Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 December 13
December 13
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:
- Deleted byTijuana Brass. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:L 5ec7960a7d2eae0e26a6ac06c180937f.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Girlymegan (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic personal photo, only usage on a speedied article (Captain Ridiculous). Also, nondescriptive name. Master of Puppets Care to share? 00:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under Template:no source no license Corvus cornixtalk 00:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:
- Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Despite the copyright claims, which I have problems with anyway, this image has a logo on it that doesn't belong to the person who uploaded it and doesn't belong to Wikipedia. Corvus cornixtalk 00:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE SkierRMH (talk) 06:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Leo cat 1234567890.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikizeta4 (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE SkierRMH (talk) 06:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE SkierRMH (talk) 06:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:KM PROPERTIES - EL MATADOR TOWER with logo2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bessiesagario (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE SkierRMH (talk) 06:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Boywithastick.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Flipper344 (notify | contribs).
- unencyclopedic image, used only in a joke article that was speedily deleted Mayalld (talk) 08:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Arielle in 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marian-1011 (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE SkierRMH (talk) 09:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted as a clear WP:NFCC#8 violation. – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Lo_Piccolo_photofit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mafia_Expert (notify | contribs).
- WP:NFCC#3 violation. We are already using Image:Salvatore LoPiccolo.jpg to show what this (living but imprisoned) person looks like. A second image isn't necessary. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Image is discussed in the article itself because of the misfit of the photofit. This is already explained exhaustively at [[1]]. However, Quadell seems to be embarked on a campaign to remove this and the one below. I already requested Quadell to refrain from deleting thiese images and hand over the issue to another administrator. He refuses to discuss the arguments. - Mafia Expert (talk) 15:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete See my comment one nomination below. Garion96 (talk) 13:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: As I understand it, there's a short blurb on the article about the fact that the subject, when arrested, looked quite different from the police aged drawing. I believe that the images are fair use for illustrating this fact, but I'm skeptical as to whether this fact is encyclopedic as opposed to trivial. Kelvinc (talk) 06:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In my opinion, the veracity of the police sketch is not an important-enough factoid to warrant the inclusion of a non-free image, let alone two, especially since the allegation of inaccuracy is not sourced. Fails WP:NFCC#8. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Whether or not the blurb in the article about the mismatch of the photofit and the arrested subject is important needs to be discussed on Talk:Salvatore Lo Piccolo. Not here. It is in the article and consequently the images are needed to illustrate the issue. But Quadell of the Image Gestapo has his mind set on deleting the images anyway. Whatever sound arguments are put forward they will be ignored. - Mafia Expert (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Moreover, "the allegation of inaccuracy is not sourced" is yet another manipulation of facts. It is sourced in the section Arrest: "Officers remarked that Lo Piccolo’s face was entirely different from the identikit photo of him (see images on this page).[18] Lo Piccolo did not say word and just smiled when prosecutors noted that he did not ressemble the photofit released earlier this year.[19] The elder Lo Piccolo was in fact betrayed by his son of whome police did have a recent photograph.[20]" There are three sources !!! - Mafia Expert (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In my opinion, the veracity of the police sketch is not an important-enough factoid to warrant the inclusion of a non-free image, let alone two, especially since the allegation of inaccuracy is not sourced. Fails WP:NFCC#8. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: As I understand it, there's a short blurb on the article about the fact that the subject, when arrested, looked quite different from the police aged drawing. I believe that the images are fair use for illustrating this fact, but I'm skeptical as to whether this fact is encyclopedic as opposed to trivial. Kelvinc (talk) 06:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: See also discussion at Wikipedia:Fair use review#Image:Lo Piccolo photofit.jpg. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted as a clear WP:NFCC#8 violation. – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Lo_Piccolo_arrest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mafia_Expert (notify | contribs).
