User talk:Berberu

April 2018

Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 05:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 13:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't make sense Jingiby. When I find more time will come with better solutions to replace your mean behaviour with more productive people/content. You are wasting my time & removing valuable info for wider community.

Sorry, that was a mistake. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring - Nikolaus Dumba

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; according to the reverts you have made on Nikolaus Dumba; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please stop it or open a thread to the talk page, bring reliable and secondary sources in order to justify your edits. Othon I (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Othon I (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I'm particularly disturbed by your changing a cited statement that he was "Greek" to "Aromanian". If the citation said he was Greek, you're hoaxing by claiming that it said something it didn't. Yet you didn't say anything about the cited source's reliability or otherwise challenge it (or say that it had been misinterpreted): you're giving the impression of someone who places his preferred text in a place, regardless of what the source says. Combine that problem with edit-warring beyond our three-revert rule, and you are blocked. Nyttend (talk) 23:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]