Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
1 page
1 file
The authors who sign below expressly declare that: 1) We participated in the development of the investigation article ( ), short communication ( ), clinical case ( ), literature review ( ), as well as in the analysis of the data and writing of the above.
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Many factors, including professional and personal relationships and activities, can influence the design, conduct, and reporting of the clinical science that informs health care decision. The potential for conflict of interest exists when these relationships and activities may bias judgement. 1 Many stakeholders-editors, peer reviewers, clinicians, educators, policymakers, patients, and the public-rely on the disclosure of authors' relationships and activities to inform their assessments. Trust in the transparency, consistency, and completeness of these disclosures is essential. Ten years ago, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) adopted the "ICMJE Form for the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest" as a uniform mechanism for collecting and reporting authors' relationships and activities that readers might consider relevant to a published work. 2 The goal was to avoid the confusion (and often ensuing controversy) created when journals vary in how they collect and report this information. We believe a uniform disclosure form has been helpful, but problems remain. First, the software supporting the current form is increasingly problematic, making its use difficult or impossible for an increasing number of authors. More important, however, is that many authors and readers misunderstand, misapply, or misinterpret the disclosures.
ACADEMIC GOOGLE, ENCOLOMBIA.COM, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, DOAJ, PUBLINDEX, WORLD CAT and ACADEMIC.EDU. It receives original scientific articles about a variety of topics that keep relation with the health sciences, so much of basic as clinical application. These issues need to be inside knowledge area that could interest both undergraduate as postgraduate students, as well as professionals in the health area. The following recommendations should be considered. 1. Authorship. Each author must have contributed substantially to the successful development of the research process. According to international standards, the criteria that each author must meet are: • Substantial contributions to conception, design, data acquisition or analysis and data interpretation. • To write the article and to check it for intellectually important content. • Final approval of the version to be published. “Courtesy authors” identifications or designations will not be accepted if the researcher has not met the delineated criteria (e.g. head of school / department / research group that presents the paper). 2. Interest conflicts and funding. An author of an article to be considered may be involved in two types of interest conflicts. The first one relates directly to the work authors and the financial and personal relationships that could influence or bias the manuscript in some way. The second type of interest conflict is related to the financial backer of the research. The authors must admit and say when sending the paper if there is any interference or limitation of the financial backer with regard to the analysis and interpretation of the information, writing or manuscript submission. The existence or absence of interest conflicts must be specified at the end of the article. It must be also specified whether it has received money by way of funding, specifying the origins and codes of calls where they obtained the resources. If it is pertinent, immediately after, the acknowledgments to institutions or personnel that otherwise contributed to the article and / or the research, could be given. 3. Peer review policy. The originals will be subjected to a process of editorial review to be fulfilled in several phases. Initially the received items are subjected to a preliminary study by the director, editor or committee publisher who determines the appropriate structure of the paper and its relevance to the policies of the journal and the institution. If the article is accepted because it fulfills the formal and content requirements exposed in these instructions is sent to two external academic peers who anonymously made suggestions and corrections. Peer reviewers verdict is done as follows. (1) Publish unchanged. (2) Publish when they have complied with minor corrections. (3) Publish when substance and content corrections have been made. (4) Not publishable. In case of discrepancy in opinions it will be sent to a third arbitrator, if necessary opinion of the member of the scientific committee will be requested. Authors will be informed timeously of the different phases that are met in the process of editorial review. They will the external peer reviewers opinions and always anonymously. They will also be subject to evaluation per linguistic in Spanish and English. Upon approval publication will be notified immediately to the authors and certification will be issued. When available, proofs will be sent to the authors for evaluation and final approval.
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS REVISTA CIENCIAS BIOMEDICAS (Rev.cienc.biomed.) is included in: IMBIOMED, ACADEMIC GOOGLE, ENCOLOMBIA.COM, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, DOAJ, PUBLINDEX, WORLD CAT and ACADEMIC.EDU. It receives original scientific articles about a variety of topics that keep relation with the health sciences, so much of basic as clinical application. These issues need to be inside knowledge area that could interest both undergraduate as postgraduate students, as well as professionals in the health area. The following recommendations should be considered. 1. Authorship. Each author must have contributed substantially to the successful development of the research process. According to international standards, the criteria that each author must meet are: • Substantial contributions to conception, design, data acquisition or analysis and data interpretation. • To write the article and to check it for intellectually important content. • Final approval of the version to be published. “Courtesy authors” identifications or designations will not be accepted if the researcher has not met the delineated criteria (e.g. head of school / department / research group that presents the paper). 2. Interest conflicts and funding. An author of an article to be considered may be involved in two types of interest conflicts. The first one relates directly to the work authors and the financial and personal relationships that could influence or bias the manuscript in some way. The second type of interest conflict is related to the financial backer of the research. The authors must admit and say when sending the paper if there is any interference or limitation of the financial backer with regard to the analysis and interpretation of the information, writing or manuscript submission. The existence or absence of interest conflicts must be specified at the end of the article. It must be also specified whether it has received money by way of funding, specifying the origins and codes of calls where they obtained the resources. If it is pertinent, immediately after, the acknowledgments to institutions or personnel that otherwise contributed to the article and / or the research, could be given. 3. Peer review policy. The originals will be subjected to a process of editorial review to be fulfilled in several phases. Initially the received items are subjected to a preliminary study by the director, editor or committee publisher who determines the appropriate structure of the paper and its relevance to the policies of the journal and the institution. If the article is accepted because it fulfills the formal and content requirements exposed in these instructions is sent to two external academic peers who anonymously made suggestions and corrections. Peer reviewers verdict is done as follows. (1) Publish unchanged. (2) Publish when they have complied with minor corrections. (3) Publish when substance and content corrections have been made. (4) Not publishable. In case of discrepancy in opinions it will be sent to a third arbitrator, if necessary opinion of the member of the scientific committee will be requested. Authors will be informed timeously of the different phases that are met in the process of editorial review. They will the external peer reviewers opinions and always anonymously. They will also be subject to evaluation per linguistic in Spanish and English. Upon approval publication will be notified immediately to the authors and certification will be issued. When available, proofs will be sent to the authors for evaluation and final approval.
