22:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- to international notability. It won’t be listed on 2021 per previous discussions of it not having international notability.
- India-centric nomination, not important enough for ITN
- and renominate once the riots get into full swing.
- per above. Far from blurb-worthy, lack of deep international coverage and interest. India-centric
- Very India centric. It's probably not even the most important news in India right now, let alone the world.
- Actually not even sure this is going to be more than a couple days' news in India
- "Please do not oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive." 331dot (talk) 23:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's important to remember that 1/7 of the people on this planet are Indians. We don’t post a great deal of India related stories. 331dot (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Interestingly I didn't see the same PDM feedback from you above for another "country-centric" nomination from the worlds third most populous country. In fact, we do post many India-centric stories here, this one having festered in ongoing for nearly a year. --LaserLegs (talk) 23:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Invariably it is announcements that get more attention than the actual act, most of the time(we post elections when the result is known, not when the results are official/certified). If Modi renegs, that will likely be newsworthy itself. 331dot (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - as Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI says, the BKU is still protesting. I would prefer waiting till the laws are actually repealed (and FWIW, these laws are being repealed just before the 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly elections and elections in some other states, which are crucial for Modi's political party). Tube·of·Light 02:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – On article quality – and as others have noted because the laws haven't taken effect. The article, at more than 10,000 words, is grossly overwritten, overblown and overweight – presumably by partisans who view the topic as a cause célèbre that calls for a crusade. – Sca (talk) 13:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) November 2021 lunar eclipse
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The longest partial lunar eclipse in 580 years occurs. (Post)
News source(s): CNN, NBC News, NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by Davey2116 (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
- Oppose – I didn't see it. – Sca (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC) ... ;-)
- Yeah. We always seem to post eclipses well after they conclude, with the snarky undertone of "and, ha ha ha, you missed it!". —Cryptic 13:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Why THIS MUCH INDENT? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah. We always seem to post eclipses well after they conclude, with the snarky undertone of "and, ha ha ha, you missed it!". —Cryptic 13:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – I didn't see it. – Sca (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC) ... ;-)
- Oppose on quality the visibility section is two unsourced paragraphs, would need a lot more sourced information about the event (rather than just an endless list of "Related eclipses"). Joseph2302 (talk) 13:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think we post lunar eclipses, and as Cryptic noted posting them after they're over seems very useless to readers. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Maybe we'll post the next one in 500+ years. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose lunar eclipses are even less interesting than manned spaceflights. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're forgetting that lunar eclipses often presage globally cataclysmic events, such as permanent cancellation of The Boat Race, which I fear may now be in the offing for 2022. – Sca (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, lunar eclipses and the Boat Race are entirely unrelated. And of course, there will be no "permanent cancellation of The Boat Race", that's total bollocks, but perhaps inline with your regular contributions. As you perhaps should know already, The Boat Race 2022 is scheduled for next year, and if COVID stymies it, one imagines it will simply be moved to the River Great Ouse once again. I'm unclear as to where you think that a lunar eclipse would be a portent for the permanent cancellation of an event which has been conducted since 1829, even before the Third Reich failed to play nicely. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ease up, Ramblo, it was a joke. (And BTW, the Third Reich and this topic are entirely unrelated.) – Sca (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, and this topic and the Boat Race are completely unrelated. And it wasn't funny in any sense. So explain yourself. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:45, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ease up, Ramblo, it was a joke. (And BTW, the Third Reich and this topic are entirely unrelated.) – Sca (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, lunar eclipses and the Boat Race are entirely unrelated. And of course, there will be no "permanent cancellation of The Boat Race", that's total bollocks, but perhaps inline with your regular contributions. As you perhaps should know already, The Boat Race 2022 is scheduled for next year, and if COVID stymies it, one imagines it will simply be moved to the River Great Ouse once again. I'm unclear as to where you think that a lunar eclipse would be a portent for the permanent cancellation of an event which has been conducted since 1829, even before the Third Reich failed to play nicely. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're forgetting that lunar eclipses often presage globally cataclysmic events, such as permanent cancellation of The Boat Race, which I fear may now be in the offing for 2022. – Sca (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support, this lunar eclipse has gotten significant news coverage. Both visibility paragraphs each have a single reference at the end. -- Tavix (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
November 18
November 18, 2021
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Peter Buck (restaurateur)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN, Independent
Credits:
- Updated by UConnHusky7 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American nuclear physicist and co-founder of the Subway fast-food restaurant chain. --PFHLai (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support looks good enough for RD. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support article is ready. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 11:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 23:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
RD: Jimmie Durham
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [13]
Credits:
- Nominated by ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk · give credit)
- Created by Infoart (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Strattonsmith (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American sculptor, essayist and poet. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Needs more citations. SpencerT•C 21:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- There are still a handful of {cn} tags that need to be addressed. Please add more refs to this wikibio. --PFHLai (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
References
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: