I got this in my change a few days ago (1983 quarter): And here's a normal clad quarter: Side view: Let me know what you think this is...Thanks!!!
cool error! just a regular 1983p is a more than face value coin, but with the error, maybe a dollar or two?
Are you sure it's an error, rather than just the variability in clad layer thickness? It seems to me (without going and checking my pile of change) that there is some variability in clad layers, and this coin seems to be an example thereof.
Agreed, I have two quarters sitting on my desk right now and they both look like that, one is a '72 and the other is an '02 Maine.
If it were missing a layer it would be an error. Problem is, it isn't missing one. Looks like an ordinary quarter to me. If you doubt that, do a simple balance test with any other quarter from your change. You'll find they are the same weight.
No, it is not missing a clad layer at all. It is just an ordinary clad quarter that has had the cladding turned black by corrosion.
It looks like clad coins I pull out of the ground while detecting. Clad coins turn black very fast in the soil.
The top coin looks like one that has been outside for some time. I think it is environmental or corrosion. The clad layers can vary in thickness. Try roll searching halves and you'll see it in every roll. I wonder if they way they are struck or have the reeding placed on the edge if that just gives the appearance that they layer is more thick or thin than normal. Oh, I see GD beat me to it on this one.
Want to duplicate what your seeing? Get some jewelry cleaner, place a quarter in it, leave it sit for about 30 minutes. Bingo you have a twin to your coin.
A quarter with a missing clad layer will be: 1. Weakly struck - since it will be thinner than a normal planchet 2. The same color as a copper cent in either BU or circulated condition - since the cores of these coins are 100% copper.
Yes they do happen every so often, but the coin in this thread is not one of them. It is merely an ordinary corroded quarter.