2008
Since its foundation in 1992, the Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) has followed the strict standards of quality in the scientific pub-lishing. However, the Journal has been aware that its specific posi-tion demands more than just following the already established rules. From the very beginning, the Journal declared an “author-help-ful policy, ” stating that “journal editors should have a major role in training authors in science communication, especially in smaller and developing scientific communities. Journal authors usually send sci-entifically acceptable but poorly prepared articles and it is a pity to lose valid data because of their poor presentation. ” (1,2). In brief, the editors and editorial staff of the CMJ have been well aware that the skills of scientific reporting and publishing in our aca-demic community are not developed and that valuable research re-sults and valid data are being lost because of poor presentation. To be perfectly honest, ten years ago this statement l...
Acta Med Indones, 2007
Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 2014
Recently there are several budding medical journals which are coming from developing countries and also there is a large number of publishers. It will foster medical research from these countries. Authors will improve the skill of medical writing because of these journals senior, experienced international/ national editorial and review board. Also this team is responsible for the quality of the journal. Journals primary aim should not be making money and get other benefit to the people who are dealing with it. Journals should produce evidence based new information to the medical science which will benefit to the new generation physicians, scientists and readers. There is a tremendous increase in the medical research articles in the recent years because most of the institutions, universities and funding agencies consider the publication history of the scientists for their promotion and incentive. It results with good practice and bad practice of research. There are several scientist...
http://ijnl.tums.ac.ir 6 July Aim and Scope Iranian Journal of Neurology INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS The submission file is in Microsoft Word document file format. The Iranian Journal of Neurology is dedicated to the Iranian Neurological Association. The journal is a peerreviewed journal published quarterly and publishes neurological experiences in basic or clinical fields in English Language. The Iranian Journal of Neurology aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental works or observations in neurological sciences. Papers in English are welcomed, particularly those which bring novel information and researches in clinical or basic fields from the neurological disorders. All received manuscripts coving the scope of the journal will be evaluated by properly competent referees. Submission Cover Letter: Submissions should be accompanied by a cover letter including a declaration by the first author on behalf of the others to the effect that (1) The paper has not been published to date (except for abstracts of conference materials). (2) The paper has not been accepted for publication elsewhere. (3) All persons listed as the authors have read it and approved it for publication. The cover letters should be submitted in section "Comments for the Editor". Articles must be written in accurate scientific English appropriate for publication. The articles are subject to review and editing; however, the authors are responsible for the correctness the manuscript's English language. The articles must be submitted only online: ijnl.tums.ac.ir Policies The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject a paper without seeking reviewers' opinion provide the content or the form of the paper does not meet minimum acceptance criteria or if the subject of the paper is beyond the aims and scope of the journal. Everyone listed as the author of a paper is responsible for the reliability and completeness of data presented in the paper. Do not submit papers that copy fully or partially previously published papers. Indicate that this submission is ready to be considered by this journal by checking off the following: The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor). Where available, URLs for the references have been provided. The text is double-spaced; uses an Arial 12-point font; and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal. If the Editorial Board is not notified in advance and the paper is found to have been copied during editorial work, the paper shall be rejected. We expect that all studies reported in the journal conform to the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki (1989). Information on the consent of a relevant ethics committee to perform the trial and the informed consent of the patients to participate in the trial should be given in the Material and methods section of each paper in which diagnostic or therapeutic intervention does not follow from the standard procedure. Authors of case reports must not disclose personal data of patients described. Manuscripts The journal publishes: Original Article Review Article Case Report Short Communication Clinical Notes Editorial Letters to Editor Neurological Images Neurological Videos Iranian Neurological Events Clinical Quiz Details Original and review papers: The maximum length of original and review papers (including tables and figures materials) is 3000 words. Case reports: Case reports will be accepted only as Letter to the Editor. Short communications: The maximum word number of short communications should be below 1200 words with maximum one table or figure and 10 references. The manuscript should be structured including introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, and conclusion with a structured abstracts as original articles. Neurological images or videos: Interesting cases as
African Economic History, 2024
Educatio, 2014
Revista Diálogos (RevDia), 2021
Engenharias: Pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação, 2022
Acta Neuropsychologica
Universal Journal of Public Health, 2023
Allaiter de l’Antiquité à nos jours: Histoire et pratiques d’une culture en Europe, 2023
Annals of Human Biology, 2019
Revista de administración pública, 2023
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
Boletín de Arqueología PUCP