Talk:Archaeology of Armenia

Armenia Mid‑importance

	Archaeology of Armenia is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archaeology in Armenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060811135348/http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk:80/pavel.dolukhanov/armenia/index.htm to http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/pavel.dolukhanov/armenia/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was no merge. TRL (talk) 01:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A recently created article at archaeological heritage of Armenia duplicates this one. There's no semantic difference between the "archaeology of" and "archaeological heritage of" a single country. Archaeology of Armenia is the better title per WP:CONCISE and because we have lots of Archaeology of... articles but no other Archaeological heritage of... articles.

Pinging Clarityfiend who suggested this at AfD and Klbrain who objected to the merge tag. – Joe (talk) 08:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe:: There were multiple keeps at the AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archaeological heritage of Armenia), which is why I argue that the case isn't obvious and why, 4 months ago, you should have made a case. You're also biasing the discussion by pinging the one person who said merge, and not those who would prefer a keep. Having said that, I agree that there are problems to solve. I wonder whether the content at Archaeological heritage of Armenia might be better merged to Prehistoric Armenia. Klbrain (talk) 09:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The two keep votes were made before a merge was suggested, and the discussion was closed early with the explicit instruction that the merge proposal can be further discussed in the article's talk page. I don't see this as a controversial suggestion, so I didn't see the need to ping the whole world about it, but happy to @TheLonelyPather, Orchastrattor, Chiswick Chap, Archives908, and CycloneYoris: as the other participants in the AfD, if that's what you prefer.

Prehistoric Armenia isn't a good merge target because the majority of the content of Archaeological heritage of Armenia (from #Armenia in the Early Bronze Age (3500-2400 BC) down) concerns historic periods. – Joe (talk) 09:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personally speaking, I still wish to have Archaeological heritage of Armenia deleted, but I respect the consensus shown by the community, and I will not push for another round of AfD.

I don't see it very possible to merge "Archaeological heritage of Armenia " into "Archaeology of Armenia": we have hundreds of words followed by only one citation. How much can we be sure that the information in the article is directly from the source, not some OR stuff? With that in mind, it is hard to pick out useful information from this article and insert them into Archaeology of Armenia.

I should've pushed for CSD A10. Anyways, happy new year to you all. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

merge proposal

if the preceding merge proposal was ambiguous, hopefully this one won't be. Armenian archaeology has existed since 2015 and only been edited 32 times in 9 years. the scope is exactly the same as this article, and the quality is significantly worse. practically speaking, this won't be too difficult of a merge, since the majority of the article is unsourced and what's cited can be transferred to this article. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 16:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above, and thanks for bringing this back up. I'm really don't know why the above discussion was closed – there's no substantial discussion of the merge itself, just procedural issues, and usually there's no time limit on merge proposals. – Joe (talk) 09:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i agree; i'll probably reopen that discussion at some point ... sawyer * he/they * talk 17:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright, since it's been a few months with no objections, i've mildly copyedited and merged what was sourced in the Armenian archaeology article. still not in amazing shape, but at least we now have 2 articles on the archaeology of Armenia instead of 3. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 10:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]