The Ser/Thr protein kinase mTOR controls metabolic pathways, including the catabolic process of autophagy. Autophagy plays additional, catabolism-independent roles in homeostasis of cytoplasmic endomembranes and whole organelles. How signals from endomembrane damage are transmitted to mTOR to orchestrate autophagic responses is not known. Here we show that mTOR is inhibited by lysosomal damage. Lysosomal damage, recognized by galectins, leads to association of galectin-8 (Gal8) with the mTOR apparatus on the lysosome. Gal8 inhibits mTOR activity through its Ragulator-Rag signaling machinery, whereas galectin-9 activates AMPK in response to lysosomal injury. Both systems converge upon downstream effectors including autophagy and defense against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Thus, a novel galectin-based signal-transduction system, termed here GALTOR, intersects with the known regulators of mTOR on the lysosome and controls them in response to lysosomal damage. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

The Ser/Thr protein kinase MTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase) regulates cellular metabolism and controls macroautophagy/autophagy. Autophagy has both metabolic and quality control functions, including recycling nutrients at times of starvation and removing dysfunctional intracellular organelles. Lysosomal damage is one of the strongest inducers of autophagy, and yet mechanisms of its activation in response to lysosomal membrane damage are not fully understood. Our recent study has uncovered a new signal transduction system based on cytosolic galectins that elicits autophagy by controlling master regulators of metabolism and autophagy, MTOR and AMPK, in response to lysosomal damage. Thus, intracellular galectins are not, as previously thought, passive tags recognizing damage to guide selective autophagy receptors, but control the activation state of AMPK and MTOR in response to endomembrane damage. Abbreviations: MTOR: mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase / Protein Kinase AMP-Activated; SLC38A9: Solute Carrier Family 38 Member 9; APEX2: engineered ascorbate peroxidase 2; RRAGA/B: Ras Related GTP Binding A or B; LAMTOR1: Late Endosomal/Lysosomal Adaptor, MAPK and MTOR Activator 1; LGALS8: Lectin, Galactoside-Binding, Soluble, 8 / Galectin 8; LGALS9: Lectin, Galactoside-Binding, Soluble, 9 / Galectin 9; TAK1: TGF-Beta Activated Kinase 1 / Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase Kinase 7 (MAP3K7); STK11/LKB1: Serine/Threonine Kinase 11 / Liver Kinase B1; ULK1: Unc-51 Like Autophagy Activating Kinase 1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.