Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Taft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evelyn Taft

Object to the contention that WP:GNG has incurred any violation due to the presence of this article. Neither of the unique reference sources were self-generated, and her distinguished background and achievement of chief meteorologist while in her 20's is noteworthy to those interested in a similar career path.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local meteorologist, albeit in a major market, that doesn't have widespread notability necessary. Shadowjams (talk) 01:29, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 07:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but some of the other news anchors at the same TV station have their own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindsapw (talk • contribs) 14:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Of the four provided references, two are not independent of the subject (being from the subject's employer and alma mater) and the other two don't even mention the subject. I was not able to find anything else besides many mentions in "weather babe" blogs which are neither reliable nor significant. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

"The article will be reinstated. She is noteworthy because she is seen by thousands of people every day, and, as pointed out, her position is unique for someone her age.