- Henry, TW;
- Bentley, MA;
- Clark, RM;
- Davies, PJ;
- Bader, VM;
- Baugher, T;
- Bazin, D;
- Beausang, CW;
- Berryman, JS;
- Bruce, AM;
- Campbell, CM;
- Crawford, HL;
- Cromaz, M;
- Fallon, P;
- Gade, A;
- Henderson, J;
- Iwasaki, H;
- Jenkins, DG;
- Lee, IY;
- Lemasson, A;
- Lenzi, SM;
- Macchiavelli, AO;
- Napoli, DR;
- Nichols, AJ;
- Paschalis, S;
- Petri, M;
- Recchia, F;
- Rissanen, J;
- Simpson, EC;
- Stroberg, SR;
- Wadsworth, R;
- Weisshaar, D;
- Wiens, A;
- Walz, C
Background: Triplet energy differences (TED) can be studied to yield information on isospin-non-conserving interactions in nuclei. Purpose: The systematic behavior of triplet energy differences (TED) of T=1, Jπ=2+ states is examined. The A=62 isobar is identified as having a TED value that deviates significantly from an otherwise very consistent trend. This deviation can be attributed to the tentative assignments of the pertinent states in Ga62 and Ge62. Methods: An in-beam γ-ray spectroscopy experiment was performed to identify excited states in Ga62 using Gamma-Ray Energy Tracking In-Beam Nuclear Array with the S800 spectrometer at NSCL using a two-nucleon knockout approach. Cross-section calculations for the knockout process and shell-model calculations have been performed to interpret the population and decay properties observed. Results: Using the systematics as a guide, a candidate for the transition from the T=1, 2+ state is identified. However, previous work has identified similar states with different Jπ assignments. Cross-section calculations indicate that the relevant T=1, 2+ state should be one of the states directly populated in this reaction. Conclusions: As spins and parities were not measurable, it is concluded that an unambiguous identification of the first T=1, 2+ state is required to reconcile our understanding of TED systematics.