- WP:NFCC#3 violation. We are already using Image:Salvatore LoPiccolo.jpg to show what this (living but imprisoned) person looks like. A third image isn't necessary. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Image is discussed in the article itself because of the misfit of the photofit that is related to this image. This is already explained exhaustively at [[2]]. However, Quadell seems to be embarked on a campaign to remove this and the one above. I already requested Quadell to refrain from deleting thiese images and hand over the issue to another administrator. He refuses to discuss the arguments. - Mafia Expert (talk) 15:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Quadell and WP:NFCC#3. There is already a free image, no need to use a non-free content image here. Garion96 (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: see above. Kelvinc (talk) 06:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: the two images provide additional information discussed in the article that is not addressed by the free image. - Mafia Expert (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: see above. Kelvinc (talk) 06:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Kirk_Hinrich_Banner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KnowledgeOfSelf (notify | contribs).
- the focus of this image is the advertisement, making it a derivative of a copyrighted work Yonatan talk 15:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The image was taken from flickr.com and is released under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5, which is allowable on Wikipedia. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, sorry. Yes, the photo is cc-by-sa, but the ad is not. We could use the photo if we blacked out the ad, but then we wouldn't want to. It the U.S., Freedom of panorama does not cover ads (or other artworks) in public places. – Quadell (talk) (random) 12:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I suspect this is a copyvio. If not, I don't think it's useful. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Rippimp2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 24.181.122.133 (notify | contribs).
- Uncyclopedic and potential copyright violation bdesham ★ 18:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Tasc0 06:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:OKCSONICS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:OKCSONICS.JPG listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
- Orphan, almost certainly a non-free logo. --Mangostar (talk) 19:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:ErectPenis.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MattQadagio (notify | contribs).
- Wikimedia already has plenty of penis pictures. Uploader's ony contributions to the project have been to add his penis picture to various articles. This indicates the picture is mainly for the uploader's own vanity, and not the serious pursuit of the project. Futhermore, the license does not extend to third parties "This is a picture of my erect penis for use on any Wikimedia/Wikipedia project." making it unfree and incompatible with Wikipedia. -Nard 19:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, as well as the quality of the picture is so-so at best, there is too much stuff in background, and the angle used is just poor, not to mention, it doesn't conform to the use of no hands on the penis pictures in regards to displaying them, not to mention we haven't plenty of caucasian erect peni already we don't need anymore.Coldpower27 (talk) 02:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and emasculate. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: All images here deleted by Addhoc. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also:
- Image:BlueCoin.JPG
- Image:BlackCoin.JPG
- Image:GreenCoin.JPG
- Image:WhiteCoin.JPG
- Image:PinkCoin.JPG
- Image:YellowCoin.JPG
- Image:RedCoin.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Phoenix741 (notify | contribs).
- This was cut from an image that was deleted as a copyvio. This image is used on a userbox, which (I believe) would not qualify as fair use. Uploader claims its public domain, but that claim is invalid, Power Rangers are still owned by Disney. Mr Senseless (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The User box in general had another image that was marked for deletion and everything. Since the coin did not get marked also, one would assume that this image is ok. Also the image, from what I remember is from a picture of replicas not the original used my the TV series.Phoenix741(Talk Page) 21:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:MallorcaSpainB4x5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CJP_Staff (notify | contribs).
- I don't believe the uploader is the copyright-holder for this scan of a Spanish newspaper. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:ACMNomination4x5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CJP_Staff (notify | contribs).
- As above. And it's an orphan too. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:GRAMMYPR2wLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CJP_Staff (notify | contribs).
- As above – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- As above, one more time (with feeling) – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:
- Image:Nicest_Ass_Competition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ferdinand Porsche (notify | contribs).
- UE 86.129.18.121 (talk) 20:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep they are nice asses, plus the image is on Commons, not here. -Nard 21:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is on commons --B (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Kyrastas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KaragouniS (notify | contribs).
- News media photo of a deceased athlete. There is nothing iconic about this non-free image that would justify a claim of fair use. B (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:JJBorreli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KaragouniS (notify | contribs).
- News media photo of former soccer player, nothing iconic about it that would justify a claim of fair use B (talk) 21:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This image is a blatant copyright violation of http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/05/20/770_as_beit_hakidash_2_queens_lag_b.jpg . I had tagged it as a speedy deletion and the tag was removed by the uploader. Chocolatepizza (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Quadell. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Moshe rubashkin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lobojo (notify | contribs).
- There is no copyright tag on the Yiddish language wikipedia where this images was taken from. Uploader removed the no license tag after it was added to this image. Chocolatepizza (talk) 22:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.