Background

Studies in adults and children suggested that starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) soon after infection positively influences early events in HIV infection raising the possibility that remission may be achieved in some.

Methods

We designed an analytic treatment interruption (ATI) trial to test the hypothesis that a sizable minority of HIV-infected neonates who initiated ART <14 days of birth and maintained on ART would be able to maintain viral suppression when ART was withdrawn. To yield the target cohort for this trial, 73 HIV-infected neonates identified at one hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, were initiated on ART <14 days of birth and maintained on ART tracking viral load (VL) decline and immune recovery (clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02431975).

Findings

Three HIV-infected infants (4.1%) died and nine (12.3%) were lost to follow-up before 48 weeks of age. Of those surviving on study, 52.5% attained and sustained VL <50 copies/ml and half of these sustained CD4+ T-cell percentage >30% which were the primary entry criteria for the ATI trial. Proportions achieving ATI eligibility criteria were similar in the 46 infants starting ART <48 h (19.6%) to 27 infants starting 2-14 days (25.9%) (p = 0.567).

Interpretation

Very early ART on its own, using regimens available when the trial was designed, is insufficient to attain minimum entry criteria needed to justify our trial of ART interruption. Decisions about how quickly to start ART should be based on optimizing standard clinical outcomes rather than with the expectation that remission can be attained.

Funding

NICHD/NIAID (U01HD080441), South African Research Chairs Initiative of DST and NRF (South Africa).

Background

Infancy is an important developmental period when the microbiome is shaped. We hypothesized that earlier antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation would attenuate HIV effects on microbiota in the mouth.

Methods

Oral swabs were collected from 477 children with HIV (CWH) and 123 children without (controls) at two sites in Johannesburg, South Africa. CWH had started ART less than 3 years of age; 63% less than 6 months of age. Most were well controlled on ART at median age 11 years when the swab was collected. Controls were age-matched and recruited from the same communities. Sequencing of V4 amplicon of 16S rRNA was done. Differences in microbial diversity and relative abundances of taxa were compared between the groups.

Results

CWH had lower alpha diversity than controls. Genus-level abundances of Granulicatella, Streptococcus, and Gemella were greater and Neisseria and Haemophilus less abundant among CWH than controls. Associations were stronger among boys. Associations were not attenuated with earlier ART initiation. Shifts in genus-level taxa abundances in CWH relative to controls were most marked in children on lopinavir/ritonavir regimens, with fewer shifts seen if on efavirenz ART regimens.

Conclusion

A distinct profile of less diverse oral bacterial taxa was observed in school-aged CWH on ART compared with uninfected controls suggesting modulation of microbiota in the mouth by HIV and/or its treatments. Earlier ART initiation was not associated with microbiota profile. Proximal factors, including current ART regimen, were associated with contemporaneous profile of oral microbiota and may have masked associations with distal factors such as age at ART initiation.

Analytical antiretroviral treatment interruption (ATI) is an important feature of HIV research, seeking to achieve sustained viral suppression in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) when the goal is to measure effects of novel therapeutic interventions on time to viral load rebound or altered viral setpoint. Trials with ATIs also intend to determine host, virological, and immunological markers that are predictive of sustained viral control off ART. Although ATI is increasingly incorporated into proof-of-concept trials, no consensus has been reached on strategies to maximise its utility and minimise its risks. In addition, differences in ATI trial designs hinder the ability to compare efficacy and safety of interventions across trials. Therefore, we held a meeting of stakeholders from many interest groups, including scientists, clinicians, ethicists, social scientists, regulators, people living with HIV, and advocacy groups, to discuss the main challenges concerning ATI studies and to formulate recommendations with an emphasis on strategies for risk mitigation and monitoring, ART resumption criteria, and ethical considerations. In this Review, we present the major points of discussion and consensus views achieved with the goal of informing the conduct of ATIs to maximise the knowledge gained and minimise the risk to participants in clinical HIV research.