Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Doggart

Sebastian Doggart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor and filmmaker that seem to be using this page as a promotional piece. jps (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a poorly-written, badly-sourced puff-piece of a WP:BLP. It needs to be completely re-written to stay in Wikipedia but the subject does seem to be notable. I have no desire to re-write it but I disagree that it should be deleted. Shearonink (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm having a hard time identifying the sources which indicate this person is notable. Sometimes WP:TNT is appropriate. This may be such a case. jps (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak KeepDoes seem to be notable, but the article is way over long for such a minor celebrity.Slatersteven (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Strong KeepDoes seem to be notable, with 64 verified sources cited. CitizenKane7 (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC) Struck per WP:SOCK and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oxford2008.[reply]

— CitizenKane7 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. jps (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read wp:overcite, its quality not quantity that matters, and blogs are not RS.Slatersteven (talk) 20:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Bromance, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courting Condi, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Faust: From Condi to Neo-Condi. jps (talk) 19:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, along with the three associated articles. Had promotion been an undue concern, then Nike Doggart (Sebastian's sister, a biologist in Africa, after whom a species is named) might have been noted. Nike Doggart is another article at AfD, nominated by jps, but not mentioned here or at the current AfDs for American Faust: From Condi to Neo-Condi, Courting Condi, or True Bromance, also by jps. Anarchangel (talk) 01:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is your contention that promotion is not a concern because I did not mention Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike Doggart here or at the articles about SD's films? I also nominated a number of other BLPs that were created by the sockfarm of people who worked on the films, but did not mention them here in order to keep discussions contained. I really do not follow what your argument is here. jps (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2nd and 3rd sentences are different arguments. Anarchangel (talk) 01:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could spell them out and explain how they conform to Wikipedia's WP:Deletion policy because I cannot understand what you are trying to say. jps (talk) 15:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I trust that the closer can comprehend my arguments. Containment is not Deletion policy. Noting that similar articles have been nominated is. Anarchangel (talk) 02:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In my opinion, he does pass notability standards, but the article needs to be worked on, with non-reliable sources (like links to Facebook) deleted. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]