User talk:Gianluigi02

Welcome!

Hello, Gianluigi02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to List of terrorist incidents in August 2016. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vítor (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of terrorist incidents in October 2016 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Iraqi Civil War and Islamic State

List of terrorist incidents in September 2016 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Islamic State

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Parsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of terrorist incidents in July 2016 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Parsley Man (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in October 2016, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. No sources for these being terrorist attacks, and we would need official sources, not just newspapers Doug Weller talk 16:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in July 2016. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Parsley Man (talk) 00:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to German consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif attack. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Your edit[1] made the infobox & text contradictory. If the deaths change, please provide a reliable source. 220 of ^Borg 12:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to German consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif attack does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 12:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gianluigi02. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in December 2016. Psychonaut (talk) 20:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at 2016 Berlin attack, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Mr X 21:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2016 Grand-Bassam shootings page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you accept my request without that understand me wrong

You are fluent in the Italian language for that in my opinion, be amended 2017 Istanbul nightclub attack page in Italian because there are some errors in the numbers of victims. Yazan Kanbar (talk) 12:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, now I modify the Italian Page.Gianluigi02

List of terrorist incidents

I notice you are doing some edits on the January 2017 article recently, but are not using the proper referencing. Please see the talk page discussion on that article, which includes an easy and short template that you can use for the references. I personally fixed all of them yesterday, and now I see new incidents are being added without the right referencing, so please take a moment to read the talk section, and use the proper tags in the future. Thanks! Skycycle (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am posting this again - you continue to use poor English, poor referencing, and poor attribution while editing the article. Please respond to this, because the next step will be to either up the protection of the article, or request a block for your account. Skycycle (talk) 15:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2017 Marseille melee attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Marseille melee attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Marseille melee attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. st 170e 14:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Insurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2016 Ouagadougou attacks into Insurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Gianluigi02, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Operation Ghazi have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. sami ^talk 18:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of terrorist incidents

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in March 2017. Please add proper references, and do not add incidents that involve civilians (for example Israel/Palestine stabbing attack), or incidents that are part of a military operation. Skycycle (talk) 15:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alleged al-Qaeda recruits

A tag has been placed on Category:Alleged al-Qaeda recruits requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 14:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving you one final warning before a block. Each terrorist incident you add must be accompanied by reliable sources which explicitly labels the event as terrorism. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: the edits continue. [2] [3] EvergreenFir (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents in April 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in June 2017. Uncle Roy (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]